The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Inveon rodent model scanner

Manufactured by Siemens
Sourced in United States

The Inveon rodent model scanner is a preclinical imaging system designed for the study of small animals, such as mice and rats. It is a non-invasive tool that allows researchers to visualize and analyze various physiological processes and structures within the subject's body. The Inveon scanner utilizes advanced imaging technologies to capture high-resolution images and data, which can be used to support research in areas like drug development, disease modeling, and biomedical engineering.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

23 protocols using inveon rodent model scanner

1

Targeted PET Imaging of Breast Tumors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All animal studies were conducted under a protocol approved by the University of Wisconsin Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. PET scans at various time points postinjection (p.i.) using a microPET/microCT Inveon rodent model scanner (Siemens Medical SolutionsUSA, Inc.), image reconstruction, and region-of-interest (ROI) analysis of the PET data were performed similar as described previously.34 Quantitative PET data were presented as percentage injected dose per gram of tissue (% ID/g). 4T1 murine breast tumor-bearing mice, a fast-growing tumor model with high CD105 expression on the tumor vasculature, were each i.v. injected with ∼10 MBq of 64Cu-CuS@MSN-TRC105 (targeted group, dose: ∼1 mg/kg) or 64Cu-CuS@MSN (nontargeted group, dose: ∼1 mg/kg) via tail vein before serial PET scans. Another group of four 4T1 tumor-bearing mice were each injected with 1 mg of unlabeled TRC105 at 1 h before 64Cu-CuS@MSN-TRC105 (dose: ∼ 1 mg/kg) administration to evaluate the CD105 specificity of 64Cu-CuS@MSN-TRC105 in vivo (i.e., blocking group).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantifying VEGF Tumor Uptake via PET Imaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tumor-bearing mice were each injected with 5–10 MBq of 64Cu-NOTAMSN-PEG-VEGF121 or 64Cu-NOTA-MSN-PEG via tail vein before serial PET scans. PET scans on microPET/microCT Inveon rodent model scanner (Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc.), image reconstruction and ROI analysis of the PET data were performed using described previously procedures.33 (link) Quantitative PET data was presented as percentage injected dose per gram of tissue (%ID/g).
After the last time point at 22 h p.i., mice were euthanized and biodistribution studies were carried out to validate the %ID/g values and radioactivity distribution based on PET imaging in tumor-bearing mice. Blood, U87MG tumor, and major organs/tissues were collected and wet-weighed. The radioactivity in the tissues was measured using a gamma-counter (Perkin-Elmer) and presented as %ID/g (mean ± SD).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Preclinical Evaluation of 44Sc-Labeled Anti-EGFR Fab

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PET and PET/CT scans at various time points p.i., image reconstruction, and region-of-interest (ROI) analyses were performed using a microPET/microCT Inveon rodent model scanner (Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc.) and Inveon Research Workplace [IRW] vendor software, respectively, as described previously. 30 (link) Each tumor-bearing mouse was injected with 1.85-3.7 MBq of 44Sc-CHX-A″-DTPA-Cetuximab-Fab via the tail vein and static PET scans were performed. In order to improve the detection statistics and minimize inter-scan variability due to radioactive decay, 20 million coincidence events per mouse were acquired for every static PET emission scan (energy window: 350-650 keV; time window 3.432 ns; resolution 1.5 mm). Quantitative data is presented as percentage injected dose per gram (%ID/g) of tissue. Blocking studies were carried out to evaluate EGFR specificity of 44Sc-CHX-A″-DTPA-Cetuximab-Fab in vivo, in which a group of three mice bearing U87MG tumors were each injected with 2 mg of Cetuximab, 24 h before 44Sc-CHX-A″-DTPA-Cetuximab-Fab administration. Biodistribution studies were carried out after the last PET scans to validate the PET results. The radioactivity in the tissue was measured using a gamma-counter (Perkin Elmer) and presented as %ID/g.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

PET Imaging of VEGFR-2 Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PET imaging and data analysis were performed using the microPET/micro-CT Inveon rodent model scanner (Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc.) as previously described (21 (link),22 (link)). Each tumor-bearing mouse was intravenously injected with 5–10 MBq of 64Cu-NOTA-RamAb, and static PET scans were obtained at 3, 24, and 48 h after injection. Tracer uptake was reported as the %ID/g (mean ± SD; ≥ 3 mice per group).
Receptor blocking studies were performed to evaluate the specificity of 64Cu-NOTA-RamAb to VEGFR-2 in vivo. Briefly, 3 mice were each injected with 5–10 MBq of 64Cu-NOTA-RamAb 24 h after the administration of a blocking dose (50 mg/kg) of RamAb. At the last time point (48 h), biodistribution studies were performed to validate the PET data. Radioactivity in tissues and organs was measured using a γ-counter (PerkinElmer).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

PET Imaging of Tumor VEGF Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tumor-bearing
mice were each injected with 5–10 MBq of 64Cu-NOTAMSN-PEG-VEGF121 or 64Cu-NOTA-MSN-PEG via tail vein before serial
PET scans. PET scans on microPET/microCT Inveon rodent model scanner
(Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc.), image reconstruction and ROI
analysis of the PET data were performed using described previously
procedures.33 (link) Quantitative PET data was
presented as percentage injected dose per gram of tissue (%ID/g).
After the last time-point at 22 h postinjection (p.i.), mice were
euthanized and biodistribution studies were carried out to validate
the %ID/g values and radioactivity distribution based on PET imaging
in tumor-bearing mice. Blood, U87MG tumor, and major organs/tissues
were collected and wet-weighed. The radioactivity in the tissues was
measured using a γ-counter (PerkinElmer) and presented as %ID/g
(mean ± SD).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

PET Imaging of Hindlimb Ischemia using 64Cu-RGO-IONP-PEG

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PET scans were performed using a microPET/microCT Inveon rodent model scanner (Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc.). Procedures for image acquisition and reconstruction and region-of-interest (ROI) analysis of the PET data were described previously [24 (link)]. Quantitative PET data were presented as %ID/g. Hindlimb ischemia model mice received an intravenous injection of ~10 MBq of 64Cu- RGO-IONP-PEG via tail vein before serial PET scans.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

PET Imaging of 64Cu-Labeled LDH-BSA in 4T1 Tumors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Serial PET scans of 64Cu-LDH-BSA were performed in 4T1 tumor-bearing mice (n = 3) using a microPET/microCT Inveon rodent model scanner (Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc.), at different time points (0.5 h, 3 h, 16 h , and 24 h) post-injection (p.i.) of 64Cu-LDH-BSA via tail vein. Data acquisition, image reconstruction, and region-of-interest (ROI) analysis of the PET data were performed as previously described13 (link)42 (link)43 (link). Quantitative data of ROI analysis on tumor and other organs were presented as percentage injected dose per gram of tissue (%ID/g). To validate the labeling and imaging of 64Cu-LDH-BSA, 64Cu-BSA was also scanned in 4T1 tumor-bearing mice (n = 3) as a control group. After the last scan at 24 h p.i., mice were sacrificed under anesthesia for biodistribution studies. Tumor, blood and major organs/tissues were collected and weighted. The radioactivity in the tissue was measured using a γ counter (PerkinElmer) and presented as %ID/g (mean ± SD).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

In Vivo PET Imaging of Zirconium-89 Nanoparticles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For in vivo PET imaging, 150 μL (∼400 μCi or 14.8 MBq) of 89Zr-MSN (or 89Zr-dSiO2) in water was i.v. injected into healthy BALB/c mice (n = 3). PET scans at various time points p.i., from 0.5 h to 21 days, were performed by using a microPET/microCT Inveon rodent model scanner (Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc.). The images were reconstructed using a maximum a posteriori algorithm, with no scatter correction. ROI analysis of each PET scan was performed using vendor software (Inveon Research Workplace [IRW]) on decay-corrected whole-body images, as we described previously,40 (link) to calculate the percentage injected dose per gram of tissue (%ID/g) values in mouse liver and bone.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Radiolabeling and PET Imaging of FeSe2/Bi2Se3-PEG

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
64Cu was produced with an onsite cyclotron (GE PETtrace). 64CuCl2 (150 MBq) was diluted in 300 μL of 0.1 M sodium acetate buffer (pH 5.5) and mixed with 30 μL of FeSe2/Bi2Se3-PEG (1 mg/mL). The reaction was conducted at 37 °C for 60 min with constant shaking. The labeling yield was determined by thin-layer chromatography (TLC) at different time points. The resulting 64Cu-FeSe2/Bi2Se3-PEG was purified by a PD-10 column using PBS as the mobile phase.
Serum stability study was carried out to ensure 64Cu is stably attached on FeSe2/Bi2Se3-PEG for in vivo PET imaging. 64Cu-FeSe2/Bi2Se3-PEG was incubated in PBS and complete serum at 37 °C for up to 24 h. At different time points, portions of the mixture were sampled and filtered through 100 kDa MWCO filters. The radioactivity that remained on the filter was measured after discarding the filtrate. The retained (i.e., intact) 64Cu on FeSe2/Bi2Se3-PEG was calculated using the equation (radioactivity on filter/total sampled radioactivity × 100%).
For PET imaging, 4T1 tumor-bearing mice (3 mice per group) post i.v injection of 5~10 MBq of 64Cu-FeSe2/Bi2Se3-PEG solution were performed using a microPET/microCT Inveon rodent model scanner (Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc.). Data acquisition, image reconstruction, and ROI analysis of the PET data were performed as described previously[32 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Quantitative PET Imaging of Tumor CD105

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PET scans and image reconstruction (maximum a posteriori (MAP) algorithm, no attenuation or scatter correction) were performed using a microPET/microCT Inveon rodent model scanner (Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc.) at various time points postinjection (p.i.) as described previously.38 (link)–40 (link) After each scan, region-of-interest (ROI) analyses were conducted in each mouse with Inveon Research Workplace. 64Cu-labeled targeted or nontargeted micelles were injected into each tumor-bearing mouse via the tail vein at a dose of 5 to 10 MBq per mouse before 3 to 15 min static PET scans were performed. Quantitative data were shown as percent injected dose per gram of tissue (%ID/g). For the competitive binding studies, one mg of competing TRC105 antibody was preinjected into four 4T1 tumor-bearing mice one hour before the 64Cu-labeled targeted micelles was administered to the mice in order to further assess the CD105 specificity in vivo. Biodistribution studies (mean ± SD) were conducted after the last PET scans using a gamma-counter (Perkin-Elmer) in order to validate the PET analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!