The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

21 protocols using anti myc

1

Chromatin Immunoprecipitation Antibody Panel

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The following antibodies were used in this study: anti-H3K4me1 (Millipore Sigma 07-436, Burlington, MA, 1:2000), anti-H3K4me2 (Millipore Sigma 07-030, 1:1000), anti-H3K4me3 (Millipore Sigma 07-473 or 04-745, 1:2000), anti-H3 (Abcam 1791, Cambridge, UK, 1:3000), rat monoclonal anti-Ser2P CTD (3E10, Dirk Eick, 1:1000), rat monoclonal anti-Ser5P CTD (3E8, Dirk Eick, 1:3000), mouse monoclonal anti-CTD for total Rpb1 (8WG16, Buratowski lab, 1:1000), anti-Set1 (Santa Cruz, sc-101858, 1:1000), anti-TBP polyclonal antiserum (Buratowski lab, 1:3000), anti-Myc (MMS-150R-500, Covance, 1:2000), anti-β-Actin (Abcam 8224, 1:2000), anti-HA (3F10, Roche and 12CA5, 1:2000), anti-Gal4 DBD (sc-577, Santa Cruz, 1:1000).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Yeast Protein Coimmunoprecipitation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Coimmunoprecipitations were conducted on yeast nuclear extracts treated with benzonase (Millipore, 71205-25KUN) at 200 U/mL during 15 min. The extracts were clarified by centrifugation and incubated overnight with 10 μL of anti-Flag M2 beads (Sigma, A2220) or 30 μL of anti-Myc (Covance, MMS-150R) protein-A sepharose beads (GE, 17-0780-01). The immunoprecipitated proteins were subsequently analyzed by anti-Flag, anti-Myc, or anti-H3 Western blots.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Detecting Protein-Protein Interactions in N. benthamiana

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The cDNAs of PARP1, PARP2, PARG1 and PARG2 were cloned into the GFP-tagged pGWB405 and/or myc-tagged pGWB417 Gateway destination vectors [81 (link)] and the resulting constructs were transformed into A. tumefaciens GV3101(pMP90). Leaves of 4–5 week-old N. benthamiana plants were agroinfiltrated with OD600 0.4 of the resulting A. tumefaciens strains, and some samples were then infiltrated two days later with 2 μg/ml of bleomycin solution. Tissues were harvested three days after agroinfiltration and total proteins were prepared in extraction buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl (pH7.5), 150 mM NaCl, 5 mM EDTA, 0.2% Triton X-100, 10% glycerol, and Sigma-Aldrich plant protease inhibitor cocktail at 1:100). Immunoprecipitation was carried out with anti-GFP (Abcam) at 4°C overnight followed by incubation with protein A beads (Thermo Scientific) for 1–2 h. The beads were washed three times with extraction buffer without protease inhibitors. The precipitated proteins were eluded with the SDS loading buffer, subjected to SDS-PAGE and immunoblotted with anti-myc (Covance) and anti-GFP (Clontech) antibodies, and detected using Supersignal West Pico or Dura chemiluminescent substrates (Thermo Scientific).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Cellular Interaction of HOIP with IpaH Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To test cellular interaction of HOIP with IpaH1.4/2.5, Cys to Ser mutations in IpaH proteins (IpaH1.4C368S, IpaH2.5C368S, IpaH4.5C379S, IpaH7.8C357S and IpaH9.8C337S) were generated by Quickchange mutagenesis (Stratagene). GFP-IpaHC/S proteins were co-expressed with Myc- or Flag-tagged HOIP in 293T cells. 38 h after transfection cells were collected, washed once in cold PBS and lysed in buffer containing 25 mM Tris-HCl (pH7.4), 150 mM NaCl, 1% Triton, 1x protease inhibitor (Sigma Aldrich). Lysate was first pre-cleared with 15 μl ProteinA agarose beads (Thermo Scientific) for 1h. To IP Myc-HOIP or Flag-HOIP 2 μg anti-Myc (Covance) or anti-Flag (Sigma Aldrich) antibody was added for 1h followed by addition of 15 μl Protein-A agarose beads for 1.5h. Beads were then washed 10 times in lysis buffer and 50 μl 2x SDS loading buffer (Biorad) was added. For mapping experiments IP was performed using 2 μg anti-GFP antibodies (Clontech).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Protein Immunoblotting Procedure

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Proteins were extracted in the presence of trichloroacetic acid, separated on 8–15% SDS-PAGE gels, and transferred to nitrocellulose membrane. Membranes were incubated with anti p-Ser5 (Millipore clone 3E8, 04-1572), anti p-Ser2 (Millipore clone 3E10, 04-1571), anti Rpb1 (8WG16 Covance, MMS-126R), anti Pgk1 (Invitrogen 459250) anti-H3 (Abcam Ab1791), anti-H3K36me3 (Abcam Ab9050), anti-Flag (Sigma F3165), anti-Myc (Covance MMS-150R), anti-Tap (Open Biosystems CAB1001) and anti His (Clontech 631212). Ponceau red staining and Pgk1 signal were used to determine equal loading.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Protein Extraction and Detection

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells grown in YES medium were mixed with trichloroacetic acid at a final concentration of 10% and harvested. Collected cell pellets were then suspended in 10% trichloroacetic acid and vortexed vigorously with 0.5-mm-diameter zirconia beads for 5 min at 4°C. After breakage, cell suspensions were centrifuged at 800 × g for 10 min, and the supernatant was discarded. The remaining pellets were suspended in the SDS sample buffer containing 0.5 M Tris-HCl (pH 8.0) and boiled for 5 min, followed by centrifugation at 17,700 × g for 15 min. The recovered supernatant was separated by SDS-PAGE, transferred to nitrocellulose membrane, and probed with primary antibodies listed as follows; anti-phospho-p70 S6K (1:5000; Cell Signaling Technology) for phosoho-Psk1 (Thr-415) detection, anti-Spc1 (1:10000),83 (link) anti-FLAG (1:5000; Sigma-Aldrich) and anti-DYKDDDDK (1:5000; FUJIFILM Wako) for the FLAG-tagged protein detection, anti-myc (1:5000; Covance), anti-HA (1:2000; Roche) and anti-GFP (1:2500; Nacalai Tesque). Anti-rabbit IgG (H + L) HRP-conjugated (1:10000; Promega), anti-mouse IgG (H + L) HRP-conjugated (1:10000; Promega), and anti-rat IgG (H + L) HRP-conjugated (1:10000; Jackson ImmunoResearch) were used as secondary antibodies.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Protein Extraction and Western Blot Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Aliquots of the cell culture were first supplemented with 20× Fix (200 mM sodium azide and 5 mg/ml BSA) to a final concentration of 1× Fix and incubated for 15 min on ice. Cells were pelleted and then incubated in 0.1 M NaOH at RT for 5 min. Cell pellets were bead-beat in 150 µl/OD600 of urea buffer (8 M urea, 4% SDS, 1 mM EDTA, 5% β-mercaptoethanol, and 100 mM Tris, pH 6.8) and incubated at 55°C for 15 min. Samples were subjected to SDS–PAGE, followed by Western blotting using the following antibodies: anti-Erg1 and anti-mCherry (provided by Chao-Wen Wang, Institute of Plant and Microbial Biology, Academia Sinica), anti-myc (9E10; Covance), anti-actin (MAB1501; Chemicon), and anti-Pgk1 (Abcam).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Comprehensive Antibody Validation Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Anti-BRUCE (BD, 611193; 1:500), anti-Ubiquitin (P4D1, Santa Cruz, sc-8017; 1:1,000), anti-Myc (9E10, Covance, MMS-150P; 1:1,000), anti-GFP (Santa Cruz, sc-9996; 1:1,000), anti-mCherry (Clontech, 632543; 1:1,000), anti-Alpha-Tubulin (Abcam, ab15246; 1:1,000), anti-Vinculin (Sigma-Aldrich, V9131; 1:1,000), anti-ATG5 (Cell signaling, 8540; 1:1,000), anti-LC3 (Nano Tools, 0260-100/LC3-2G6; 1:100), anti-GABARAP (E1J4E, Cell Signaling, 13733; 1:1,000), anti-GABARAPL1 (Abcam, ab86497; 1:500), anti-P62/SQSTM1 (MBL, PM045; 1:1,000), anti-LAMP1 (Abcam, ab24170; 1:1,000), anti-LAMP2 (Abcam, ab13524; 1:500), anti-ATG4B (Cell signaling, 5299; 1:1,000), anti-ULK1 (Santa Cruz, sc-33182; 1:500), anti-Beclin-1 (Cell Signaling, 3738; 1:1,000) and anti-EGFR (D38B1, Cell Signaling, 4267; 1:1,000) antibodies were purchased and used according to the manufacturer’s recommendations.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Protein Detection by Western Blot

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Protein was extracted from plant cells as described [34] (link), separated by SDS-PAGE, transferred to nitrocellulose, and then detected by ECL or ECL plus (GE Healthcare) using anti-ACIP1, anti-HA (Covance), anti-Myc (Covance), anti-His (Qiagen), or anti-GST (Santa Cruz) sera and horseradish peroxidase conjugated secondary antibodies (Bio-Rad). Membranes were stained with Ponceau S to control for loading.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Detecting TRIM25 Polyubiquitylation in HEK 293T Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HEK 293T cells were lysed in NP-40 buffer and then were centrifuged at 15,890g for 20 min. To detect the polyubiquitylation of TRIM25, cells were lysed in radioimmunoprecipitation assay (RIPA) buffer [50 mM tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 150 mM NaCl, 1% (v/v) NP-40, 0.5% deoxycholate, 0.1% SDS, and protease inhibitor cocktail]. For coimmunoprecipitations, 1 ml of postcentrifuged lysates was incubated with 0.5 to 2.5 μg of antibody at 4°C overnight, followed by incubation with a 50% slurry of protein A/G agarose (Amersham) for 2 hours at 4°C. Immunoprecipitated proteins were extensively washed with lysis buffer and were eluted with SDS–Laemmli buffer by boiling for 5 min. For Western blotting analysis, proteins were resolved by SDS-PAGE and were transferred onto polyvinylidene difluoride membranes. The following primary antibodies were used at 1:2000 dilution: anti-V5 (Invitrogen), anti-FLAG (M2; Sigma), anti-Myc (Covance), anti-GST (Sigma), anti-HA (HA-7; Sigma), monoclonal anti-TRIM25 (BD Biosciences), and anti–β-actin (Abcam). The following antibodies were used at 1:500 dilution: anti-USP15 (1C10; Abnova), anti-USP11 [GeneTex (clone EPR4346)], and anti-ubiquitin (P4D1; Santa Cruz Biotechnology). Protein bands were visualized with the enhanced chemiluminescence reagent (Pierce) and were detected by a luminescent imaging system (Fuji LAS-4000).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!