The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

500 protocols using vitek 2 compact system

1

Gram-Negative Bacteria Surveillance in China

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We retrospectively collected 12,858 Gram-negative bacteria that were isolated from wildlife (6,226/12,858), patients (5,828/12,858), livestock and poultry (712/12,858), and environment (92/12,858) in 14 provinces (Anhui, Beijing, Gansu, Guangxi, Guizhou, Hainan, Hunan, Jiangxi, Ningxia, Qinghai, Sichuan, Tianjin, Yunnan, Zhejiang) of China from 2010 to 2019. The study was approved by the ethics review committee of the National Institute for Communicable Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention. Informed consent was obtained from participants. All strains were identified using VITEK II Compact system (bioMérieux, France) or API 20E strips (bioMérieux, France). The mcr-1 or blaNDM gene positive strains were identified again by VITEK II Compact system (bioMérieux, France), the results of which were consistent with the original ones.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Staphylococcus aureus Identification and Antibiotic Susceptibility

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All S. aureus isolates were identified by the automated VITEK2 compact system (bioMérieux, Marcy l’Étoile, France) and detection of femB (Jonas et al., 1999 (link)). MRSA and MSSA were determined by cefoxitin screening and detection of mecA. Susceptibility to 12 antibiotics was analyzed using the automated VITEK2 compact system (bioMérieux, Marcy l’Étoile, France); minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) interpretive criteria followed the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines (CLSI, 2016 ). S. aureus ATCC 29213 was used as the quality control strain for identification and antibiotic-susceptibility tests.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Acb Complex Identification and Antibiotic Susceptibility

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Identification of Acb complex isolates was initially performed using automated identification systems the VITEK 2 compact system (BioMérieux, Craponne, France). Further identification of the Acb complex to the species level was performed by gyrB multiplex PCR [15 (link), 16 (link)].
In vitro susceptibilities to ampicillin-sulbactam, piperacillin-tazobactam, ceftazidime, cefepime, meropenem, imipenem, gentamicin, amikacin, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, colistin, minocyline were determined by the VITEK 2 compact system (BioMérieux, Craponne, France). Escherichia coli (ATCC 25922) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ATCC 27853) were used as quality control strains. Results were interpreted according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI, 2016) guidelines.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Antibiotic Susceptibility Patterns of Hospital Pathogens

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data on pathogens isolated from patients admitted to the hospital were retrospectively obtained from FAHZU. The isolates were identified by the VITEK 2 compact system (bioMérieux), and antibiotic susceptibility was determined by either the disc diffusion method18 or the VITEK 2 compact system. The results were then interpreted uniformly in accordance with the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute criteria.18 To guarantee the reproducibility of testing methodologies, we used E. faecalis ATCC 29212, S. aureus ATCC 25923, Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853, and Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 as reference strains.
The pathogens included in this study were Klebsiella pneumoniae, E. coli, A. baumannii, P. aeruginosa, S. aureus, coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (CNS), E. faecalis, and E. faecium, which were the most frequent isolates in our hospital for the past 10 years. The isolation density for each species was the number of isolates per 10,000 patient-days (10,000-pd). The susceptibility rate of each antibiotic was calculated as the number of susceptible isolates divided by the total isolation number.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Antibiotic Susceptibility Profiling of Klebsiella pneumoniae

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion method was conducted for all 230 K. pneumoniae isolates using Mueller-Hinton agar and the results were recorded in accordance with CLSI 201516 guidelines. The used antimicrobial discs (Oxoid; UK) included beta-lactams as ampicillin (10µg), amoxicillin (10µg), amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (20/10µg), ampicillin/sulbactam (10/10µg), ticarcillin/clavulanic acid (75/10µg), piperacillin/tazobactam (100/10µg), meropenem (10µg), imipenem (10µg), cefoxitin (30µg), cefotetan (30µg), cefazolin (30µg), cefuroxime (30µg), ceftriaxone (30µg), cefotaxime (30µg), ceftazidime (30µg), cefepime (30µg), aztreonam (30µg); aminoglycosides as gentamicin (10µg), tobramycin (10µg), amikacin (30µg) and other antimicrobials including chloramphenicol (30µg), ciprofloxacin (5µg), tetracycline (30µg) and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (1.25/23.75µg),. Susceptibility to tigecycline was detected using Vitek2® compact system (BioMérieux®). Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were detected for all CR-KP isolates using Vitek2® compact system (BioMérieux®). Any isolate would be recorded to have MDR profile if it showed non-susceptibility to ≥3 different antimicrobial classes4 .
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Antimicrobial Susceptibility of CRKP

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Forty-two CRKP isolates were tested for antimicrobial susceptibility by the VitekII Compact system (bioMérieux, Marcy l’Etoile, Lyon, France) and the K-B disk diffusion method, with the results based on the standards of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) 2021-M100.5 Quality control strains were Escherichia coli ATCC25922 and K. pneumoniae ATCC700603 (purchased from China National Health Inspection Center).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Isolation and Identification of STEC in Meat

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
STEC strains were isolated and identified according to the guidelines in the Standards for Processing and Ingredients of Specifications Livestock Products in Korea with slight modifications [27 (link)]. Briefly, 434 meat samples were collected from packaged raw beef, pork, and chicken meats from retail markets in Korea during 2006 to 2012. Twenty-five grams of each fresh meat sample was taken aseptically and homogenized with 225 mL of buffered peptone water (Oxoid, UK). For E. coli isolation, 10 mL of the homogenized mixture were blended in 90 mL of Brilliant Green Bile Broth (Oxoid) and incubated at 37℃ for 24 to 48 h. One loop of the enrichment culture was streaked onto Eosin Methylene Blue agar (Oxoid). Plates were examined for typical E. coli colonies after incubation at 37℃ for 18 to 24 h. From each positive sample, typical colonies were transferred onto Tryptone Soy Agar (TSA; BD Diagnostics) and incubated at 37℃ for 18 to 24 h. The resultant colonies were kept at −80℃ as 40% (v/v) glycerol stocks. Each isolate was identified by using the Vitek II Compact system (bioMé rieux, France). In addition, all isolates were confirmed by performing polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with primers specific to E. coli 16S rDNA and stx gene [27 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Comprehensive Bacterial Identification Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Conventional tests included Xpert assay, pathological examination, MGIT 960 culture, and T-SPOT.TB test. The experimental procedure was consistent with our previous studies (Li et al., 2018 (link)). Bacterial culture examination: Specimens were tested by using aerobic and anaerobic bacterial cultures. Briefly, abscess specimens were plated and incubated for up to 5 days on 5% sheep blood and MacConkey agar for aerobic culture and on 5% sheep blood agar for anaerobic culture. Bacterial identification was performed with VITEK 2 Compact system (Bio Mérieux, France). Operation was conducted in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Imipenem Resistance Evaluation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Imipenem resistance was analyzed by minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) method and VITEK‐2 compact system (BioMerieux), ≦1 μg/mL is defined as sensitive and ≧4 μg/mL is defined as resistance based on Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Three replicates for every isolate were performed.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Identifying and Profiling P. aeruginosa

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Isolates were identified as P aeruginosa based on colony morphology, odour, Gram staining, production of blue-green pigment on Mueller Hinton agar (MHA), reactions (k/k) on triple sugar iron agar slants and positive oxidase reaction. Identification of the species was confirmed with the Vitek 2 compact system (bioMérieux, France) as required. Antibiotic susceptibilities of these isolates were determined with the Vitek 2 automated system (bioMérieux, France).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!