The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Stripping buffer

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific
Sourced in United States, Austria

Stripping buffer is a solution used in Western blot analysis to remove primary and secondary antibodies from a membrane. It allows the membrane to be reprobed with different antibodies, enabling the detection of multiple proteins from a single sample.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

117 protocols using stripping buffer

1

Protein Isolation and Western Blot Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Proteins were isolated from HAoSMCs using ice-cold Pierce IP lysis buffer containing complete protease and a phosphatase inhibitor cocktail (all from Fisher Scientific, Vienna, Austria). Protein concentration was measured using the Bradford assay (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Vienna, Austria) [37 (link),38 (link)]. Equal amounts of proteins incubated in Roti-Load1 Buffer (Carl Roth, Karlsruhe, Germany) for 10 min at 100 °C were separated on SDS-PAGE gels and transferred to PVDF membranes. Membranes were incubated with primary rabbit anti-RUNX2 (1:1000, Cell Signaling, Frankfurt am Main, Germany, #8486) or rabbit anti-GAPDH (1:1000, Cell Signaling, Frankfurt am Main, Germany, #2118) antibodies overnight at 4 °C and then with secondary anti-rabbit HRP-conjugated antibody (1:1000, Cell Signaling, Frankfurt am Main, Germany) for 1 h at room temperature, before being stripped in stripping buffer (Fisher Scientific, Vienna, Austria) at room temperature. Bands were detected with the ECL detection reagent (Fisher Scientific, Vienna, Austria) and quantified using the ImageJ software (NIH, Rockville, MD, USA, 1.52n). Data are shown as the ratio of total protein to GAPDH and were normalized to the control group [14 (link),21 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Western Blot Protein Detection

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tissues were grinded in liquid nitrogen and lysed in RIPA buffer with cocktail of protease inhibitor. The lysates were loaded into 12% SDS-PAGE gel under reducing condition. Proteins were electrotransferred onto a nitrocellulose membrane. The membranes were blocked, probed separately with affinity-purified pp65 Ab or anti-ORF2-specific Ab for 1 h, followed by incubation with HRP-conjugated rabbit anti-mouse or donkey anti-rabbit antibody. All blocking, incubation, and washing were performed in 5% non-fat milk and 0.05% Tween 20 in PBS. Proteins were visualized by the enhanced chemiluminescence detection (Pierce) method according to the instructions of the manufacturer. For reprobing, the blots were first incubated in stripping buffer (Fisher) for 15 min at room temperature and then washed fully to remove residual reducing agent.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantitative Western Blot Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total proteins were isolated using an ice-cold Pierce IP lysis buffer (Fisher Scientific, Vienna, Austria) supplemented with complete protease and a phosphatase inhibitor cocktail (Fisher Scientific, Vienna, Austria) [36 (link),38 (link)]. The protein concentration was determined by a Bradford assay (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Vienna, Austria). Equal amounts of protein were incubated in Roti-Load1 Buffer (Carl Roth, Karlsruhe, Germany) at 100 °C for 10 min and then separated on SDS-PAGE gels and transferred to PVDF membranes. The membranes were incubated with primary rabbit anti-β-catenin (1:1000, #8480, Cell Signaling, Frankfurt am Main, Germany) or rabbit anti-GAPDH (1:1000, #2118, Cell Signaling, Frankfurt am Main, Germany) antibodies at 4 °C overnight and with a secondary anti-rabbit HRP-conjugated antibody (1:1000, Cell Signaling, Frankfurt am Main, Germany) at RT for 1 h. The membranes were stripped in a stripping buffer (Fisher Scientific, Vienna, Austria) at RT. Bands were detected with an ECL detection reagent (Fisher Scientific, Vienna, Austria) and quantified using ImageJ software ((NIH, MD, USA, 1.52n). The data were shown as the ratio of the total protein to GAPDH, normalized to the control group [38 (link),39 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Analyzing ORAI3, NUR77, and IKAROS in CD4+ T Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
CD4+ naive T cells (2 × 106) were lysed on ice with RIPA buffer (Thermo Scientific) supplemented with phosphatase (sodium orthovanadate) and proteinase inhibitor cocktails (Roche, 33576300) and phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (Santa Cruz Biotechnology). Total protein (10 µg) was separated on 4–15% gradient SDS gels and then transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes. ORAI3, NUR77, and IKAROS were detected with the respective Abs. Membranes were stripped with stripping buffer (Invitrogen) and re-probed with anti-β-actin Abs. For TCR signaling experiments, CD4+ naive T cells or Jurkat cells stably transduced with ORAI3 shRNA, control shRNA, or ORAI3 were stimulated with AA or on immobilized 100 ng anti-CD3/CD28 Abs, lysed at indicated time points, and probed for p-CD3ζ (Y142), CD3, p-CAMKII, CAMKII, p-ERK (Thr202/Tyr204), ERK, and NUR77 by immunoblotting.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Immunoblot Analysis of Naïve CD4 T Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Two million CD4 T-naïve cells from from young (aged 20–35 years) or older (aged 65–80 years) healthy donors or naïve CD4 T cells transfected with siYY1, siYY1/pre-miR-181a, siYY1/siDUSP6, siYY1/siSIRT1, or control siRNA and stimulated by anti-CD3/CD28 were lysed on ice with RIPA buffer (Thermo Scientific) supplemented with the phosphatase inhibitor sodium orthovanadate and the proteinase inhibitor phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (Santa Cruz Biotechnology). Ten micrograms total protein was separated on 4–15% gradient sodium dodecyl sulfate gels and transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes. Membranes were incubated with primary antibodies specific for YY1, DUSP6, SIRT1, and pERK, respectively, then horse radish peroxidase-labeled secondary antibody and developed with Pierce ECL Western blotting substrate (Thermo Fisher Scientific). For loading control, the membrane was stripped with stripping buffer (Invitrogen) and re-probed with anti-β-actin antibodies. Uncropped immunoblot images are included in Supplementary Figs. 24.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Modulation of T Cell Signaling Pathways

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Two million naive CD4 T cells from young or old healthy donors were treated with GSK3β inhibitors BIO (1 µM) or SB216763 (5 µM) for 48 h; in some experiments, cells were transfected with miR-181a inhibitor or miRNA inhibitor negative control before treatment. Cells were placed on ice and lysed with RIPA buffer (Thermo Scientific) in the presence of phosphatase and protease inhibitors, sodium orthovanadate, and PMSF (Santa Cruz Biotechnology). Approximately 10 µg of total protein was loaded in each well of SDS-PAGE gels and transferred to PVDF membranes. Membranes were incubated with primary antibodies specific for TCF1, DUSP6, and pERK, then HRP-labeled secondary antibody and developed with Pierce ECL Western blotting substrate (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Membranes were stripped with stripping buffer (Invitrogen) and the loading controls were re-probed with anti-β-actin antibodies.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Activation and Characterization of Recombinant KLK7

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Recombinant human proKLK7 was produced and purified from yeast cells as described earlier (Stefansson et al., 2008). The enzyme was then activated using thermolysin, and the activity was routinely tested against a fluorogenic substrate (data not shown). Quiescent cells were treated with recombinant active recombinant KLK7 at different concentrations and for various time periods as indicated in the Results section. Cells were lysed with RIPA buffer as described (Darmoul et al., 2004). Equal amounts of extracts (25 μg) were separated by SDS/PAGE and transferred onto a nitrocellulose membrane. Membranes were incubated in blocking buffer (20 mm Tris, 50 mm NaCl) containing 5% (w/v) low‐fat milk and 0.1% (v/v) Tween 20 and then probed with a monoclonal phospho‐specific antibody directed to ERK1/2 (1 : 2000) overnight at 4 °C. Membranes were stripped in stripping buffer (Invitrogen) and reprobed with a polyclonal anti‐ERK1/2 antibody (1 : 1000) that recognizes total ERK1/2 regardless of its phosphorylation state as loading controls. Proteins were revealed applying the Signal® Chemiluminescent Substrate (Thermo Scientific) on an Image Quant imaging system.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Western Blot Analysis of p53 and GAPDH

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Equal amounts of cell lysates were resolved on SDS–polyacrylamide gels and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes using a semi-dry blotter (Bio-Rad). Membranes were blocked using Tris-buffered saline with 5% nonfat milk (pH 8.0; Sigma). Blots were then probed with primary p53-DO1 antibody (Sigma) and POX antibody (ProteinTech) at a dilution of 1:5000 in blocking buffer, and subsequently by a secondary antibody conjugated to horseradish peroxidase (1:10,000). All blots were washed in Tris-buffered saline with Tween 20 (pH 8.0; Sigma) and developed using the enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) procedure (Pierce, USA). Blots were then stripped using stripping buffer (Invitrogen) at 37 °C for 15 min and probed for GAPDH as loading control using anti-GAPDH antibody (Sigma) at a dilution of 1:5000. The blots were developed using anti-rabbit or anti-mouse secondary antibodies (BioRAD, USA) at a dilution of 1:10,000. Densitometry analyses were performed using Image studio version 5.2 software (LI-COR). Data were normalized to levels of GAPDH expression.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Western Blot Analysis of Protein Levels

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To evaluate protein levels, cell lysates were separated by SDS-PAGE and analyzed by Western blot as described10 (link). Briefly, cell pellets or snap-frozen tissues were homogenized in a lysis buffer containing 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 6.8–7.5, 2 mM EDTA, 0.5% SDS, and freshly added 2-mercaptoethanol. Tissue homogenates were centrifuged at 12,000 g for 15 min at 4 °C, and the supernatants were collected. The total protein extracts were aliquoted to determine protein concentration using a protein assay dye reagent concentrate (Bio-Rad, CA, USA). About 100 μg total protein was separated by SDS-PAGE and then transferred to nitrocellulose membrane. The membranes were probed with the following antibodies against p22phox (1:500; sc-20781, Santa Cruz), GCLC (1:600; sc-28965, Santa Cruz), GR (1:500; sc-13324, Santa Cruz), and β-actin (1:10000, Sigma-Aldrich), washed with PBST and then probed with their respective secondary antibodies conjugated to horseradish peroxidase for 1 h at room temperature. Autoradiography or the Odyssey Imaging System (LiCor Biosciences, Lincoln, NE) was used to visualize protein bands. Stripping buffer (Thermo, MA, USA) was used for sequential blotting and probing with other antibodies. ImageJ densitometry software was used to quantify individual bands.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Synaptic Protein Expression Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Synaptic proteins were assayed by western blot as described previously [2–4 (link)]. Briefly, aliquots of brain homogenates were mixed with equal volumes of Laemmi loading buffer and boiled prior to gel electrophoresis. Equal amounts of protein were loaded and separated using SDS-PAGE (4–20%; Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) and transferred onto polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membranes (Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA), which were then rinsed in TBST buffer and incubated overnight in TBST solution containing the primary antibody of interest (goat anti-PSD-95 and rabbit anti-synapsin-1; Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA). The next day, blots were incubated with the appropriate peroxidase-linked secondary antibody, followed by visualization of protein-antibody complexes using the enhanced chemiluminescence system (Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA), and digital images were developed using a Licor C-Digit blot scanner (LI-COR Biotechnology, Lincoln, NE, USA). Immunoreactive bands were compared densitometrically using the blot scanner’s software. Membranes were stripped off using a stripping buffer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Rockford, IL, USA), and then incubated with β-tubulin antibody (mouse anti-βIII-tubulin; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) used as the loading control.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!