The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

55 protocols using site directed mutagenesis

1

Cloning and Mutagenesis of BRI2 Variants

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The cDNA encoding human wild-type BRI2, and the FBD and FDD mutants forms of BRI2 with the addition of a Kozak sequence and an N-terminal Myc epitope tag were PCR amplified, gel purified, and sub-cloned into pcDNA 3.1 directional TOPO vector (Invitrogen). Plasmids were transformed into DH5alpha cells (Invitrogen), and positive colonies were screened by restriction enzyme analysis and direct DNA sequencing. To introduce an Asp to Ala change at aa 170, site-directed mutagenesis (Agilent Technologies) was done according to the manufacturer’s protocol using primers forward (5′-CTA TGT GAT CCC TCT GGC CAC TTC CAT TGT TAT GC-3′) and reverse (5′-GCA TAA CAA TGG AAG TGG CCA GAG GGA TCA CAT AG-3′).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Genetically Engineered Mcm Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The FKBP/FRB insertion sites were chosen based on a structural model of the archaeal M. thermoautotrophicum MCM protein (Fletcher et al. 2003 (link)), the secondary structure and sequence alignments of the MtMCM sequence, and those of Mcm2 to Mcm7 from S. cerevisiae. The construction of the FKBP/FRB constructs was based on the plasmids pESC-Mcm2–Mcm7 (pCS14), pESC-Mcm6–Mcm7 (pCS15), and pESC-HA-Mcm3–Mcm5 (pCS232) (Evrin et al. 2009 (link)). Initially, restriction sites (AsiSI and AscI) were introduced at the sites of insertion using site-directed mutagenesis (Agilent). To maintain the reading frame, an additional nucleotide was inserted after the 8-base-pair (bp) restriction site (AsiSI: a; AscI: c). The FRB domain, including linkers, was fused into Mcm2, Mcm3, and Mcm4 via AsiSI restriction sites (AIAGANTCTPRGSGMLPSGMASR-FRB-TSYPYDVPDYAGANDGAAIA). The FKBP domain, including linkers, was fused into Mcm5, Mcm6, and Mcm7 via AscI (SSYPYDVPDYASLGGPSSPKKKRKVSR-FKBP-TSYISFLNSDLINSRTQRVDGQIGAP). The FKBP and FRB genes, including linkers, were codon-optimized for expression in S. cerevisiae (Genscript).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Fission Yeast Constructs for GRα Study

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The Schizosaccharomyces pombe strain JP308 (h+ ura 4-D18), JP305 (h+ leu1-32), JP198 (h styI:: ura4, ∆leu1-32,∆ura4-D18), Bioneer G418 (h+ ∆HSP104:: kanMX4, ade6-M216, ura4-D18,leu1-32) were using in this study. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain Y2hGold (MATa, trp1-901, leu2-3, 112, ura3-52, his3-200, gal4Δ, gal80Δ, LYS2:: GAL1UAS–Gal1TATA–His3, GAL2UAS–Gal2TATA–Ade2AUR1CMEL1) was used for the two hybrid system (Clontech). Yeast transformations were obtained by the lithium acetate method39 (link). Cells were grown in synthetic minimal selective medium.
The human GRα (hGRα) was cloned into Nde1/BamHI site of the pRep41 vector (Leu2) and pRep42 (Ura4) under the control of the medium thiamine-repressible nmt42 promoter40 (link). GRα GFP was constructed by GRα N-terminal fusion with green GFP cloned in pRep 42 vector. The GR deletions were generated by excising a BglII/ BglII fragment for the AF1 fragment and by deleting an EcoRI/EcoRI fragment for the LBD, all within the pRep 42 vector. The DBD deletion was constructed by using Site-Directed mutagenesis (Agilent Technologies) to delete between positions 421-488 (Fig. 1A). Vectors pGBKT7 and pGADT7 (Clontech) were used for the two-hybrid system.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Generation of HSPB1 Viral Vectors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The wild type HSPB1 viral vector was generated by digestion of M13-HSPB1
plasmid (GeneCopoeia) with BstB1 and NotI, and ligated into the pcDNA4/TO vector
(Invitrogen), in frame with an N-terminal FLAG sequence. The FLAG-HSPB1 cDNA was
then PCR amplified to create a 5` BamH1 site and 3` Xho1 site.
This construct was then ligated into a pCSC-SP-PW (Addgene) backbone. Site
directed mutagenesis (Agilent) was used to generate HSPB1(G84R), HSPB1(R136W),
HSPB1(TriA) and HSPB1(TriD) vectors (primer sequences available upon request).
Viral particles were produced as previously described (82 (link)) and delivered to astrocytes with a MOI20.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Cloning and Purification of E6AP and MASTL Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A vector expressing HA-tagged human E6AP was obtained from Addgene (Plasmid #8658), E6AP mutants were generated using site-directed mutagenesis (Agilent) following the protocol recommended by the manufacturer. Segments of E6AP, including N (aa 1–280), M (aa 280–497), C (aa 497–770), were inserted to a pEGFP vector for IP, and pMBP vector for pull-down. Additional segments, including N1 (aa 1–99), N2 (aa 100–207), and N3 (108–280) were cloned to pEGFP for IP. Expression vectors for MASTL were previously characterized (Yamamoto et al., 2014 (link)). Additionally, three segments of MASTL (N: aa 1–340; M: aa 335–660; C: aa 656–887) were inserted into pGEX 4T-1(GE Healthcare). The resulting expression vectors were transfected into BL21 bacteria cells for protein expression and purification. For the pulldown experiments, GST-tagged proteins were purified on glutathione-Sepharose beads (New England Biolabs), and MBP-tagged proteins were purified on Amylose resin (New England Biolabs).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Cloning and Mutagenesis of 3' UTR Regions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The 3′ UTR region of GATA3 or IL-4, as well as the 3′ UTR plus partial sequences in the coding region of IL-4, were cloned into psiCheck2 (Promega). miR-23a, miR-24, and miR-27a sequences were respectively cloned into pMDH-PGK-EGFP, similar to what was described previously (Lu et al., 2009 (link)). To generate GATA3 or IL-4 3′ UTR mutants, site-directed mutagenesis was performed (Agilent). 1 d before transfection, HEK293T cells were plated at 6.5 × 104 cells per well on a 24-well plate. psiCheck2 bearing WT 3′ UTR or corresponding mutant 3′ UTR were transfected to HEK293T cells with control vector or miRNA expressing plasmid using Fugene 6 (Promega). Luciferase activities were assessed at 24 h after transfection using Dual-Luciferase Reporter assay system (Promega) according to the manufacturer’s protocol.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Removing FLAG Tag from Plasmids

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Site-directed mutagenesis (Agilent) with primers listed in S2 Table was performed to remove the sequence encoding the FLAG tag from plasmids obtained from the H2A and H2B mutant library [27 (link)]. Plasmid sequences were confirmed by DNA sequencing. Plasmid names are given in S3 Table.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Transient Expression of HIV-1 Env in HEK293T Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For transient expression of Env in HEK293T cells, we used the Env gene from HIV-LAI in a pcDNA3.1 expression vector (Addgene) [87 (link)]. Env variants were introduced by site-directed mutagenesis (Agilent) and confirmed by Sanger sequencing of the Env gene (S1 Table). HEK293T cells were plated in 6-well plates at a density of 7 × 105 cells/well and allowed to adhere overnight. The next day, cells were transfected with 1.5 μg of eGFP in pcDNA3.1 (GFP control) or 0.15 μg of eGFP and 1.35 μg of Env plasmid using Lipofectamine reagents (Thermo Fisher). After 16 h, the medium was changed. After another 24 h, cells were harvested for analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Lentiviral Cell Line Generation and Transient Transfection

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Lentiviral cell line generation was undertaken as previously described [24 (link)]. Briefly, 293 T cells were transfected with pLKO.1-shCTSV plasmids (Sigma-Aldrich), after which viral supernatant was harvested and used to transduce MCF-7 and ZR-75-1 cells. For transient transfections, cells were transfected using GeneJuice® transfection reagent in accordance to manufacturer’s instructions. pcDNA3.1-CTSV ORF (GeneScript), pCMV-Flag-STYX (MRC Protein Phosphorylation and Ubiquitylation Unit, University of Dundee) or empty vector control plasmids were transfected and incubated for 48 h before protein extraction and analysis. The catalytic cysteine residue of pcDNA3.1-CTSV ORF was mutated to a serine reside using site-directed mutagenesis (Agilent Technologies) to give rise to the mutant construct (mtCTSV). The shRNA-resistant plasmid (rCTSV) was also generated using site-directed mutagenesis of pcDNA3.1-CTSV ORF, with the targeting sequence of shCTSV-1 mutated to alter codon usage but still produce the same protein sequence.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Genetic Modification of Yeast Strains

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Yeast strains used in this study are listed in supplemental Table 1. Yeast plasmids used: pKA88 carrying GFP tagged Abp126 (link), pKA606 carrying wild type Las1725 (link); mutations in pKA606: pKA1087 with Las17 S554A and pKA1088 with S554D. Unless stated otherwise, cells were grown with rotary shaking at 30 °C in liquid YPD medium (1% yeast extract, 2% Bacto-peptone, 2% glucose supplemented with 40 μg/ml adenine) or in synthetic medium (0.67% yeast nitrogen base, 2% glucose) with appropriate supplements. All strains carrying fluorescent tags have growth properties similar to control strains. Point mutations in LAS17 were generated using site directed mutagenesis (Agilent). DNA cassettes carrying mutations for integration were transformed into KAY1801. Mutant colonies were counter-selected on minimal medium, containing 0.005% uracil and 0.1% 5'-Fluoroorotic Acid (5-FOA; Melford laboratories). Allele exchange, in growing Ura3-5-FOA resistant colonies, was confirmed by PCR and sequencing.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!