The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Total rna isolation system

Manufactured by Promega
Sourced in United States

The Total RNA Isolation System is a laboratory equipment designed for the extraction and purification of total RNA from various biological samples. It utilizes a specialized protocol and reagents to efficiently isolate high-quality RNA, suitable for downstream applications such as gene expression analysis, reverse transcription, and next-generation sequencing.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

33 protocols using total rna isolation system

1

Drought-Induced Transcriptome Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was extracted from leaves of five plants that had been subjected to 10-day-drought or control treatments using Promega Total RNA Isolation System (Z3100). Then, mRNA was fragmented in the fragmentation buffer (Ambion). The first strand of cDNA was reversed transcribed with SuperScript II (Invitrogen) using random primer (TAKARA). Next, dTTP was replaced by dUTP for the synthesis of the second strand. The repaired double-stranded cDNA was ligated with Illumina TruSeq adaptor and digested using USER enzyme (NEB). Finally, 350–450 bp fragments were recovered and purified, and 18 cDNA libraries (3 accessions × 2 treatments × 3 replicates) were sequenced on the Illumina HiSeq 2500 platform.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Transcriptome Sequencing of Radial Nerve Cords in Asterias rubens

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Radial nerve cords (approx. 30 mg) dissected from a male adult specimen of A. rubens were used for RNA isolation (Total RNA Isolation System, Promega). Library preparation (TruSeqv2 kit, Illumina) was performed at the QMUL Genome Centre and sequencing was performed on an Illumina HiSeq platform at NIMR (Mill Hill), with cBot used to generate clusters. A total of 168 776 495 × 100 bp reads were obtained and raw sequence data (SRP068147; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra/SRP068147) were assembled using SOAPdenovo-Trans v. 1.0 (http://soap.genomics.org.cn/SOAPdenovo-Trans.html), a short-read assembly method developed by the Beijing Genomics Institute [35 (link)]. Contigs were assembled from reads with an overlap greater than 31 bp, which were then mapped back to the raw reads. The 326 816 contigs generated (with 16 316 over 1000 bp) were then set up for BLAST analysis using SequenceServer, which is freely available to academic users (http://www.sequenceserver.com) [36 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

RNA Extraction and qRT-PCR Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA of cell lines or tumor tissues was extracted by total RNA Isolation System (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). cDNA was reversely transcribed from 1 ug total RNA per sample using anchored oligo-dT primers (Reverse-iT First Strand Synthesis; ABgene). RT-qPCR was performed by using the LightCycler and the FastStart DNA Master SYBR Green 1 kit (Roche Applied Sciences). Primers of forward and reverse were tabulated in supplementary profile and chemically synthesized by Sangon Technology Company.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Bacterial Transcriptome Analysis via RNA-seq

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was extracted from 6 bacterial samples (O_S29_1, O_S29_2, O_S29_3, S29_1, S29_2, S29_3) separately by a Total RNA Isolation System (Promega) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The quality of the RNA samples was examined using the Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer. Library construction and Illumina sequencing was performed by Novogene China. An RNA-seq analysis was performed according to the protocol recommended by the manufacturer (Illumina Inc.) (Qiao et al., 2016 (link); Liu et al., 2019 (link)).
For data analysis, RNA-Seq reads were mapped to the reference genome of S. aureus Newman (NC_009641). Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified by the edgeR package based on Genes with two criterions: |log2(fold change)| > 0.58499 (|fold change| >1.50003) and p < 0.05
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

RNA-Seq Analysis of Cecal Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In battery experiment 2, total 9 cecal samples (C, E, and P group, 3 cecal samples in each group) were used for RNA-Seq assay.
Total RNA was extracted separately by a Total RNA Isolation System (Promega) according to the manufacturer's protocol. The quality of the RNA samples was examined using the Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer. Library construction and Illumina sequencing was performed by Novogene China. An RNA-seq analysis was performed according to the protocol recommended by the manufacturer (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA) (Qiao et al., 2016 (link); Liu et al., 2019 (link)).
RNA-Seq reads were mapped to the reference genome of Gallus gallus (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/ena/data/view/GCA_000002315.5) for data analysis. Differentially expressed genes (DEG) were identified by edgeR package based on Genes with 2 criterions: |log2(fold change)| > 0.58499 (|fold change| > 1.50003) and P < 0.05. Comparison method between groups were: E vs C, P vs E.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantitative RT-PCR Analysis of Integrin Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was extracted from ECPCs using RNAgents (Total RNA Isolation System, Promega, Madison, WI) and quantified spectrophotometrically. A volume of 500 ng of RNA was then retrotranscribed using ImProm-II reverse transcriptase (Promega, Madison, WI). Aliquots of 2 μl of the cDNA were used for PCR amplification. The specific primers used for the identification of human αv, β3, and GAPDH were designed according to published human cDNA sequences in the Genbank database, using FastPCR software [50 (link)]: αv (forward5′-CTA TGA GCT GAG AAA CAA TGG TCC-3′ and reverse 5′GCT GCT CCC TTT CTT GTT CTT C-3′690-bp product); β3 (5′- GGG GAC TGCC TGT GTG ACT C-3′ and reverse 5′-CTT TTC GGT CGT GGA TGG TG-3′ 610-bp product); GAPDH (forward: 5′-ACC ACA GTC CAT GCC ATC AC-3′ and reverse: 5′-TCC ACC ACC CTG TTG CTG TA-3′, 452-bp product). PCR was carried out on a Perkin Elmer Thermal cycler. Ten microliters of each PCR products were visualized after electrophoresis in a 2 % agarose. cDNA products were evaluated on the basis of a standard PCR marker (Promega) and quantified by densitometric analysis using ImageJ software (NIH).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

HeLa Cell RNA Extraction and cDNA Synthesis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The cells were seeded into an M6 well plate with 10000 cells per well. After treatment with EEROP in 72 hours, HeLa cells were trypsinized and centrifuged 300 × g for 5 minutes to get the cells pellet. The RNA of HeLa cells was subsequently extracted with a Total RNA Isolation System from Promega based on the manufacturer's protocol. The results of RNA extraction were evaluated with BioDrop at a 260 nm wavelength. The synthesis of cDNA in this study was carried out using the GoScript Reverse Transcription System from Promega using the manufacturer's instruction. PCR for cDNA was performed in the total volume of 20 μL with 5 minutes at 25°C for the priming process, 1 hour at 42°C for the reverse transcription process, and 15 minutes at 70°C for inactivating the reverse transcriptase enzyme.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Transcriptome Analysis of Bacterial Cultures

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To prepare RNA for transcriptome analysis, single bacterial colonies were picked and grown in 5 mL of NYG medium at 28 °C for 24 h at 200 rpm. These cells were transferred into 50 mL of NYG medium again at 28 °C for 24 h at 200 rpm. RNA was harvested once the cell turbidity had reached an OD600 of 0.6, using a Total RNA Isolation System (Promega) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Contaminating genomic DNA was removed using RNase‐free DNase I and verified by PCR. RNA quantity was initially determined by a Nanodrop spectrophotometer ND‐8000 (NanoDrop Technologies, Wilmington, DE, USA), and RNA quality was assessed using an Agilent 2100 bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies, CA, USA). Total RNA was sent to Novogene (Beijing, China) for library construction and strand‐specific RNA sequencing. Sequencing libraries were generated using a NEBNext Ultra™ Directional RNA Library Prep Kit for Illumina (New England BioLabs) following the manufacturer’s recommendations, and sequenced on an Illumina (CA, USA) HiSeq 2000 platform. Clean reads were mapped to the reference genome. To eliminate the influence of different gene length and sequencing discrepancy on the calculation of gene expression, the RPKM (reads per kilobase per million mapped reads) method was used to calculate the gene expression levels.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

RNA-seq Analysis of A. baumannii

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
By using the Total RNA Isolation System (Promega), total RNA of six cell samples was extracted. The extracted RNAs quality was checked using Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer. Library construction and Illumina sequencing was undertaken by Novogene China.
All RNA-seq reads were aligned to the genome of A. baumannii ATCC 17978 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/assembly/GCA_000015425.1; accessed on 1 March 2007) for data analysis. Only genes with an adjusted p-value  <  0.05 and |fold change|  >  1.5 were regarded as differentially expressed genes (DEGs).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Identification of Putative Type II TA Systems in S. suis 2

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The putative type II TA systems in the S. suis 2 strain SC84 were predicted with TAfinder (http://202.120.12.133/TAfinder/TAfinder.php). In our work, S. suis 2 was grown to the mid-log-phase and was used to extract the total RNA. The total RNA was purified by using an SV (spin or vacuum) total RNA isolation system (Promega, Madison, WI, USA), according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The RNA integrity and concentrations were determined by agarose gel electrophoresis and NanoDrop, respectively. The cDNAs were generated from these RNA samples with HiScript II Q RT SuperMix (Vazyme, Nanjing, China). We used the specific primers (0547F/0548R, 0791F/0790R, 0792F/0791R, 0842F/0841R, 0860F/0861R, 1035F/1034R, 1349F/1348R, and 1821F/1820R) in Table S2 to confirm the co-transcription of putative toxin genes and antitoxin genes.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!