The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Inspect f feg sem

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific
Sourced in Netherlands

The Inspect F FEG-SEM is a high-resolution field emission scanning electron microscope (FEG-SEM) designed for advanced imaging and analysis applications. The core function of this instrument is to provide high-quality, high-resolution images of samples at the nanoscale level.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

8 protocols using inspect f feg sem

1

Multimodal Characterization of Carbon Dots

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) was carried out on a FEI TECNAI 20 transmission electron microscope at 200 kV. The absorbance and fluorescence spectra were obtained on a BioTek Synergy MX multi-mode microplate reader. Scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) image was obtained using FEI G2 TECNAI F30 at 300 kV. The zeta potential and size distribution measurements were carried out on a Malvern Zetasizer Nano ZS system (Zeta potential +33.3mV, DLS 2.01nm). Energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) and element mapping were performed on a FEI Inspect F FEG-SEM equipped with EDZX EDS system to confirm Gd contents in the carbon dots. Inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) was used to analyze the Gd concentration in the sample for further study.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Scanning Electron Microscopy of Wound Dressing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) is a useful tool to understand the surface characteristics of a polymer. In the present study, microstructure and surface morphology of the wound dressing (before and after NO donor incorporation) were examined using SEM (FEI Inspect F FEG-SEM).35 A total of three samples of each of the control (without GSNO) and alginate–PVA–GSNO were sputter coated with gold–palladium (10 nm) using a Sputter Coater (Leica EM ACE200) after mounting them on a metal stub. An accelerating voltage of 5 kV was used to capture SEM images of the sample at 100× magnification.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

SEM Imaging of Polymer Composites

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The surface morphology and roughness of the polymer composites were examined by SEM (FEI Inspect F FEG-SEM). Dried composite samples were mounted on a metal stub with double-sided carbon tape and sputter-coated with 10 nm gold–palladium using a Leica EM ACE200 sputter coater. An accelerating voltage 5 kV was used for the experiment.
Microscopic images of S. aureus on the polymer composites were obtained after exposing the composites to S. aureus for 24 h. Bacteria were collected in the mid-exponential growth phase and were diluted with PBS buffer to attain 108 CFU mL−1. Subsequently, the polymer composites were incubated at 37 °C in 2 mL bacteria solution in a 24-well plate under shaking condition (150 rpm). After 24 h, the polymer composites were washed with PBS buffer to get rid of any planktonic or loosely attached bacteria. The composites were fixed with 3 % glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M PBS solution for 16 h. The samples were dehydrated with graded ethanol for 20 min (50, 60, 70, 80,90, and 100 vol. %). Finally, the samples were soaked and washed in HMDS and left to air-dry overnight in the fume hood away from light. Each sample was mounted and sputter-coated with gold-palladium, and random spots were chosen for imaging. The experiment was repeated three times using different passages of bacteria. Representative images have been shown.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Scanning Electron Microscopy of RBCs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The P-FRT-RBCs were dropped onto a filter paper with a pore size of 1 μm. The samples were primarily fixed by 2% glutaraldehyde in PBS at 4 °C for 1 h. After washing with PBS, the samples were incubated in 1% OsO4 for 1 h. Next, ethanol of gradient concentrations (25%, 50%, 75%, 90%, and 100%) was applied to the samples at room temperature (30 min for each concentration) to dehydrate the samples. Subsequently, the samples were critical-point dried in a SAM-DRl-790 CPD and diffuse-coated with a gold/palladium mix with a thickness of 5 nm in a low vacuum coater (Leica EM ACE 200). Finally, the samples were analyzed using a field emission gun SEM (FEI Inspect F FEG-SEM).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Visualizing Bacterial Cell Morphology Using Microscopy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The uniformity of the LBL polyelectrolyte coating was investigated using FITC-PAH and DAPI nucleic acid stains. A Nikon A1R confocal microscope with a CFI Plan APO VC 60× oil immersion objective with NA=1.4 and 0.13 mm working distance was used to image the M. pneumoniae cells. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of the uncoated bacteria were obtained using a Zeiss (Jena, Germany) 1450EP SEM. For the encapsulated cells, images were obtained using an FEI (Hillsboro, OR) Inspect F FEG-SEM. Samples for SEM were fixed as described elsewhere,30 (link) with modifications. Samples of cells were prepared by dispersing 100 μL of a cellular suspension on the surface of a glass coverslip pre-coated with poly-L-lysine and incubated overnight at 37°C. The samples were fixed in 2% glutaraldehyde in Na cacodylate buffer for one hour and then washed twice in Na cacodylate buffer for 5 min each. The samples were post-fixed in 1% OsO4 in Na cacodylate buffer for one hour, washed once afterwards with Na cacodylate buffer for 10 minutes, and then rinsed with water twice for 5 min. The SEM coverslips were treated with a sequential ethanol dehydration series (5 min each step) with 25, 50, 75, 85, 95, and 3× 100% washes, critical point dried, and sputter coated with Au for examination.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Analyzing Surface Morphology of Cu-SNAP Composite Films

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All configurations of the Cu-SNAP composite films were examined under a scanning electron microscope (SEM) (FEI Inspect F FEG-SEM) to study the surface morphology of the polymeric composite. The top coat solution of 3 wt% Cu-NPs in Carbosil (50 mg/mL) was cast into a film in a Teflon mold (d = 2.5 cm), dried, and examined for roughness using SEM. Dried film samples were mounted on a metal stub with double-sided carbon tape and sputter coated with 10 nm gold-palladium using a Leica EM ACE200 sputter coater. Images were taken at accelerating voltage 5 kV.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Electron Microscopy Sample Preparation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells grown with glucose or cellulose as the sole carbon source were fixed in 2% (v/v) glutaraldehyde in Sorenson’s buffer and fixing agent was removed by rinsing with Sorenson’s buffer. Cells were dehydrated through consecutive washes with 5%, 50%, 75% (v/v) and absolute ethanol. The cells were subjected to critical point dehydration in carbon dioxide using a Bal-tech critical point dryer (Polaron, Agar scientific, Essex, UK). Cells were mounted on a stub with a carbon disc, dried overnight and coated with gold using a SEM coating unit (Polaron, Agar scientific, Essex, UK) (15 nm as standard). The images were inspected using Inspect F FEG SEM (FEI, Netherlands).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Wear Debris and Surface Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In this study, an Inspect F FEG-SEM (FEI, Eindhoven, Netherlands) was used to characterize worn surfaces of the tested samples. Wear debris were assessed using an Alicona InfiniteFocusSL microscope (Alicona Imaging GmbH, Graz, Austria). The contact zone on the shaft after each test was examined by using an Optical Microscope (Zeiss Optical Microscope, Cambridge, UK). The bush mass was measured using a Sartorius Electronic Analytical Balance BP210D (accuracy 0.01 mg).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!