The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

155 protocols using ceftazidime

1

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antimicrobial susceptibility was tested using the standard agar dilution method recommended by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines (M100-S21) [25 ]. The breakpoint of biapenem was based on the recommended point of imipenem by CLSI. The following antimicrobial agents were tested: ampicillin, piperacillin, cefazolin, cefuroxime, ceftazidime, ceftriaxone, cefepime, ampicillin-sulbactam, piperacillin-tazobactam, cefoxitin, biapenem, imipenem, meropenem, amikacin, gentamicin, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, and fosfomycin (Chinese National Institute for the Control of Pharmaceutical and Biological Products). ESBL activity was determined by the double-disc diffusion method using ceftazidime (30 μg), ceftazidime plus clavulanate (30/10 μg) discs and cefotaxime (30 μg), and cefotaxime plus clavulanic acid (30/10 μg) discs (Oxoid Limited, UK) on Mueller-Hinton agar (Oxoid Limited, UK) [25 ]. The results of antimicrobial susceptibility testing were analyzed by WHONET5.6. The reference strains used for this study were E. coli ATCC 25922 and Klebsiella pneumoniae ATCC 700603.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Confirmatory ESBL Testing Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Extended-spectrum β-lactamase production were confirmed according to the CLSI confirmatory testing guidelines [12 ]. Briefly, confirmatory testing was performed on Mueller–Hinton agar (BD) using cefotaxime 30 μg, ceftazidime 30 μg, cefotaxime/clavulanic acid 30/10 μg and ceftazidime 30/10 μg (Oxoid, Remel Inc, USA) (Additional file 1). Quality control of the test procedures was performed with K. pneumoniae ATCC 700603 and Escherichia coli ATCC 25922.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Inducible AmpC β-Lactamase Screening

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Screening for the inducible AmpC β-lactamase was done by the method of Sanders et al. (1996) (link). This was done by placing cefoxitin disc (Oxoid, UK) at a distance of 20 mm from ceftazidime (Oxoid, UK) on the surface of MHA inoculated with the test organism. β-lactamase inducibility was recognized by blunting of the ceftazidime (Oxoid, UK) zone adjacent to cefoxitin (Oxoid, UK).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Confirmatory Testing for ESBL-producing E. coli

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The combined disc method was used for the confirmatory tests for ESBL-producing E. coli (CLSI, 2020 ). Therefore, the following discs were used: cefotaxime, 30 μg, cefotaxime + clavulanic acid, 30 + 10 μg; ceftazidime, 30 μg; ceftazidime + clavulanic acid, 30 + 10 μg (Oxoid, Basingstoke, United Kingdom). For the identification of pAmpC-producing E. coli, the cefoxitin disc (30 μg) was used. Additionally, the cefepime disc (30 μg) was also used. Moreover, all isolates were subjected to susceptibility testing by broth microdilution (VetMIC GN-mo, National Veterinary Institute, Uppsala, Sweden) to the following antimicrobial agents: ampicillin (1–128 mg/L), cefotaxime (0.016–2 mg/L), ceftazidime (0.25–16 mg/L), nalidixic acid (1–128 mg/L), ciprofloxacin (0.008–1 mg/L), gentamicin (0.12–16 mg/L), streptomycin (2–256 mg/L), kanamycin (8–16 mg/L), chloramphenicol (2–64 mg/L), florfenicol (4–32 mg/L), trimethoprim (1–128 mg/L), sulfamethoxazole (8–1,024 mg/L), tetracycline (1–128 mg/L), and colistin (0.5–4 mg/L). The E. coli ATCC 25922 was used as a control strain. Isolates were considered to be wild-type or non-wild-type based on epidemiological cut-off (ECOFF) values defined by EUCAST1. ECOFF separates wild-type populations from isolates that have developed reduced susceptibility for the antimicrobial and may differ from clinical breakpoints used for clinical settings (EFSA, 2017 ).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Detection and Confirmation of ESBL Production

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The detection of ESBL production involves two steps, which are the screening test and confirmation. For the screening test, the disk diffusion method was used [30 ]. Three individual cephalosporin disks, including cefotaxime (30 μg) (Oxiod, Hampshire, UK), cefpodoxime (10 μg) (Oxiod), and ceftazidime (30 μg) (Oxoid) were placed on Muller Hilton (MHA) (Difco) agar plates, which were fully spread with a bacterial suspension prepared in 0.9% NaCl solution at 0.5 McFarland standard. The MHA plates were incubated at 37°C for 24 hr. The diameter of the inhibition zone was measured and analyzed according to the CLSI standard. Subsequently, the bacterial isolates, which were resistant to at least one single cephalosporin, were confirmed using the combination disk diffusion method. Two single cephalosporin disks containing cefotaxime (30 μg) (Oxiod) and ceftazidime (30 μg) (Oxoid) were applied in combination with clavulanic acid (10 μg) (Oxiod) to confirm the presence of ESBL production. The isolates were identified as producing ESBL if the difference in diameter of the inhibition zones between the individual cephalosporin disks and the disks with added clavulanic acid was greater than 5 mm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Screening and Confirming ESBL-Producing Isolates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
ESBL production was initially screened and confirmed using disk diffusion method in all the Salmonella and E. coli isolates [46 ]. Initial screening was performed using ceftazidime (30 ug), cefotaxime (30 ug) and cefpodoxime (10 ug) (Oxoid, Hampshire, England). All the isolates resistant to at least one of the indicator cephalosporins were subjected to confirm ESBLs production by using combination disk diffusion method with ceftazidime (30 µg) and cefotaxime (30 µg) alone and in combination with clavulanic acid (10 µg) (Oxoid). A difference of ≥5 mm between the inhibition zone of the cephalosporin/clavulanic acid combination and corresponding cephalosporin disks alone was interpreted as positive ESBL phenotype E. coli ATCC 25922 was used as a quality control strain.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Phenotypic Screening for ESBL and MBL

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The presence of ESBL and AmpC phenotypes in the examined isolates were identified by double-disk susceptibility test (DDST) with ceftazidime (Oxoid, England, distributed by Argenta, Poznań, Poland) and cefotaxime (Oxoid) as indicators, and amoxicillin (Oxoid) and clavulanic acid (Oxoid) as inhibitors of ESBL. The MBL mechanism of resistance was detected by DDST with an EDTA disk, a disk containing a metallo-β-lactamase inhibitor and disks of ceftazidime (Oxoid) and imipenem (Oxoid), in accordance with the recommendations of the Polish National Reference Center for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Affairs (KORLD) based on EUCAST guidelines [6] .
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Bacterial Growth Media and Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Bacterial growth media including brain heart infusion agar, Mac Conkey agar, eosin methyl blue agar, sugarsbroth, triple sugar iron agar, urea broth, methyl red media, Voges-Proskauermedia, and Mueller Hinton agar (MHA) were obtained from Oxoid (Hampshire, UK). Paper discs containing standard antibiotics namely ampicillin 10 µg, amoxycillin 25 µg, chloramphenicol 30 µg, cefuroxyme 30 µg, cefotaxime 30 µg, cefoperazone 75 µg, cefepime 30 µg, meropenem 10 µg, amikacin 30 µg, tetracycline 30 µg, ciprofloxacin 5 µg, levofloxacin 5 µg, co-trimoxazole 25 µg, and ceftazidime 30 µg were purchased from Oxoid (Hampshire, UK). Reagents (chrystal violet, 96% ethanol, iodin, safranin O, ammonium oxalate, oksalat, para-dimethylaminobenzaldehyde, butanol, acid chloride, α-naphtol 5%, KOH 40%, and distilled water) were supplied by Microbiology Laboratory, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Sumatera Utara (Medan, Indonesia).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing of GNB

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Susceptibility testing of the GNB was examined by the Kirby–Bauer disk diffusion assay on Mueller-Hinton agar medium (Oxoid, England) against 18 antibiotic disks following the Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute guidelines [17 ]. The following antibiotics were examined: amikacin (30 μg), amoxicillin/clavulanate (20/10 μg), aztreonam (30 μg), cefepime (30 μg), cefotaxime (30 μg), cefoxitin (30 μg), ceftazidime (30 μg), cefuroxime (30 μg), ciprofloxacin (5 μg), colistin (10 μg), gentamicin (10 μg), imipenem (10 μg), meropenem (10 μg), nitrofurantoin (50 μg), piperacillin(100 μg), piperacillin/tazobactam (100/10 μg), tobramycin (10 μg), and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (23.75 μg/1.25 μg) (Oxoid, England). In brief, standardized suspension of each isolate conforming 0.5 McFarland turbidity was inoculated onto two Mueller-Hinton agar plates. Then, nine antibiotic disks were placed onto each plate with recommended distance, followed by overnight incubation at 37°C. The strain of E. coli ATCC 25922 was used as control and was tested each time when susceptibility testing was performed.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Antibiotic Susceptibility Profiling of Isolates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All the identified isolates were subjected to susceptibility testing against amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (30 µg), ampicillin (10 µg), cefepime (30 µg), cefotaxime (30 µg), ceftazidime (30 µg), ceftriaxone (30 µg), cefuroxime (30 µg), ciprofloxacin (5 µg), gentamicin (10 µg), imipenem (10 µg), meropenem (10 µg), nitrofurantoin (10 µg), piperacillin (100 µg), sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim (1.25/23.75 µg), and tetracycline (30 µg) (Oxoid, UK) using the Kirby-Bauer method on Mueller Hinton Agar (MHA) (Oxoid, UK). Zone sizes from the Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute guidelines were employed to interpret the results. Bacterial isolates which were resistant to three or more antibiotics from different classes were considered as MDR.24
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!