The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

10 protocols using anti dnmt1 antibody

1

Quantifying DNMT1 and CD31 in Cancer

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunohistochemistry for DNMT1 done on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue using anti-DNMT1 antibody from Abcam (Cambridge, MA) overnight at a dilution of 1:500 and were stained using automated staining platform (Ventana). Envision + polymer (ready to use; Dako) was used as a secondary antibody. Color was developed with 3,3′-diaminobenzidine (DAB) and instant hematoxylin (Shandon) was used for counterstaining. The DNMT1 level was evaluated and verified by two qualified pathologists, who scored both the proportion of positive cells as well as the intensity of DNMT1 expression in both cancer cells and their stromal fibroblasts.
For CD31, the number of CD31-positive vessels was counted in five different highest fields of microvessel density (40x objective lens and 10x ocular lens). CD31[P2B1] (ab24590) was purchased from Abcam.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Chromatin Immunoprecipitation Analysis Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
ChIP analysis was performed according to the instructions provided with the ChIP assay kit (Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA). In brief, CD14+ monocytes were fixed for 10 min at RT with 1% formaldehyde. Glycine was subsequently added to a final concentration of 0.125 M to quench the formaldehyde. Cells were pelleted, washed once with ice-cold PBS, and lysed with SDS buffer. Lysates were pelleted, resuspended, and sonicated to reduce DNA to fragments of 200 to 1000 base pairs. Chromatin was precipitated with protein A agarose beads for 1 h and then incubated with an anti-RFX1 antibody (Santa Cruz), anti-DNMT1 antibody (Abcam), anti-HDAC1 antibody (Abcam), anti-SUV39H1 antibody (Abcam), histone H3ac (pan-acetyl) antibody (Active motif), histone H4ac (pan-acetyl) antibody (Active motif), and histone H3 trimethyl Lys9 antibody (Active motif) or normal IgG (Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany) overnight. The immunocomplexes were further precipitated with protein A agarose beads, washed, and eluted in 100 mL of TE with 0.5% SDS and 200 mg/mL proteinase K. Precipitated DNA was further purified with phenol/chloroform extraction and ethanol. The relative enrichment level was quantified using qPCR and calculated relative to the respective input DNA [33 (link)]. The primers used are shown in Additional file 1: Table S1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantification of DNMT1 Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Frozen sections harvested from cows in lactation periods with high and low milk qualities were fixed in acetone at 4°C for 10 min. The tissue sections on slides were washed with phosphate buffered saline (PBS) containing 5% Tween-20 (PBST) and incubated with 5% BSA at 37°C for 60 min. The slides were then incubated with anti-DNMT1 antibody (1∶200, Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA) in a humid chamber at 4°C overnight, rinsed three times with PBST and incubated for 60 min with TRITC-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (1∶200, Zhongshan-Bio, Beijing, China). The slides were then washed three times with PBST and incubated in 1 µg/ml propidium iodide (PI) (Roche, Florence, Carolina, USA) for 10 min. Finally, 100 µL Antifade Mounting Medium (Beyotime, China) was added. We viewed the slides under a laser scanning confocal microscope (Leica, Germany). Image-Pro Plus (IPP) 6.0 software was used for detecting the mean density of the DNMT1 expression. Three sections from each group were used to quantify the DNMT1 protein.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Immunoblotting for PARP1 and DNMT1 proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The proteins pulled down by DNA pull-down assays were separated by electrophoresis on 4-20% SDS-PAGE gradient gels at 100 V for 1 h. They were then transferred onto nitrocellulose at 100 V for 2 h at 4°C (Life Technologies). The blots were blocked for 1 h in 5% milk (Bio-Rad) prepared in PBS (Life Technologies), 0.1% Tween (Bio-Rad). They were subsequently incubated with anti-PARP1 antibody (Santa Cruz) or anti-DNMT1 antibody (Abcam) at 4°C overnight. The blots were then washed three times in 0.1% Tween in PBS (Sigma-Aldrich); 5% milk in PBS, and 0.1% Tween in PBS (Life Technologies) for 15 min each, respectively. The blots were then incubated with anti-rabbit HRP (GE Health Sciences) for 2 h at room temperature and then washed in 0.1% Tween in PBS three times for 15 min each. HRP was detected with ECL (Pierce) and chemiluminescence was detected with ECL films (Amersham Pharmacia Biosciences).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Chromatin Immunoprecipitation Assay (ChIP) Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Chromatin Immunoprecipitation Assay (ChIP) analysis was performed with a ChIP assay kit (Millipore, USA) according to the instructions. In brief, CD14+ monocyte cells were fixed for 8 min at room temperature with 1% formaldehyde. Glycine was then added to a final concentration of 0.125 M to quench the formaldehyde. The monocytes were pelleted, washed once with ice-cold phosphate buffered saline (PBS), and lysed. The lysates were pelleted, resuspended, and sonicated to reduce DNA to 200 to 1,000 bp fragments. Chromatin was precipitated with protein A agarose beads for 1 h and then incubated with tri-methylated H3K9 antibody (Abcam, USA), anti-histone H3/H4 acetylation antibody (Millipore, Germany), anti-RFX1 antibody (Santa Cruz), anti-DNMT1 antibody (Abcam, USA), anti-HDAC1 antibody (Abcam, USA), anti-SUV39H1antibody (Abcam, USA) or control mouse IgG (Millipore, Germany) overnight. The immunocomplexes were further precipitated with protein A agarose beads, washed, and eluted in 100 ml of TE with 0.5% SDS and 200 mg/ml proteinase K. Precipitated DNA was further purified through phenol/chloroform extraction and ethanol. The fold enrichment was quantified by using qPCR and calculated relative to the respective input DNA. The primers used are shown in Table S4 in the Supplementary Material.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

DNMT1 Protein Expression Detection

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunohistochemistry on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues was performed using anti-DNMT1 antibody from Abcam (Cambridge, MA) overnight at a dilution of 1:500 and were stained using automated staining platform (Ventana). Envision + polymer (ready to use; Dako) was used as a secondary antibody. Color was developed with 3,3′-diaminobenzidine (DAB) and instant hematoxylin (Shandon) was used for counterstaining.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Immunoblotting for PARP1 and DNMT1 proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The proteins pulled down by DNA pull-down assays were separated by electrophoresis on 4-20% SDS-PAGE gradient gels at 100 V for 1 h. They were then transferred onto nitrocellulose at 100 V for 2 h at 4°C (Life Technologies). The blots were blocked for 1 h in 5% milk (Bio-Rad) prepared in PBS (Life Technologies), 0.1% Tween (Bio-Rad). They were subsequently incubated with anti-PARP1 antibody (Santa Cruz) or anti-DNMT1 antibody (Abcam) at 4°C overnight. The blots were then washed three times in 0.1% Tween in PBS (Sigma-Aldrich); 5% milk in PBS, and 0.1% Tween in PBS (Life Technologies) for 15 min each, respectively. The blots were then incubated with anti-rabbit HRP (GE Health Sciences) for 2 h at room temperature and then washed in 0.1% Tween in PBS three times for 15 min each. HRP was detected with ECL (Pierce) and chemiluminescence was detected with ECL films (Amersham Pharmacia Biosciences).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Western Blot Analysis of Epigenetic Regulators

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell lysates (50 μg protein) were electrophoresed, transferred, and immunoblotted with specific antibodies. Anti-AhR, anti-TET1, and anti-TBP antibodies were purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.; the anti-DNMT1 antibody was from Abcam (Burlingame, CA, USA); the anti-DNMT3B antibody was from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA, USA); the anti-p16INK4A and anti-EZH2 antibodies were from Cell Signaling Technology, Inc. (Danvers, MA, USA), and the anti-MLL1 antibody was purchased from Active Motif (Carlsbad, CA, USA). The membranes with bound primary antibodies (1:1000) were reacted with horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated secondary antibodies (Pierce, Rockland, IL, USA), and the protein bands were assessed by a western blotting detection kit (Amersham, Little Chalfont, Buckinghamshire, UK).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Chromatin Immunoprecipitation and RNA Immunoprecipitation Protocols

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Chip assay was operated using Chip Immunoprecipitation Kit (Millipore) based on the manufacturer's protocol. In short, the cells were collected and treated with formaldehyde so that the DNA-protein interaction was cross-linked and fixed. The whole cell lysate was obtained by RIPA lysate. Ultrasound treats the cells, breaking the genomic DNA to 100-500bp. Then, the lysates were incubated with protein A/B beads (Biolinkedin, Shanghai, China), anti-DNMT1 antibody (Abcam) or control IgG. The next day, elution is performed and the DNA is uncrosslinked. The DNA was isolated using an DNA extraction kit (Tiangen). The enrichment of promoters were measured using qPCR assay.
RIP assay was operated using RIP Immunoprecipitation Kit (Millipore) based on the manufacturer's protocol. In short, cells were lysed in RIPA buffer combined with RNase inhibitor and protease inhibitor. Then, the lysates were incubated with protein A/B beads (Biolinkedin, Shanghai, China), anti-METTL3 antibody (Abcam) or control IgG. Next day, the immunoprecipitated RNA were digested with proteinase K and isolated using an RNAs extraction kit (Junxin). The enrichment of RNA transcripts were measured using qPCR assay.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Protein Expression Analysis in Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The protein levels of DNMT1, TGFb1, USF1 and SREBP1 were analyzed by immunoblotting using anti-DNMT1 antibody (Abcam, no. ab188453), anti-TGFb1 antibody (Abcam, no. ab92486), anti-USF1 antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, no. sc-229) and anti-SREBP1 antibody ((R&D Systems, no. NB100-60545SS)). Expression levels of beta-actin were used for normalization. The protein level of beta-actin was analyzed using anti-beta-actin antibody (Abcam, no. ab8227). Wide-view prestained protein size marker III was used as size marker of DNMT1 protein (Wako, no. 230-02461).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!