The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

66 protocols using anti myc 9e10

1

Immunoprecipitation and Immunoblotting Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were washed with ice-cold PBS and lysed on ice for 30 min in RIPA lysis buffer (150 mM NaCl, 5% Glycerin, 1% Triton X-100, 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH7.5). For each immunoprecipitation reaction, 0.2 ml of the cell lysate was incubated with 1 μg of antibody (anti-Myc, 9E10, Santa Cruz, sc-40; anti-HA, H6908, Sigma-Aldrich) at 4 °C for 4 h, and then incubated with 10 μl of protein A/G agarose beads at 4 °C for 1 h. The sediments were then subjected to SDS-PAGE and immunoblot analysis. The antibodies used in immunoblotting were as follows: anti-Myc (9E10, Santa Cruz,1:2000), anti-HA (H6908, Sigma-Aldrich, 1:2000), anti-Flag (F3165, Sigma-Aldrich, 1:15000), anti-LC3B (ab192890, Abcam,1:1000), anti-IFITM3 (11714-1-AP, Proteintech,1:5000), anti-STAT1 (14994T, Cell Signaling Technology, 1:1000), anti-pSTAT1 (Tyr701) (7649T, Cell Signaling Technology, 1:1000), anti-FOXP3 (14-7979-82, eBioscience, 1:3000), anti-FOXO1 (2880T, Cell Signaling Technology, 1:1000), anti-Phospho-FoxO1 (Thr24)/FoxO3a (Thr32) (9464T, Cell Signaling Technology, 1:1000), anti-AKT (60203-2-Ig, Proteintech, 1:5000), anti-p-AKT (9271T, Cell Signaling Technology, 1:1000), anti-GAPDH (60004-1-Ig, Proteintech, 1:8000), anti-β-Actin (66009-1-1g, Proteintech, 1:8000), anti-LaminB (66095-1-Ig, Proteintech, 1:8000).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Immunostaining Myc-tagged Cdc14 in Drosophila

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Testes were collected from 1–3-day-old males as previously described (Zamore and Ma, 2011 (link)). Testes were snipped at level 2 and immunostained as previously described (Sitaram et al., 2014 (link)). Anti-Myc (9E10, 1:100; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, catalog #sc-40) and anti-tubulin (DM1α, 1:200; Sigma-Aldrich, catalog #T6199) primary antibodies were used in combination with goat anti-mouse Cy2 secondary (1:400; Invitrogen, catalog #A-11004).
Localization of Myc-tagged Cdc14 protein in 0–2 embryos laid by females carrying the UASp-cdc14-myc and nanos-Gal4 transgenes was assessed by immunofluorescence using standard conditions. Anti-Myc (9E10, 1:100; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, catalog #sc-40) and rat anti-alpha tubulin (1:200; Accurate Chemical & Scientific, Westbury, USA, catalog #MCA77G) primary antibodies were used in combination with goat anti-mouse Cy2 (1:400; Invitrogen, catalog #A-11004) and goat anti-rat Cy3 (1:400; Abcam, catalog #ab6953) secondary antibodies.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Immunoprecipitation and Co-immunoprecipitation Assays

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For immunoprecipitation experiments, cell lysates were prepared with lysis buffer A and precleared with protein G-Sepharose beads (GE Healthcare) at 4 °C for 1 h. Precleared lysates were incubated with an appropriate antibody [anti-Flag M2 (Sigma, F1804; 3 µg/sample) or anti-Myc 9E10 (Santa Cruz, sc-40; 1 µg/sample) antibody] for 3 h with gentle rotation. protein G-Sepharose beads were then added and incubated for 1 h. Immunoprecipitates were collected by centrifugation and washed three times with lysis buffer A containing 0.1% SDS and subjected to SDS-PAGE. For co-immunoprecipitation assays, cells were harvested with lysis buffer B and sonicated using Qsonica Q700 (QSonica) and centrifuged. The supernatants were incubated with an appropriate antibody [anti-Myc 9E10 antibody (Santa Cruz, sc-40; 1 µg/sample) or mouse control IgG1 G3A1 (CST, 5415; 1 µg/sample)] overnight at 4 °C. Protein G-Dynabeads (Thermo Fisher) were then added and incubated for 1 h. Immunoprecipitates were washed three times with lysis buffer B. Proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotted with the indicated antibodies.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Western Blot Immunoanalysis Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunoblotting analyses were carried out as described previously24 (link). Digital images were captured using the LAS-1000 Plus (Fujifilm). The following primary antibodies were used: mouse anti-Flag M2 (Sigma), anti-Myc 9E10 (Santa Cruz), and anti-β-actin 2F3 (Wako); rabbit anti-Myc and anti-SP-B (Santa Cruz), anti-CtBP1, anti-CtBP2, anti-SP-C, anti-Muc1 and anti-Abca3 (Abcam), anti-Foxp1 (CST), anti-Foxp2 (Sigma), anti-phospho-ERK1/2 (CST), and anti-ERK2 (Santa Cruz). An affinity-purified anti-MCRIP1 antibody was made in-house as described previously24 (link). All antibodies were used at a dilution of 1:1000 for western blotting. Full size western blot images are shown in Supplementary Fig. 6.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Immunoprecipitation and Protein Detection

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
As previously described (33 (link)), the indicated strains were cultured in 50 ml YEAU and harvested at log phase. Cell pellets were then washed and cryogenically disrupted with FastPrep MP with two pulses (60 sec) of bead-beating in ice-cold lysis buffer (50 mM HEPES at pH 7.5, 140 mM NaCl, 15 mM EGTA, 15 mM MgCl2, 0.1% NP40, 0.5 mM Na3VO4, 1 mM NaF, 2 mM PMSF, 2 mM benzamidine, Complete proteinase inhibitor [Roche]). After clearing by centrifugation, protein concentrations were measured via Bradford assay and adjusted to 12 mg/ml. Anti-Flag M2 affinity gel (Sigma), anti-Myc (9E10 from Santa Cruz Biotechnology) or anti-Ccq1 rabbit serum plus IgG beads (Roche) was used for immunoprecipitation, followed by eluting with 30 μl 0.1 M glycine (pH 2.0) at room temperature for 10 min. The elute was immediately neutralized with 2 μl 2 M Tris–HCl, pH 8.0. SDS-PAGE (8%) and western blotting using monoclonal anti-Flag (M2-F1804, from Sigma), monoclonal anti-Myc (from Covance), monoclonal anti-PK (ab27671 from Abcam), anti-Ccq1 rabbit serum (16 (link)), or anti-Cdc2 (y100.4, from Abcam) were performed to detect protein–protein interaction as indicated.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Antibody Validation for Molecular Research

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Anti-YY1 (H414, sc-1703X) rabbit polyclonal antibody, anti-Myc (9E10) and anti-α-tubulin (sc-58666) monoclonal antibodies, rabbit total IgG (sc-2027) and mouse total IgG (sc-2025) were obtained from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (U.S.A.). Anti-Flag (M2)-agarose and anti-Flag M2 (F3165) monoclonal antibody were from Sigma (U.S.A.). Anti-p21 (10355-1-AP) was purchased from ProteintechTM Group (China, Wuhan). Anti-p53-15P and anti-p53-33P rabbit polyclonal antibodies were gained from Dingguo Changsheng Biotechnology Co. LTD. (China, Beijing). Anti-INO80 (residue 1–526 aa), anti-hArp8, anti-hIes6, anti-hIes2, anti-p53, and anti-GAPDH rabbit polyclonal antibodies were raised against bacterially expressed proteins (Jilin University). Anti-p53 monoclonal antibody was from ZYMED (13–4000). Anti-pericentrin (ab4448) rabbit polyclonal antibody was from Abcam (UK).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Inhibition of Sphingolipid Metabolism

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All general biochemicals were from Sigma (Poole, UK). ABC294640 was from MedChemExpress (USA). SKi and PF543 were from Merck Biosciences (Nottingham, UK). RB-005 and F-02 were synthesized as described previously [7 (link), 8 ]. MG132 was from Enzo Life Sciences (Exeter, UK). SK2 selective inhibitor (R)-FTY720 methylether (ROMe) was synthesized as described previously [16 (link)]. Antibodies were obtained as follows: anti-actin (#A2066), and anti-p53 (#P8999) from Sigma (Poole, UK); anti-myc (9E10) from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA), and anti-p21 (#2947) from New England Biolabs (Oxford, UK); anti-DES1 (EPR9680), antibody from Abcam; Anti-SK1 (lab reference number 48:2) antibody was custom made by Abcam using antigens detailed in [28 (link)]. DharmaFECT reagent, ON-TARGETplus SMARTpool® SK1, SK2 and DES1 siRNAs were from Dharmacon (Cromlington, UK). Scrambled siRNA (ALLSTARS Negative control) was from Qiagen (Crawley, UK).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Hedgehog Signaling Pathway Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
NIH3T3 cells were cultured in DMEM containing 10% Bovine Calf Serum (ATCC). HEK 393T and Sufu -/- MEF cells were cultured in DMEM with 10% Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS) (Sigma Aldrich). Shh treatment was done by serum starvation for 24 hours (0.5% Bovine Calf Serum), then adding a recombinant mouse Shh N-terminal fragment (R&D Systems #464-SH) at 1 ug/ml overnight. Smoothened agonist SAG (Sigma Aldrich) treatment was done at 200 ng/ml for 8–12 hours. Cell transfections were performed using PolyJet in vitro DNA Transfection Reagent (SignaGen) following manufacturer’s instruction. Immunoprecipitation, immunostaining, and western blot analyses were carried out as described previously [47 (link)]. The antibodies used in this study are listed as follows: anti-Myc (9E10, Santa Cruz Biotechnology), anti-β-galactosidase (A11132, Life Technologies), anti-acetylated tubulin (T7451, Sigma Aldrich), anti-mGli2 (AF3635, R&D Systems), anti-mGli3 (AF3690, R&D Systems), anti-mKapβ2 (Ab10303, Abcam), anti-α-tubulin (T9026, Sigma Aldrich), anti-Histone3 (Ab1791, Abcam), and anti-BrdU (B8434, Sigma Aldrich).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Quantifying AMPAR Surface Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HEK293T cells (ATCC Cat# CRL-11268, RRID:CVCL_1926, Lot 58483269: identity authenticated by STR analysis, mycoplasma negative) were co-transfected with pN1-EGFP and AMPAR constructs using Effectene (QIAGEN; Germany). Two days post-transfection, cells were washed in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) and incubated with AF647 conjugated primary antibody (anti-myc 9E10, Santa Cruz Biotechnology; Dallas TX, RRID:AB_627268) for 30 mins on ice in PBS containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS). Antibody was removed and cells were washed further in PBS before resuspension in PBS containing 10% FBS and 1:1000 DAPI. Flow cytometry was performed using a LSR II flow cytometer (BD; Franklin Lakes, NJ). AF647 fluorescence was quantified and represents construct surface expression. Cells either positive for DAPI fluorescence or negative for EGFP fluorescence were discarded from analysis as dead or untransfected. AF647 fluorescence of untransfected cells was measured and subtracted during quantifications of surface expression.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Immunoblotting with Various Antibodies

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A rabbit polyclonal anti-GFP protein (GFP; Molecular Probes), anti-Flag (ABR) and mouse monoclonal anti-flag M2 (SIGMA) antibodies were used. Anti-actin (I-19), anti-GAPDH (6C5), anti-GFP (B-2) and anti-Myc (9E10) antibodies were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology. Anti-Tara antibody and Anti-Ndel1 antibody were purchased from Thermo scientific (PA5-29092) and Proteintech (17262-1-AP). Anti-Trio antibody and Anti-DISC1 antibody were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnologies (D-20) and Millipore (Q2269477), respectively. For immunoblotting, cells were lysed in Nonidet P-40 (NP-40) lysis buffer (50 mM Tris, pH 8.0; 150 mM NaCl, 1% NP-40, 5 mM EDTA, 5 mM glycerol-2-phosphate, 2 mM sodium pyrophosphate, 5 mM NaF, 2 mM Na3VO4, 1 mM DTT, EDTA-free protease inhibitor mixture [Roche]) and pre-cleared by centrifugation for 10 min at 12,000 g. Supernatants were denatured in SDS sample buffer by boiling for 5 min and subjected to sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE), followed by immunoblotting. For detection, films or the LAS 4000 (Fuji film, Tokyo, Japan) were used. For quantification, images were acquired with a Luminescent image analyzer Las-4000 (Fujifilm) and analyzed with image J software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!