The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Bright field microscopy

Manufactured by Zeiss
Sourced in Germany

Bright field microscopy is an optical microscopy technique that illuminates the sample with bright light, allowing for the observation of its structure and details. The sample is placed on a slide and illuminated from below, with the resulting image captured by the microscope's objective lens and eyepiece. This technique provides a clear, high-contrast view of the sample, making it suitable for a wide range of applications in various fields, such as biology, materials science, and medical research.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

15 protocols using bright field microscopy

1

Quantitative Analysis of GABAAR Subunits

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunoperoxidase stained sections were examined by bright-field microscopy (Carl Zeiss AG, Jena, Germany) using a 10x (N.A. 0.5) dry objective. Images were acquired with an 8-bit color digital camera controlled by AxioVision 4.8 (Carl Zeiss, AG, Jena, Germany). Densitometry analysis of different GABAAR α-subunits was performed using the MCID M5 software (Imaging Research Inc., Brock University, St Catharines, ON, Canada). Images were digitized on a light box using a CoolSnap digital camera (Photometrics, Tuscon, AZ, USA) with a Micro-Nikkor 55 mm + 12 mm objective (Nikon Corporation). Staining intensity was measured as calibrated relative optical density in nine regions of interest: CA1, CA3, DG, hilus of the hippocampus, somatosensory cortex (layers II–III, IV, V–VI), striatum, ventrobasal complex of the thalamus (or reticular thalamic nucleus for the α3 subunit). Background was measured in the corpus callosum and subtracted.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantifying Cell Proliferation in Hydrogels

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell proliferation was monitored over 14 days using bright field microscopy (Zeiss, Jena, Germany). To quantify fold change in cell proliferation, cell DNA content in hydrogels at Days 1 and 14 was measured using the Quant-iT PicoGreen assay (Life Technologies). Briefly, lyophilized hydrogel samples were rehydrated and digested using papain (Worthington Biochemical Corp) at 60°C for 16 hrs (n = 3). After cooling to room temperature, samples were vortexed and centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 5 min. The supernatant was used to measure total DNA content per hydrogel using PicoGreen assay (Life Technologies) per manufacturer’s instructions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Tissue Morphology and Scaffold Coverage

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tissue sections were de-paraffinized with xylene, then rehydrated with a graded ethanol series to deionized H2O. Rehydrated sections were stained with Hematoxylin(Sigma–Aldrich, MO, USA) and counterstained with Eosin to visualize cellular structures. Stained sections were scanned and digitized using a bright field microscopy (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) to document tracheal tissue morphology.
Hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E) staining was used to determine the extent of epithelial cell coverage on PET/PU scaffolds. The linear distance of scaffold covered by epithelial cells was measured in longitudinal sections using ImageJ software (US National Institutes of Health, MD, USA). The length of the entire graft was also measured to calculate the percent of coverage. Proximal and distal anastomoses were identified and used as the origins of measurement.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Invasion Assay for Breast Cancer

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Boyden Chamber assay was performed to access invasion capability of breast cancer cells according to earlier reported method with slight modifications.15 (link) Breast cancer cells were treated with CoCl2 (100 µM)) and transfected with IL-6R siRNA. Other groups were treated with Dia (6 µM) or 5-Aza (5 µM). These treated cells were placed on the upper chamber of Boyden set up. In lower chamber, VEGF containing medium was added. After 24 h of incubation, upper chamber was taken and non-migrated cells were swapped with cotton plug. Upper chambers were then fixed with methanol and stained with haematoxylin and eosin followed by proper washing. Migrated cells were subjected to bright field microscopy at ×20 magnifications (Carl Zeiss).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Microfluidic Fabrication of Liposomal Hydrogel Microspheres

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HM@WY-Lip/UA were fabricated through the generation of water-in-oil droplets using microfluidics [56 (link)]. The water phase consisted of a 5 wt% mixture of HAMA, WY-Lip/UA, and a photoinitiator (in a ratio of 80:12:8, w/w/w). Additionally, a mixture consisting of paraffin oil and 5 wt% Span 80 was formulated for the oil phase. The oil and water phases were combined and introduced into the microfluidic device through the inlet utilizing a syringe pump, using a flow rate ratio that had been adjusted appropriately. Cross-linking was achieved by exposing the droplets to UV radiation for 5 min. After this, the cross-linked microspheres underwent a cleansing process involving acetone and deionized water, followed by a freeze-drying period of 48 h.
Bright-field microscopy (ZEISS, Germany) was used to examine the morphology and size of HM@WY-Lip/UA. To validate the effective binding of liposomes to HM, liposomes labeled with DiI were used to confirm the successful incorporation of liposomes, which were subsequently observed utilizing LSCM. After 60 s of gold spraying using an ion sputtering instrument, the surface morphology and microstructure of HM or HM@WY-Lip/UA were examined through SEM analysis (FEI Sirion 200, USA). SEM images were obtained at an accelerating voltage of 10 kV.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Mammosphere Formation Assay Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mammosphere formation assay was performed as described previously [5 (link)]. In brief, either 2500 cells/well or 1000 cells/well was grown in 24-well low-attachment plates. After 7 days, all mammospheres in each well were assessed via bright-field microscopy (Zeiss). Mammospheres were imaged and analyzed with ImageJ software to obtain the diameters. The mammospheres which diameter was larger than 50 μm were counted. Three independent experiments were performed.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Transwell Assay for Cell Migration

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MDA-MB-231 cells were seeded and treated with nanohybrids as described above. After 18 h of incubation with fresh RPMI-1640 (10% FBS), cells were harvested and plated into the upper chambers of the Transwell insert (Corning) in serum-free medium. Medium containing 20% FBS was added to the lower chamber. After incubation for 24 h, the cells on the upper surface were removed and cells migrated to the lower surface were fixed and stained with 0.2% crystal violet for 10 min. Migrated cells were counted in five randomly-selected fields using bright-field microscopy (Zeiss). The cell migration rate was calculated: relative migration rate (%) = (number of migrated cells with treatment)/(number of migrated cells without treatment) × 100%. Each batch was carried out in triplicate.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Measurement of C2C12 myotube diameters

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
C2C12 myotubes were treated with differentiation medium supplemented with 10% conditioned medium from KPC for 48 h. Pictures of myotubes were taken with bright field microscopy (Zeiss), and diameters of myotubes were measured using the software JMicroVision as previously described [16 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Post-Mortem Eye Iron Staining

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Paraffin human post mortem eye tissues were stained for iron by the Perls method. Briefly, Perls reaction staining was performed after deparaffinization by incubating slides in a solution containing 4% potassium ferrocyanide (Sigma) in 4% aqueous hydrochloric acid (Sigma) for 1 h at room temperature to yield a Prussian blue reaction product. Sensitivity for iron detection was enhanced by incubation in 3,3′-Diaminobenzidine Tetrahydrochloride (DAB, Vector Labs, Eurobio, Courtabouef, France) for 1 h at room temperature, producing a brown reaction product. Nucleus counterstaining was performed by incubation in a solution of 1% nuclear red (Merck) for 30 s. Stained sections were mounted in aqueous medium. Control of amplification was realized by incubation of sections with DAB without the preceding Perls reaction step. Sections were analyzed by brightfield microscopy (Zeiss, Rueil Malmaison, France) and pictures were acquired using identical exposure conditions in the optic nerve or at a similar distance from the optic nerve.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Histological Analysis of Decellularized Trachea

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
NT, STG, PDTG, and CTG were fixed at room temperature in 10% NBF for 24 to 48 hours. Paraffin-embedded specimens were embedded in paraffin and sectioned into 4 μm thickness longitudinally. Sections were then deparaffinized and rehydrated prior to staining with hematoxylin (Sigma-Aldrich) and counterstaining with eosin. H&E stain of postimplantation tracheal sections was used to confirm the successful decellularization process. Bright-field microscopy (Zeiss) was used to image-stained sections.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!