The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

119 protocols using zetasizer 3000hs

1

Nanoemulsion Characterization and Genistein Content

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The droplet size and the ζ potential of the nanoemulsions were determined by photon correlation spectroscopy and electrophoretic mobility, respectively (3000HS Zetasizer; Malvern Instruments, Malvern, England). The samples were diluted in water, for size, or in 1 mM NaCl solution, for ζ potential measurements. Morphological examination was performed by means of transmission electron microscopy (TEM). The formulations were diluted at a 1:10 ratio, obtaining an oil phase concentration equal to 1%. Specimens for TEM viewing were prepared by mixing samples with one droplet of 2% (w/v) uranyl acetate solution. The samples were then adsorbed to the 200 mesh Formvar-coated copper grids, left to dry, and examined by TEM (JEM-1200 ExII; JEOL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan).
The total genistein content was determined after the dilution of formulations in methanol. To estimate the genistein association, nanoemulsions were directly added to ultrafiltration membranes (100,000 Da cutoff, Ultrafree; Merck Millipore) and centrifuged at 15,000 rpm for 15 minutes. The association efficiency (%) was estimated by the difference between the total and free-genistein concentrations.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Comprehensive Physical Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A Visco-88 viscometer (Malvern Instruments, Malvern, UK) was utilised for viscosity, torque, shear stress, and shear rate measurements [56 (link)]. The Zeta potential was determent using a 3000HS Zetasizer (Malvern, UK). Surface tension was measured by a tensiometer (Sigma 703) [57 (link)]. All measurements were executed at room temperature.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Nanomaterials Characterization by DLS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The Ps and ζ potential of the nanomaterials (Cht, NG/SeNPs, and Cht/NG/SeNPs) were appraised through DLS “Dynamic Light Scattering” approach, employing Malvern 3000 HS Zetasizer (Malvern, UK). Samples' solutions in DW (0.02%) were sonicated for 20 min at 23 Hz, and their Ps/ζ potentials were measured within −200 and +200 mV range at RT.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Nanoemulsion Characterization and Hydrogel Formulation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The nanoemulsions were characterized by mean droplet size (MDS), polydispersity index (PDI), zeta potential (ZP) and pH. MDS, PDI and ZP were determined by photon correlation spectroscopy (PCS) and electrophoretic mobility, respectively (3000HS Zetasizer, Malvern Instruments, England). All the samples were diluted to 0.4:200 (v/v) with 1 mM NaCl before measurement. Also, pH was determined directly in the bulk for each formulation using a pHmeter Digimed 20, and viscosity was determined using an Ostwald capillary viscometer at 20 о C. The nanoemulsions morphology was assessed by transmission electron microscopy (TEM). After incorporation of nanoemulsions into hydrogels, the morphological examination was also performed using TEM. Further, the rheological characterization of the hydrogel formulations were carried out using a Brookfield LVLD-II+ rotational viscometer at room temperature (25 ± 1 о C).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Characterization of CSO-SA Micelles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The chemical structure of CSO–SA was determined with 1H nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy, and this chemical was dispersed in D2O at pH 7 and 25 °C. The substitution degree (SD%) of amino groups of CSO–SA, defined as the molar ratio of stearate to anhydroglucosidic units in chitosan oligosaccharide, was detected with TNBS, and the ultraviolet (UV) absorbance of the final reaction mixture at 344 nm was measured by UV spectroscopy (TU-1800PC, Beijing Purkinje General Instrument Co., Ltd., China). The critical micelle concentration (CMC) of CSO–SA was measured by pyrene fluorescence using a fluorometer (F-2500, Hitachi Co., Japan). The intensity ratio (I1 : I3) of the first peak (I1, 374 nm) to the third peak (I3, 385 nm) in the pyrene emission spectra was analyzed to calculate the CMC.
The size and zeta potential of CSO–SA micelles and CSO–SA/DrzBS micelles were measured by dynamic light scattering (Zetasizer 3000HS, Malvern Instruments Ltd., UK) in deionized water. Their morphology was examined by transmission electronic microscopy (TEM, Stereoscan, Leica, England).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Characterization of Dispersed SWCNTs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Different aqueous dispersions of SWCNTs were dispersed onto holey carbon film on copper grids. The sample morphologies were observed by transmission electron microscopy (TEM, JEM-200CX).
To determine particle size and zeta potential, a sample of 200 μL (with a concentration of 50 μg·mL−1) was dispersed in deionized water to a final volume of 3 mL. Particle size and zeta potential were measured using laser particle analysis (Malvern Zetasizer 3000HS). A volume-weighted Gaussian size distribution was fit to the autocorrelation functions to obtain the particle size and zeta potential values.
The atomic fractions of C, O, and N in the different SWCNTs samples were determined by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, Thermo Fisher Scientific). Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectra in the range from 500 to 4000 cm−1 were recorded with a FTIR spectrometer (Nicolet IS10). X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis was conducted using a BRUKER D8 X-ray diffractometer in the 2θ range of 0–100° at a scanning rate of 5°·min−1.
For atomic force microscopy (AFM) measurements, different SWCNT dispersions (ethanol/ultrapure water = 1:1) with a concentration of 0.01% were dripped on freshly cleaved mica and observed using an AFM (Dimension Icon, Bruker AXS).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Characterization of Ad Nanocomplexes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The average particle sizes and surface charges of naked Ad or Ad nanocomplexes (Ad/P5N5LG, Ad/P5N2LG-FA, or Ad/P5N5LG-FA formed with Ad:polymer molar ratio of 5 × 105) were determined by the Zetasizer 3000HS (Malvern Instrument Inc., Worcestershire, UK) with a He-Ne Laser beam (633 nm, fixed scattering angle of 90°) at room temperature. The surface charges of the nanomaterials (P5N5LG, P5N2LG-FA, and P5N5LG-FA) were measured by Zetasizer 3000HS as described above. The obtained sizes and surface charges are the average values of 3 runs for independently prepared triplicate of each sample.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Characterizing mPEG-PLGA Nanoparticles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The Z-Average size and zeta potential of DSF loaded mPEG-PLGA nanoparticles (DFSNPs) suspended in water were determined using dynamic light scattering (Zetasizer 3000HS, Malvern Instruments Ltd, UK). The particle size was determined using a He-Ne laser beam at a wavelength of 633 nm with a fixed scattering angle of 90° at 25°C. The data for a mean value for the size (z-Average) and a width parameter, Polydispersity Index (PDI) was evaluated using cumulants analysis. The PDI is a dimensionless, simple 2-parameter fit to the cumulants analysis and indicates the deviation of the measured autocorrelation function during the particle size estimation from that of monodisperse spheres having the same diameter. The PDI values range from 0 to 1. The zeta potential values were measured by laser Doppler velocimetry at 25°C at the default parameters of the dielectric constant, refractive index, and viscosity of water, using a disposable capillary cell with a volume of 1 mL. The morphology of the mPEG-PLGA nanoparticles was examined by transmission electron microscopy (Hitachi H-9500, Hitachi High Technologies America, Inc. Dallas, TX). Freeze-dried nanoparticles were dissolved in water with 0.05% Tween-80, and a small droplet was placed on a carbon-coated copper grid, followed by drying at room temperature before measurements were taken.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Microbubble Preparation via Vibration

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Microbubbles were prepared using a simple mechanical vibration method.16 (link) Briefly, 5 mg of DPPC, 2 mg of DSPE, and 0.5 mg of CHOL were dissolved in 500 µL of 10% glycerol solution in a vial. After heating in a water bath at 50°C for 30 minutes, the air in the vial was exchanged with perfluoropropane (C3F8; Research Institute of Physical and Chemical Engineering of Nuclear Industry, Tianjin, China), followed by vigorous shaking for 45 seconds via dental amalgamator (YJT; Shanghai Medical Apparatus and Instruments, Shanghai, China). Finally, the microbubbles were washed with PBS twice to obtain supernatant microbubbles via centrifugation at 500 rpm, and the concentration was then adjusted to 108 per mL. The particle size and potential of the microbubbles were analyzed using a laser particle size analyzer system (Zetasizer 3000 HS; Malvern Instruments). The morphological characteristics of microbubbles were analyzed using an inverted optical microscope (IX71; Olympus, Tokyo, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Nanoparticle Characterization by Zetasizer

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Size, ζ-potential, and PDI of all runs were measured in triplicate by using Zetasizer 3000 HS (Malvern Instruments, UK).24 (link)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!