The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Snapgene

Manufactured by GSL Biotech
Sourced in United States, Australia

SnapGene is a software application designed for the visualization, analysis, and manipulation of DNA sequences. It provides a comprehensive set of tools for working with plasmids, genes, and other genetic constructs. The software allows users to view, edit, and annotate DNA sequences, as well as perform common molecular biology operations such as restriction enzyme digests, PCR primer design, and sequence alignment.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

88 protocols using snapgene

1

Bioinformatic Analysis of Bacteriophage Genomes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The obtained fastq raw reads of bacteriophage genomes of the forward and reverse were assembled using de novo using Geneious Prime version 2019.1.3 (Biomatters Ltd.). Assembled sequences were compared using blastn tool [28 (link)] with bacteriophage sequences available in GenBank using Geneious Prime version 2019.1.3 (Biomatters Ltd.) mapped and open reading frames (ORFs) were predicted using SnapGene® (GSL Biotech). Further analysis of predicted ORFs was conducted with BLASTp (NCBI) [29 ] tool using SnapGene® (GSL Biotech). The obtained genomes were additionally annotated with Rapid Annotation using Subsystem Technology (RAST) version 2.0 with RASTtk pipeline [30 (link)] accessed via the http://rast.nmpdr.org/ website with the default setting options. Further in silico analysis were performed for the presence of transfer tRNA and mRNA genes with the use of tRNAscan-SE using RAST [30 (link)], genes encoding for toxins and mycotoxins using ResFinder 3.1, ToxFinder 1.0 [31 , 32 ] and Virulence Finder 2.0 [33 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Lyn-FAK FRET Biosensor Construction

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The lipid raft/membrane–localized intramolecular Lyn-FAK FRET biosensor was provided by Y.W., University of California, Los Angeles (33 (link)). The Lyn-FAK biosensor was subcloned into the Gateway shuttle vector pENTR2b (Thermo Fisher Scientific, A10463) and amplified using competent Escherichia coli (DH5α, Thermo Fisher Scientific) cells. The pENTR2b-Lyn-FAK construct was then subcloned into the Gateway compatible PiggyBac transposon–based destination vector (pPBDEST51; Thermo Fisher Scientific, 12285011), by LR reaction using LR Clonase II as per the manufacturer’s instructions to generate pPBDEST-Lyn-FAK. All sequencing was performed in-house at the Garvan Molecular Genetics facility (Sydney, Australia) and verified using SnapGene (GSL Biotech: SnapGene.com">SnapGene.com).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Cas12a crRNA Design and Validation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The guide RNAs (gRNAs) for Cas12a consist of two regions: a direct repeat (DR) region which helps in tethering the crRNA to the Cas protein, and a spacer region which is directly involved in target DNA recognition. We designed different gRNA (spacer regions) for all three species and chose a spacer length of approximately 20 bp to maximise target specificity. The Protospacer Adjacent Motif (PAM) region is identified by the sequence 5’-TTTV-3’ (V=A, G, C), and gRNA complimentary protospacer guanine (G)/cytosine (C) content between 30% and 60%. We used SnapGene (GSL Biotech; available at SnapGene.com/">www.SnapGene.com) to design the crRNAs for each species, which were synthesized by IDT. We used the same COI sequences in order to design the crRNA and RPA primers and confirmed the specificity of each crRNA using NCBI BLAST. For each species, two crRNAs were designed and tested (see SI Appendix, Table S2 for more details on crRNA design).
We also tested Cas12a nucleases, including Lachnospiraceae bacterium ND2006 Cas12a (LbCas12a), Acidaminococcus sp. Cas12a (AsCas12a) and Eubacterium rectale Cas12a (ErCas12a), to determine trans-cleavage activity (SI Appendix, Table S4).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Backcrossing wild-type Drosophila rab mutants

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Serial backcrossing to a wild type (yw) background was performed for three consecutive generations. The single rab mutants as well as the respective balancer chromosomes, used to generate the final stocks, were backcrossed to the same genetic background. All mutant alleles, except rab3 and rab32, could be traced by their red fluorescent marker. Where direct tracing was not possible, backcrossing was performed ‘blindly’ and after three generations roughly 100 separate single (fe-)male stocks were generated and subsequently sequenced to identify the backcrossed rab3 and rab32 mutants.
The genomic DNA was amplified using the Phusion High-Fidelity PCR Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific) with the following primers for rab3 (Fwd: 5’-ACACTGAGGCGAGCTTACGC and Rev: 5’- CTACTACCGAGGAGCGATGGG) and rab32 (Fwd: 5’-GTAGACACGGGTCATGTTGCC and Rev: 5’-accagcaaatctcagtgcgg). The amplified DNA was extracted from agarose gel, cleaned using the NucleoSpin Gel and PCR Clean-up kit (Macherey-Nagel) and send for sequencing to Microsynth Seqlab GmbH (Göttingen, Germany). Sequencing results were visualized using SnapGene (GSL Biotech LLC). All primers were designed with SnapGene (GSL Biotech LLC).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Plasmid Construction Using Standard Cloning

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All plasmids used in this study were constructed using standard cloning methods such as restriction enzyme‐based cloning (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) or HiFi DNA assembly (New England Biolabs), following the instructions from the manufacturer. Standard molecular biology techniques were carried out for DNA manipulations such as DNA isolation, ligation, electrophoresis, cloning, competent cell preparation and transformation (Green & Sambrook, 2012 ). The oligonucleotides used in this study are listed in Table S2 and ordered from Integrated DNA Technologies (IDT, San Diego, CA, USA). PCR conditions were optimized for each primer pair, and gene fragments were amplified using Q5 High‐Fidelity DNA polymerase (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA, USA). Colony PCR was performed to confirm cloning success using Taq polymerase (New England Biolabs, Ipswich MA, USA). Subsequently, the selected clones were sequence‐verified using the Sanger Sequencing service (Genewiz, CA, USA). Commercial kits from Qiagen (Hilden, Germany) were used to isolate recombinant plasmids from E. coli and to separate PCR products (or concentrate DNA) from agarose gels (1% w/v). Primer designing (SnapGene, GSL Biotech; available at SnapGene.com">SnapGene.com), vector map generation (SnapGene), graph preparation (GraphPad Prism) and gene analysis (NCBI Blast) were performed using basic bioinformatics tools.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Hybrid Assembly of vanA-Encoding Plasmids

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Long-read MinION and paired-end short-read MiSeq FASTQ files were used for hybrid assemblies using Unicycler (v0.4.8).22 (link) The genetic organization of vanA-encoding plasmids from Irish isolates was determined following hybrid assembly and these were used as reference sequences for further analysis. MiSeq reads were mapped against reference plasmid sequences and percentage depth and breadth of coverage calculated using Burrows–Wheeler Aligner, SAMtools and BedTools.23–25 (link) Alignment quality was assessed using Tablet.26 (link)  vanA-encoding genomes resolved by hybrid assembly were annotated using RAST v2.0 (http://rast.nmpdr.org/)27 (link) and visualized using SnapGene (GSL Biotech; SnapGene.com">https://SnapGene.com). Irish VREfm and VSEfm sequence reads and sequences resolved by hybrid assembly have been deposited in GenBank under BioProject PRJNA734127. Danish VREfm sequence reads have been deposited in GenBank under BioProjects PRJNA573568, PRJNA686881, PRJNA691722, PRJNA702038 and PRJNA740173.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Sequence Analysis Protocol using SnapGene and BLAST

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Sequence analysis was carried out using the SnapGene (GSL Biotech; available at SnapGene.com">https://www.SnapGene.com) sequence analysis software package. The BLAST algorithm (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/BLAST) was used to search the DNA and protein database for similarity. Multiple sequence analysis was done using JALVIEW (Waterhouse et al., 2009 (link)) with the Clustal (Thompson et al., 1994 (link)) algorithm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Phylogenetic Analysis of SARS-CoV-2 Genomes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Phylogenetic analysis was performed by aligning the consensus sequence to 14,970 SARS-CoV-2 genomes retrieved from GISAID on 5/5/2020, 8:25:22 AM (https://www.gisaid.org/), using the FFT-NS-2 setting in MAFFT v7.429 (Katoh et al., 2019 (link); Shu and McCauley, 2017 ). Columns composed of more than 70% gaps were removed with trimAl v1.2rev59 (Capella-Gutierrez et al., 2009 (link)).
A maximum-likelihood phylogenetic tree was constructed from this alignment using IQTree in the Augur utility of Nextstrain (Hadfield et al., 2018 (link); Minh et al., 2020 ). The APE v5.3 package in R was used to re-root the tree relative to RaTG13 bat coronavirus genome sequence (Paradis and Schliep, 2019 (link)), and the tree was plotted using ggtree v3.10 package in R (Yu et al., 2017 ). The subtree, visualized in Figure 2B, was rendered in FigTree v1.4.4 (Rambaut, 2017 ).
Position specific mutation analysis was conducted in R using the BioStrings package (Pages et al., 2019 ), and chromatograms of Sanger sequencing reads were rendered in SnapGene (GSL Biotech; available at SnapGene.com">SnapGene.com).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Genomic Analysis of Colistin-Resistant Acinetobacter

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Colistin-resistant Acinetobacter spp. isolates were subjected to NGS (Macrogen, Korea), and the genome sequences of these strains were obtained using the Illumina HiSeqXten platform (USA). The acquired antimicrobial resistant gene and plasmid replicon typing were identified in silico using ResFinder 3.2 and the PlasmidFinder 2.1 webserver (https://cge.cbs.dtu.dk, accessed June 24, 2020), respectively [11 (link), 12 (link)]. The genome was annotated using RAST (http://rast.theseed.org/) to analyze the genetic environment of mcr [13 (link)]. BLAST was used to align the genetic sequences flanking mcr (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/BLASTih.gov/BL). The results were visualized using SnapGene (GSL Biotech; available at SnapGene.com). ISfinder was used to check the presence and type of the insertion sequence in a contig (database URL, http://www-is.biotoul.fr) [14 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Identification of Resistant Bacterial Isolates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The genera of 24 resistant isolates were confirmed by sequencing of the 16S rRNA. First, whole DNA was extracted from the isolates using the boiling method.24
To identify the isolates, PCR amplification (size of amplicon was 919 bp), purification and sequencing of the 16S rRNA were performed.25 ,26 Each nucleotide was assembled with SNAPGENE (GSL Biotech, available at SNAPGENE.com" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">SNAPGENE.com) and BioEdit (Version 7.2.5, available at bioedit.software.informer.com/7.2/) softwares. A partial sequence was used to compare 16S rRNA gene sequences in the nucleotide Basic Local Alignment Sequence Tools (BLAST) geneBank database (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi) for similarities. Sequences with similarity percentage ⩾99% were considered closely related species in terms of genus.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!