The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

9 protocols using anti cd19 pacific blue

1

Comprehensive PBMC Immunophenotyping Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PBMCs processing, staining and analysis were performed as mentioned above. PBMCs were stained using the following fluorochrome conjugated mouse anti-human monoclonal antibodies: APC-Cy7 anti-CD10, Pacific Blue anti-CD19 (BioLegend, San Diego, CA, USA), Alexa Fluor700 anti-CD27, FITC anti-IgM, PE anti-CD21, BV650-anti-CD19, APC-H7-anti-IgG, BV605-anti-IgM (BD-Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA), APC-anti-CD3, APC-anti-CD56, PE-Cy7-anti-CD20, PE-anti-CD38, PerCP efluor710 anti-CD1c (ebiosciences, San Jose, CA, USA), and FITC-anti-IgA (EMD Millipore, Temecula, CA, USA). Flow-cytometry data analysis quadrants were set based on the expression values obtained with fluorescence minus one (FMO) and isotype controls. Representative FMO staining controls can be viewed in Supplementary Fig. S4 and S5.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Flow Cytometric Analysis of B Cell Subsets

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell pellets from the enriched and column flow-through fractions were
re-suspended in FACS buffer (PBS + 5% FBS) and incubated with surface antibodies
for 30 min on ice. Surface antibodies included Pacific Blue–anti-CD19 (6D5;
BioLegend) or Brilliant Violet 650-anti-CD19 (6D5; BioLegend), Brilliant Violet
605-anti-CD86 (GL-1; BioLegend), Brilliant Violet 510-anti-CD69 (H1.2F3; BioLegend),
FITC-anti-CD21/35 (7E9; BioLegend), PE-Cy7-anti-F4/80 (BM8 BioLegend), PE-Cy7-anti-Thy1.2
(30-H12; BioLegend) and FITC anti-CD93 (AA4.1, Biolegend). Dead cells were excluded from
analysis wtih APC-eFluor® 780 Organic Viability Dye (eBioscience). After cell
surface staining, cells were washed twice with 3 mL FACS buffer and fixed in 1%
paraformaldehyde/FACS solution for cell surface marker analysis. Cells (300,000–1
X 106 /sample) were analyzed by flow cytometry. FACS data were acquired with an
LSRII FACS analyzer (BD Biosciences) and analyzed with FlowJo software (Tree Star Ashland,
OR). All flow cytometry analysis was carried out using a combination use of forward light
scatter and side scatter height, area, and width parameters to exclude aggregated cells. B
cell population gating strategy was carried out based on the method described by Allman
and Pillai (28 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Sorting and Phenotyping of B Cell Subsets

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Peripheral B cells were purified from the blood of patients and control donors by positive selection using CD20 magnetic beads (Miltenyi Biotec). For sorting, enriched B cells were stained with FITC-anti-IgM, PE-anti-IgG, PE-Cy7-anti-CD10, APC-anti-CD21, Pacific Blue-anti-CD19, and PercP-Cy5.5-anti-CD27 (all from BioLegend) (gating strategy is shown in fig. S21). Single- or batch-sorted CD19+CD21loCD10+IgMhiCD27 new emigrant and CD19+CD21+CD10IgM+CD27 mature naïve B cells from patients, heterozygous relatives, and HDs were sorted on a FACSAria flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson, Mountain View, CA) into 96-well polymerase chain reaction (PCR) plates or 5-ml round-bottom polystyrene test tubes, respectively. For phenotyping, enriched B cells were stained with FITC-anti-IgM, PE-anti-CD69, PE-Cy7-anti-CD10, APC-anti-CD86, PercP-Cy5.5-anti-CD27, APC-Cy7-anti-CD19 (all from BioLegend), and V450-anti-CD21 (BD Bioscience) (gating strategy is shown in fig. S22).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Flow Cytometry Analysis of Mouse Splenocytes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Single cell suspensions of spleens were prepared by mechanical dissociation of tissue through a 40-μm cell strainer. Red blood cells were then lyzed using ammonium–chloride–potassium lyses buffer (Lonza). Mouse blood leukocytes were collected by lysing red blood cells with ammonium–chloride–potassium buffer and centrifugation at 300g for 5 min. Cells were stained with fluorescent-labeled antimouse antibodies after blocking CD16/CD32 with Fc Block (BD Biosciences). Flow cytometry analysis was performed using following antibodies: Pacific blue anti-CD19, BV421 anti-CD19, APC anti-TCRβ, APC CXCR4, Percp Cy5.5 B220 (all from BioLegend), and PE–anti-CD138 (from BD biosciences). 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) and LIVE/DEAD Fixable Near-IR Dead Cell Stain Kit were purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific. APRIL-Alexa488 and bovine serum albumin-Alexa488 were prepared by conjugation of APRIL and bovine serum albumin to Alexa Fluor 488 NHS ester (Thermo Fisher). Stained cells or beads were analyzed using a flow cytometer (LSR II; BD), and data were analyzed using FLOWJO, version 10.1, for PC (Tree Star).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Cellular Activation Measurement for HIV

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cellular activation was assessed by measurement of HLA-DR and CD38, similar to previous studies (12 (link), 36 (link), 37 (link)). Staining for flow cytometry was performed both extracellularly and intracellularly. The extracellular staining cocktail consisted of LIVE/DEAD Amcyan fixable dye (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), anti-CD3-APC-H7, anti-CD4-BV605, anti-CD8-BV655, anti-CD14-Pacific blue (all from BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA), and anti-CD19-pacific blue (Biolegend, San Diego, CA, USA). The intracellular staining cocktail consisted of anti-CCR5-APC, anti-HLA-DR-PerCP-CY5.5 (all from BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA), anti-CD38-PE-CY7 (Biolegend, San Diego, CA, USA) and anti-p24-FITC (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA). PBMCs were collected at two time-points: day 3 (48 h post stimulation and prior to HIV infection) and day 5 (48 h post infection).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Profiling mRNA Translation in Leukemia

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
mRNA translation was analyzed using O-propargyl-puromycin (OPP)-labeling and polysome profiling, as described [22 (link)]. For analysis of CLL samples, cells were stained with anti-CD5-PerCyP5.5 and anti-CD19-pacific blue antibodies (BD Biosciences) for 15 min on ice and OPP-labeling was quantified in CD5+CD19+ cells. For PBMCs from healthy donors, cells were stained with anti-CD5-APC-Cy7, anti-CD19-pacific blue, anti-CD27-PerCP-Cy5.5 and anti-IgG-FITC antibodies (all Biolegend) for 15 min on ice, and OPP-labeling was quantified separately on CD5CD19+IgGCD27 and CD5CD19+IgGCD27+ cells. Polysome profiling was performed as described [22 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Multiparametric Flow Cytometric Analysis of B Cell Subsets

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Surface staining of PBMCs was performed with the following flourochrome conjugated monoclonal antibodies: anti-CD19 Pacific Blue, anti-CD10 APC, anti-CD20 APC-Cy7, anti-CD21 FITC, anti-CD27 PE (all Biolegend). Viability Live/Dead yellow dye (Invitrogen) was added to exclude dead cells from analysis. Whenever enough cells were available, corresponding isotype control (Biolegend) staining was also performed. In the event of insufficient cells to run isotype control internal gating controls using markers that provided the cleanest separation between populations were used. Data were acquired on LSRII flow cytometer (BD Biosciences) and analyzed using FlowJo 7.6.4 software (Tree Star, Ashland, OR). Lymphocytes were identified using forward and side scatter, and further gated to include only singlet events and live cells (Figure S1). CD19+ cells were subsequently gated to determine the following B cell subsets: CD10+CD27− immature transitional (IT), CD10−CD21+CD27− naïve, CD10−CD21+CD27+ resting memory (RM), CD20+CD21−CD27+ mature activated (MA) and CD10−CD21−CD27− tissue like memory (TLM). PBMC samples with less than 50% viability on trypan blue stain at the time of thaw or live/dead staining were discarded. 5×105–106 total events were captured. In addition there had to be at least 1000 CD19+ cells to analyze the B cell subsets.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Multiparametric Flow Cytometry Analysis of B Cell Subsets

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were stained with panels of antibodies including anti-mouse CD19-pacific Blue, CD138-APC, CD21-PEcy7, CD5-FITC, CD43-PE, IgD-APCcy7, CD38-PE-Cy7, GL-7-Percp (BioLegend, San Diego, CA ), and IgM-APCcy7 (Miltenyi Biotec, Auburn, CA). For the human B cell phenotypes, the following antibodies were used: anti-CD19-pacific blue, anti-CD38-PECy7, anti- CD20-PE, anti-CD27-APCcy7 (BioLegend), and anti– human IgG-PE, anti– human IgA-APC (Miltenyi Biotec). BD Cytofix/ Cytoperm and BD Perm/Wash (BD) were used for IgA and IgG intracellular staining per manufacturers’ instructions. Data were analyzed on a BD Biosciences LSRII machine and Flowjo software 29.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

BTK Inhibition Phenotypic Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
BTK inhibition with PF-06250112 was evaluated on splenocytes labeled with anti-CD86-FITC (BD Pharmingen, San Jose, CA, USA), and anti-B220-PE (BioLegend, San Diego, CA, USA). Phenotypic analyses were performed using anti-CD4-Alexa 700, anti-CD19-Pacific blue (Biolegend), anti-CD45-APC (eBiosciences, San Diego, CA, USA); anti-CD3e-FITC, anti-CD11b-PE (BD Pharmingen), anti-CD21-APC Cy7, anti-CD23-PE Cy7 and anti-GL7 Alexa 488 (Biolegend). Fluorescence activated cell sorting analysis was done on live cells using BD LSRII and FACSDiva software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!