Spss 11.0 for windows

SPSS 11.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, Ill, USA) was used for all data analysis. The immunohistochemical results and their associations with clinical characteristics were analyzed using the chi-square test. Spearman’s rank test was used to analyze the correlation between protein phenotypes. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to analyze univariate survival, and comparisons of the survival distributions among groups were performed using the log-rank test. The prognostic significance of S100A7 expression with respect to other pathological variables was assessed using multivariate Cox regression analysis. The quantitative data are expressed as the mean ± S.D. Student t test was performed for 2 group comparisons, and analysis of variance test was performed when comparing 3 or more groups. All P values were 2-tailed, and values of P < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

The data were collected from several independent experiments, with three replicates per experiment. All data were expressed as means + sd. Statistical significant effects (p value <0.05) were examined using t test in SPSS 11.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).

All data were expressed as means (n = 4) ± standard error of mean (S.E.M.). Comparison between groups were carried out by one-way analysis of variance using SPSS 11.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Post-hoc Tukey’s honest (HSD) test was used to determine significant differences (p < 0.05).

Statistical analyses were performed using statistical package (SPSS 11.0 for windows, SPSS Inc, Chicago). Data are presented as mean and standard deviation, median and range as appropriate. The primary end point of the study was the need for rescue morphine of the patients in PACU. The secondary outcomes were the degree of sedation of the patients in PACU, incidence of postoperative vomiting, and the time to reach Alderete score of >9. The number of patients in each group was determined by a power calculation based on the results of Qlutoye AO et al. [2 (link)]. It was calculated that 35 patients needed per group assuming an α risk of 0.05 and a β risk of 0.10 and mean difference of 50%. To account for exclusion of some patients, we enrolled 40 patients in each group. Demographic data compared using the Student’s t-test. MAP, HR, SpO₂, MAC data were analyzed using two-way repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA). OPS, PAED, and PAED score were expressed as median values and compared with Mann-Whitney U test. Statistical significance was accepted when the P value was less than 0.05.