The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Mlct probe

Manufactured by Bruker
Sourced in United States

The MLCT probe is a type of atomic force microscopy (AFM) probe designed for Bruker's line of AFM systems. It is used for measuring the topography and physical properties of sample surfaces at the nanoscale. The MLCT probe features a silicon nitride cantilever with an integrated tip for high-resolution imaging and force measurements.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

8 protocols using mlct probe

1

Determining Cell Stiffness via AFM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell stiffness was determined with atomic force microscopy (AFM) Park XE-100 and analyzed with SPIP software. After 7 days cells cultured in static and flow conditions samples with live cells were analyzed with MLCT probes (Bruker Inc.) in liquid environment.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Force Spectroscopy of DSG2 Binding in Cardiac Myocytes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Force spectroscopy on living HL-1 cardiac myocytes was performed as described previously [35 (link)]. Briefly, eukaryotically expressed DSG2-Fc protein was coupled to Si3N4 AFM cantilevers (MLCT probes, Bruker, Calle Tecate, CA, USA) in a concentration of 0.15 mg/ml via a bifunctional polyethylene glycol spacer (acetal-PEG-NHS, Gruber Lab, Institute of Biophysics, Linz, Austria). Experiments were performed with the pyramidal-shaped D-tip (nominal spring constant: 0.03 N/m) clamped into a Nanowizard III atomic force microscope (JPK instruments, Berlin, Germany) mounted on an optical fluorescence microscope (Axio Observer D1, Carl Zeiss) at 37 °C. SPM Control v.4 software (JPK instruments) was used for data acquisition. Force measurements were performed in a region of 5 μm × 1.25 μm spanning the cell–cell contact area of HL-1 cells with following settings: 64 × 16 pixel grid, setpoint 0.2 nN, extend speed 5 μm/s, extend delay 0.1 s. To determine the binding force between the tip-coupled DSG2 and the proteins on the cell surface, the functionalized tip was repeatedly approached to and retracted from the surface. If binding between the tip and surface occurred, the force necessary to rupture the binding (termed as “unbinding force”) was detected by determination of the cantilever’s deflection. The same cell–cell border was compared before and after addition of digitoxin.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

AFM Imaging of Native Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To study fixed preparations, we used a sample nearly identical to the SEM method with glass slides serving as a substrate. The cells were scanned in a semi-contact mode in the air by Ntegra Spectra system (NT-MDT, Russia). To process the scanning results, we used the Topometrix software package (USA). The test involved the use of DNP probes (Bruker, USA) with a tip radius of 20 nm, front angle of 15°, resonance frequency 65 kHz, spring constant of 0.35 N/m.
The real-time AFM studies of native cells were carried out using the method described in a previous study (Pleskova et al., 2005 (link)). The morphology was studied in the vital state. The test involved the use of MLCT probes (Bruker, USA) with the tip radius of 20 nm, front angle 15°, and resonance frequency in fluid 14 kHz. After 30 min of control scanning, the QDs were added into the Petri dish in CL50 concentration (final concentration 0.025 mg/ml and 0.04 mg/ml for CdSe/ZnS-MPA and CdSe/CdZnS/ZnS-PTVР respectively).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Calibrating Atomic Force Microscope Probes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cantilever A was kept and the other five cantilevers of the MLCT probe (Bruker) were knocked out. All the experiments were performed in PBS solution. The fused silica was used to calibrate the probe's deflection sensitivity. Briefly, the force‐indentation curves were obtained on a relative hard sample based on contact mode. Afterward, the contact area between the probe and the sample within the force curve was selected to calculate the reflection sensitivity. The thermal tune mode was used to calibrate the K (elastic coefficient) of the probe. Then the thermal vibration energy of the cantilever was analyzed by a fitting curve. After obtaining deflection sensitivity and K, a complete picture of the standard roughness sample (RS‐15M) was captured using ScanAsyst mode to correct tip radius.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Atomic Force Microscopy for Cell Elasticity

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
AFM is performed using the MFP-3D-BIO system (Asylum Research, Oxford
Instruments). Cells are probed with the “C” tip of an MLCT probe
(Bruker) at room temperature. The sensitivity and spring constant of each probe
(11.5 to 14.5 mN/m) are calibrated before each experiment. Cells are plated on a
polystyrene petri dish coated with a thin layer of Matrigel (100 μg/ml)
approximately 24 hours prior to each experiment. Force curves are acquired by
indenting the central cytoplasmic region of 25 to 35 cells for each cell line.
To avoid possible contribution of adjacent cells, only single cells were probed.
Approach and retract speeds for all experiments are 5 μm/s. The elastic
modulus for each cell is determined by fitting force curves to the Hertz-Sneddon
model87 ,88 (link) using Asylum Research software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Atomic Force Microscopy of RBC Cytoskeleton

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
JPK Nanowizard I AFM (JPK Instrument AG, Germany) was used to image both the smeared samples and cytoplasmic-surface exposed samples. Smear samples were imaged in air contact mode using MLCT probe (Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA). Super sharp silicon probes (SSS-NCHR probes, Nanosensor, Neuchatel, Switzerland) with tip radius of about 2 nm were used to image RBC cytoskeleton in tapping mode9 (link). Height images were captured at a resolution of 256 × 256 pixels for 10 µm × 10 µm or 512 × 512 pixels for 1 µm × 1 µm areas. Individual spectrin filaments and mesh were analyzed using ImageJ for estimating the average lengths and sizes9 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

AFM Analysis of Nanogel Mechanical Properties

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
AFM force measurements were conducted using a MultiMode 8 AFM (Bruker) with an inverted optical microscope. The nanogels in 1 × PBS dispersion with or without light irradiation were dropped onto a monocrystalline silicon substrate. MLCT probe (Bruker) and cantilever A were used (f0 = 22 kHz, k = 0.07 N m−1). The force curves were measured in shooting mode, with the Z piezo working in a closed loop. Young’s modulus of the nanogels was calculated by applying the Sneddon-modified Hertz model.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

AFM-Based Quantification of Cellular Stiffness

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
An MFP-3D-Bio AFM (Asylum Research, Santa Barbara, CA) was used to take 90 × 90 μm force maps (Fig. 2a–d) of selected regions of interest within each sample. Each force map includes a 32×32 grid of separate force curves which were each acquired using a trigger point of 200 pN and indenting 250 nm at a rate of 600 nm s−1. Force curves can be fitted with different theoretical models in order to accurately estimate the elastic modulus of cell components23 . Thus, in order to calculate cortical stiffness, the first 100 nm of indentation in the force curves were fitted with the Hertz-Sneddon model with a pyramidal indenter33 . Data was collected on a minimum of 12 cells per condition for each experiment, as each ROI contained at least three cells from the monolayer. In addition to determining stiffness distributions of these monolayers, AFM imaging (Fig. 3a–d) was performed. 90×90 μm images were taken at .10Hz with a spacing of 0.352 μm between lines. All stiffness measurements were taken with TR400PB silicon nitride pyramidal tips with a height of 3 μm and a semi-included angle of 35 degrees (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan), and AFM images were taken using a MLCT probe (Bruker, Billerica, MA). Asylum Research’s software (Igor Pro 6.34A) was used for thermal tune calibration of the cantilever spring constant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!