The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

4 protocols using pe cy7 anti human cd163

1

Macrophage Polarization Phenotyping by Flow Cytometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fluorescent staining for flow cytometric analysis of M1 or M2 after 48 h polarization was performed in FACS buffer (PBS with 0.5% BSA, 2 mM EDTA and 0.1% sodium azide). Non-specific antibody binding was blocked by using mouse serum for 10 min at 4°C prior antibody staining. Subsequently, macrophages were stained with fluorochrome-labelled antibody mixtures at 4 °C for 30 min. The following antibodies were used: FITC anti-human CD14 (2 μg/test, clone M5E2), PE anti-human CD54 (1 μg/test, clone HA58), APC-H7 anti-human CD80 (0.25 μg/test, clone L307.4, BD Bioscience, San Jose, CA), PE-Cy7 anti-human CD163 (2 μg/test, clone RM3/1, Biolegend, San Diego, CA), PerCP-eFluor710 anti-human CD206 (0.06 μg/test, clone 19.2, Biosciences, San Diego, CA). Upon staining, M1 or M2 were analyzed using a FACS Canto Plus flow cytometer (BD Bioscience), and data analyzed using FlowJo X Software (BD Bioscience).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Phenotyping of M1 and M2 Macrophages

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fluorescent staining for flow cytometric analysis of M1 or M2 was performed in FACS buffer (PBS with 0.5% BSA, 2 mM EDTA and 0.1% sodium azide). MDM were either treated with vehicle or 30 nM ArchA during 48 h polarization. Non-specific antibody binding was blocked by using mouse serum for 10 min at 4°C prior antibody staining. Subsequently, MDM were stained with fluorochrome-labelled antibody mixtures at 4 °C for 20 min. The following antibodies were used: FITC anti-human CD14 (2 μg/test, clone M5E2, Biolegend, San Diego, CA), PE anti-human CD54 (1 μg/test, clone HA58, eBioscience, San Diego, CA), APC-H7 anti-human CD80 (0.25 μg/test, clone L307.4, BD Bioscience), PE-Cy7 anti-human CD163 (2 μg/test, clone RM3/1, Biolegend), PerCP-eFluor710 anti-human CD206 (0.06 μg/test, clone 19.2, eBioscience). Upon staining, MDM (M1 or M2) were analyzed using a FACS Canto Plus flow cytometer (BD Bioscience), and data analyzed using FlowJo X Software (BD Bioscience).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Monocyte-to-Macrophage Differentiation and Polarization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The differentiation of monocytes to macrophages and polarization towards M1 and M2 was performed as previously described (Werz et al., 2018 (link)). M1 were generated by incubating monocytes with 20 ng/ml GM-CSF (Peprotech, Hamburg, Germany) for 6 days in RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% FCS, 2 mmol/L L-glutamine, penicillin (100 U/ml), and streptomycin (100 µg/ml), followed by 100 ng/ml LPS and 20 ng/ml INF-γ (Peprotech) treatment for another 48 h. M2 were obtained by incubating monocytes with 20 ng/ml M-CSF (Peprotech) for 6 days and subsequent treatment with 20 ng/ml IL-4 (Peprotech) for additional 48 h. Correct polarization and purity of macrophages were routinely checked by flow cytometry (FACS Canto Plus flow cytometer, BD Bioscience) as previously reported (Werner et al., 2019 (link)) using the following antibodies: FITC anti-human CD14 (2 µg/test, clone M5E2, BD Bioscience), PE anti-human CD54 (1 µg/test, clone HA58, BD Bioscience), APC-H7 anti-human CD80 (0.25 µg/test, clone L307.4, BD Bioscience), PE-Cy7 anti-human CD163 (2 µg/test, clone RM3/1, Biolegend, San Diego, CA), and PerCP-eFluor710 anti-human CD206 (0.06 µg/test, clone 19.2, Biosciences, San Diego, CA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Multiparametric Flow Cytometry of Monocytes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Monocytes were washed in 1× PBS and incubated in blocking solution consisting of FACS buffer (145 mM NaCl, 8.45 mM Na2HPO4, 1.83 mM NaH2PO4, and 0.1% NaN3), 5% BSA, and human FcR binding inhibitor (eBioscience, San Diego, CA, USA) for 20 min on ice. After blocking, cells were stained by adding APC anti-human CD14, Alexa Fluor 488 anti-human CD16, PE/Cy7 anti-human CD163, Brilliant Violet 605 anti-human CD86 (BioLegend, San Diego, CA, USA), and APC-R700 anti-human CD80 antibodies (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA) or isotype controls on ice. Cells were then washed in 1× PBS and analyzed by flow cytometry using an LSRFortessa cell analyzer and BD FACSDiva software (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA).
For viability studies, monocytes were washed after incubation with the APC anti-human CD14 antibody as described above. Cells were then stained with phycoerythrin-annexin V (BD Pharmingen, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) and either Sytox Blue dead cell stain (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) or propidium iodide (PI) dead cell stain (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) to detect dead and dying cells. After staining, cells were analyzed by flow cytometry as described above. Double negative cells represent live cells, whereas double positive and single positive cells represent dead and/or dying cells.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!