The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Top10 chemically competent cells

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific
Sourced in United States

TOP10 chemically competent cells are a type of bacterial cells that have been treated to increase their ability to take up and incorporate foreign DNA, such as plasmids, during transformation. They are commonly used in molecular biology and genetic engineering applications for the cloning and propagation of recombinant DNA constructs.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

13 protocols using top10 chemically competent cells

1

Methylation Impacts on TERT Promoter Activity

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
TERT promoter regions were cloned into a pNL1.1 vector (Promega), transformed in TOP10 chemically competent cells (Lifetech), and verified by Sanger sequencing. To generate methylated versus unmethylated plasmids, 1 μg of plasmid was treated with SssI (NEB) or mock as per manufacturer’s instructions. To ensure complete methylation, plasmid DNA was treated with SssI twice. Cells in culture were seeded into 96 well plates and transfected in suspension using X-tremeGENE HP DNA Transfection Reagent (Roche). Transfection complexes were prepared such that each reaction contained 11 μl Opti-MEM, 59 ng empty pCR2.1-TOPO vector, 5 ng pGL4.53(luc2/PGK) vector (Promega), 1 ng pNL plasmid, and 0.12 μl HP transfection reagent. After 2 days, transfected cells were lysed in 50 ul passive lysis buffer (Promega), transferred to black 96 well plates, and measured for reporter activity by mixing 50 μl of ONE-Glo EX Luciferase Reagent and NanoDLR Stop & Glo Reagent sequentially as described in the Nano-Glo Dual Luciferase Assay System manual (Promega).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Bisulfite Sequencing of TERT Promoter

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNAs from cells were extracted using DNeasy (QIAgen). DNA (100 ng) was bisulfite converted using an EZ DNA Methylation Gold Kit (Zymo). Bisulfite converted DNA was eluted in 30 μl water, of which 10 μl was used for a 40 μl PCR reaction containing 1x Buffer, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 250 nM each dNTPs, 12.5 μg BSA, 6.25% DMSO, 5 units of Platinum Taq (Lifetech), 400 nM of forward and reverse primers (TertMut_BSF2_forward 5′-GAAAGGAAGGGGAGGGGTTGGGAGGG and TertMut_BSF2_reverse 5’-CCTCCACATCATAACCCCTCCCT) and 5 units of Platinum Taq (Lifetech). The following cycling conditions were used: 1 cycle of 95 °C for 3 min; 35 cycles of 95 °C for 30 s, 56 °C for 30 s, and 72 °C for 1 min; and 1 cycle of 72 °C for 5 min. Products were run on a 2% agarose gel, excised and cloned into the pCR2.1-TOPO vector system (Lifetech). The vectors were transformed in TOP10 chemically competent cells (Lifetech). Plasmid DNA was purified from colonies using a Plasmid Purification Kit (Qiagen), and subsequently analyzed by Sanger sequencing. Sanger bisulfite sequencing data were analyzed using a custom Java program called DNAMethylMap, which facilitates the analysis of Sanger bisulfite sequencing clones with virtually bisulfite converted reference amplicon sequences (B.K., S.Y., unpublished).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Genomic DNA Isolation and Cloning

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genomic DNA was prepared from cultured cells by resuspension in 100 μl of lysis buffer [10 mM tris-HCl (pH 8.2), 1 mM EDTA, 25 mM NaCl, and proteinase K (200 μg/ml)] and incubation in a thermocycler for 1 hour at 50°C followed by denaturation at 98°C for 10 min. Target sequences were cloned by PCR using Phusion high-fidelity DNA polymerase (New England Biolabs) according to the manufacturer’s recommendations and supplemented with an additional 2.5 mM MgCl2 (35 cycles: 96°C, 30s; 50°C, 30s; 72°C, 30s). PCR products were gel-purified, cloned into the pCR-Blunt II-TOPO vector (Invitrogen), and transformed into Top10 chemically competent cells (Invitrogen). After transformation, single colonies were isolated for sequencing. To assess homozygosity of single-cell samples, a minimum of five colonies were sequenced per sample. For identification of mutant cell lines, a minimum of 20 colonies were analyzed.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Cloning and Sequencing Bacterial Genes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PCR products for all bacterial genes (16S rRNA, cbbL, and aprA) were cloned separately for each individual worm using the pCR4-TOPO plasmids and TOP10 chemically competent cells (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) according to the manufacturer's protocol. Clones were selected for the correct insert size and sequenced, and sequences grouped in clone groups as described in reference 44 (link). PCR products for amplified host genes were sequenced directly.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Functional Characterization of Tomato OLP Gene

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To functionally characterize some defense-related genes that are potentially contributing to TSWV resistance in the Sw-7 line, tomato OLP (PR5) gene was selected for evaluation. A synthetic gene (OLP or GFP) was designed (IDT, Coralville, IA) and inserted into pENTR-D TOPO vector and transformed into Top 10 Chemically competent cells (Invitrogen, USA). Plasmid DNA with inserts from selected colonies were confirmed through Sanger sequencing. Construct was recombined with Gateway vector PEG101 using clonase (Invitrogen, USA) between the Cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV) 35S promoter and nopaline synthase (NOS) terminator. The sequence confirmed OLP and GFP inserted binary vectors were mobilized into Agrobactrium tumefaciens strain LBA4404 by electroporation and selected on YM agar containing kanamycin for PEG101 selection and Streptomycin for Agrobacterium.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Amplification and Sequencing of Bacterial 16S rRNA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
About 1,400 bp of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene were amplified from the DNA and cDNA. Universal bacterial primers 8F (5′-AGAGTTTGATCMTGGCTCAG-3′) and 1406R (5′-ACGGGCGGTGTGTRC-3′) were used with hybridization at 55°C and 30 cycles. Purified PCR products (NucleoSpin® Gel and PCR clean-up, Macherey–Nagel) were used to construct a gene library with the TOPO-TA Cloning Kit and TOP 10 chemically competent cells (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, United States). To ensure good characterization of the dominant strains detected by CE-SSCP, positive transformants were analyzed by CE-SSCP to find correspondence of clones over the whole community. Based on their migration profile, seven clones were selected for sequencing the insert with vector primers T7 and T3 (Sanger sequencing by GATC Biotech). All seven sequences were submitted to NCBI GenBank under Accession Nos. MH686140 to MH686146.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Site-directed mutagenesis of ERBB2 variants

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A pcDNA3.1-ERBB2-WT plasmid was purchased from Addgene (ID16257, Watertown, MA, USA), and the cDNA of ERBB2 encoded on the plasmid was used as a template for site-directed mutagenesis. GENEART Site-Directed Mutagenesis System (Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA) was used to mutate A1963G to generate the ERBB2 I655V mutant, and A1960G/A1963G to generate the I654V;I655V double-mutant. The PCR products were digested with DpnI (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and transformed into TOP10 chemically competent cells (Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA). The I655V mutant, I654V;I655V mutant and wild-type ERBB2 plasmids were verified by DNA sequencing. A plasmid with cDNA encoding MCHERRY in place of ERBB2 was used as a confirmation for transfection efficiency and a control plasmid in all the transfection experiments.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Site-Directed Mutagenesis Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The reference allele templates for site-directed mutagenesis were sequence-verified entry clones containing putative regulatory elements. The mutagenesis primers containing the pre-designed mutations were designed with a web tool (http://primer.yulab.org/). The mutagenesis reactions were carried out following the Clone-Seq pipeline [62 (link)]. Each mutagenesis reaction contained a reference allele template and its corresponding mutagenesis primers. The products of the mutagenesis reaction were DpnI-digested and transformed into TOP10 chemically competent cells (Invitrogen). The transformants were spread on LB-spectinomycin agar plates and incubated at 37°C overnight. Single colonies yielded from the mutagenesis were picked, propagated, and sequence-verified before they were used in downstream experiments.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

RNAi Knockdown in C. briggsae

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Portions of the highly conserved Cbr-ceh-18 and Cbr-vab-1 genes (Figure 5—figure supplement 2A) were amplified from C. briggsae (strain AF16) genomic DNA and the DsRed transgenic marker (from JU1018 genomic DNA) using Platinum HiFi Supermix (Invitrogen) and the following primers:
Cbr-ceh-18: 5’-GGTCCTCGAGGTATTCACCAACGGCAACAAC-3’ and 5’-GCGTACTAGTGGTCCTCTTCCTTCTTCTCTTG-3’
Cbr-vab-1: 5’-GGTCCTCGAGAGTGTGGATCCGTTGTGATG-3’ and 5’-GCGTACTAGTGGAAATCCAACTCACCCTATGA-3’
dsRed: 5’-GGTCCTCGAGGAACGTCATCACCGAGTTCAT-3’ and 5’-GCGTACTAGTGATGGTGTAGTCCTCGTTGTG-3’
The PCR products and the L4440 vector were digested with SpeI and XhoI (New England Biolabs). Ligation was performed with T4 ligase (New England Biolabs). The ligation products were first transformed into TOP10 chemically competent cells (Invitrogen). After verification of the plasmids by Sanger sequencing, the correct plasmids were transformed into chemically competent HT115 E. coli. HT115 bacteria containing these plasmids were used for RNAi knock-down by feeding in C. briggsae (mfIs42[Cel-sid-2; Cel-myo-2::DsRed]) (see ‘Lifespan Assays’ above).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Ghrelin Splicing and GOAT Expression Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RT-PCR primers (Table 2) were designed to examine the splicing pattern of preproghrelin mRNAs (encoded by GHRL), as well as the expression of the ghrelin acylation enzyme GOAT (encoded by MBOAT4). Preproghrelin variants were amplified using primers in the terminal coding exons (exons 1 and 4) of the canonical (wild-type) preproghrelin coding sequence. RT-PCRs were performed using 200 ng cDNA, and 1 U Platinum Taq HIFI Polymerase (Invitrogen) in a final volume of 50 μL using a PTC-200 thermal cycler (MJ Research), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. RT-PCR products were separated by electrophoresis on a 2% agarose gel in Tris-acetate-EDTA (TAE) buffer, stained with ethidium bromide and visualised using ultraviolet light.
RT-PCR products were purified using a PureLink PCR Purification Kit (Invitrogen), or a MinElute PCR Purification kit (QIAGEN), cloned into pTargeT (Promega), and transformed into TOP10 chemically-competent cells (Invitrogen). Sequencing reactions were as outlined above.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!