The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

7 protocols using symmetry c18 20 mm 180 μm trapping column

1

Proteomic Analysis by Q Exactive Plus MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Proteomic analysis was performed using a nano-Acquity UPLC system (Waters) coupled to a Q Exactive Plus Hybrid Quadrupole-Orbitrap mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific) via a nanoelectrospray ionization source. For each injection, the sample was first trapped on a Symmetry C18 20 mm × 180 μm trapping column (5 μl/min at 99.9/0.1 v/v water/acetonitrile), after which the analytical separation was performed using a 1.7 μm Acquity BEH130 C18 75 μm × 250 mm column (Waters Corp.) over a gradient of 3 to 30% acetonitrile (total run time 235 min) in 0.1% formic acid at a flow rate of 400 nanoliters/minute (nL/min) with a column temperature of 55°C. The mass spectrometer was operated in data-dependent acquisition (DDA) collecting MS/MS spectra for the top 10 ions with a charge greater than 1. MS1 (precursor) analysis was performed at 70,000 resolution, with an AGC target of 1×106 ions and a maximum injection time of 60 ms. Tandem mass spectra (MS/MS) were collected in a data-dependent manner on the top 10 most abundant precursor ions per MS1 scan, with dynamic exclusion enabled for a window of 20 seconds. Precursor ions were filtered with a 2.0 m/z isolation window and fragmented with a normalized collision energy of 27. MS2 scans were performed at 17,500 resolution, with an AGC target of 5 × 104 ions and a maximum injection time of 60 ms.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Nano-LC-MS/MS Proteomics Workflow

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All samples were subjected to nanoLC-MS/MS analysis using either a nano-Acquity (Waters) or an EASY-nLC UPLC system
(Thermo Fisher Scientific) coupled to a Q Exactive Plus Hybrid Quadrupole-Orbitrap mass spectrometer (Thermo Fischer
Scientific) via a nano-electrospray ionization source. Prior to injection, malonylpeptide sample was resuspended in 12
μL 0.1% formic acid and was analyzed with at least technical duplicate runs. For each injection of 4 uL, the sample was
first trapped on a Symmetry C18 20 mm × 180 μm trapping column (5 μl/min at 99.9/0.1 v/v
water/acetonitrile), after which the analytical separation was performed over a 90-minute gradient (flow rate of 400
nanoliters/minute) of 3 to 30% acetonitrile using a 1.7 μm Acquity BEH130 C18 75 μm × 250 mm column
(Waters Corp.), with a column temperature of 55°C. MS1 (precursor ions) was performed at 70,000 resolution,
with an AGC target of 1×106 ions and a maximum injection time (IT) of 60 ms. MS2 spectra (product
ions) were collected by data-dependent acquisition (DDA) of the top 20 most abundant precursor ions with a charge greater than
1 per MS1 scan, with dynamic exclusion enabled for a window of 30 s. Precursor ions were filtered with a 1.2
m/z isolation window and fragmented with a normalized collision energy (NCE) of 30. MS2 scans were
performed at 17,500 resolution, with an AGC target of 1×105 ions and a maximum IT of 60 ms.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Nano-LC-MS/MS Proteomics Workflow

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All samples were subjected to nanoLC-MS/MS analysis using either a nano-Acquity (Waters) or an EASY-nLC UPLC system
(Thermo Fisher Scientific) coupled to a Q Exactive Plus Hybrid Quadrupole-Orbitrap mass spectrometer (Thermo Fischer
Scientific) via a nano-electrospray ionization source. Prior to injection, malonylpeptide sample was resuspended in 12
μL 0.1% formic acid and was analyzed with at least technical duplicate runs. For each injection of 4 uL, the sample was
first trapped on a Symmetry C18 20 mm × 180 μm trapping column (5 μl/min at 99.9/0.1 v/v
water/acetonitrile), after which the analytical separation was performed over a 90-minute gradient (flow rate of 400
nanoliters/minute) of 3 to 30% acetonitrile using a 1.7 μm Acquity BEH130 C18 75 μm × 250 mm column
(Waters Corp.), with a column temperature of 55°C. MS1 (precursor ions) was performed at 70,000 resolution,
with an AGC target of 1×106 ions and a maximum injection time (IT) of 60 ms. MS2 spectra (product
ions) were collected by data-dependent acquisition (DDA) of the top 20 most abundant precursor ions with a charge greater than
1 per MS1 scan, with dynamic exclusion enabled for a window of 30 s. Precursor ions were filtered with a 1.2
m/z isolation window and fragmented with a normalized collision energy (NCE) of 30. MS2 scans were
performed at 17,500 resolution, with an AGC target of 1×105 ions and a maximum IT of 60 ms.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantitative LC-MS/MS Proteomics with FAIMS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Quantitative LC-MS/MS was performed on 3 μL using an MClass UPLC system (Waters Corp) coupled to a Thermo Orbitrap Fusion Lumos high resolution accurate mass tandem mass spectrometer (Thermo) equipped with a FAIMSPro device via a nanoelectrospray ionization source. Briefly, the sample was first trapped on a Symmetry C18 20 mm × 180 μm trapping column (5 μL/min at 99.9/0.1 v/v water/acetonitrile), after which the analytical separation was performed using a 1.8 μm Acquity HSS T3 C18 75 μm × 250 mm column (Waters Corp.) with a 90-min linear gradient of 5–30% acetonitrile with 0.1% formic acid at a flow rate of 400 nL/min (nL/min) with a column temperature of 55°C. Data collection on the Fusion Lumos mass spectrometer was performed for three difference compensation voltages (−40v, −60v, −80v). Within each CV, a data-dependent acquisition (DDA) mode of acquisition with an r = 120,000 (@ m/z 200) full MS scan from m/z 375–1500 with a target AGC value of 4e5 ions was performed. MS/MS scans were acquired in the ion trap in Rapid mode with a target AGC value of 1e4 and max fill time of 35 ms. The total cycle time for each CV was 0.66s, with total cycle times of 2 s between like full MS scans. A 20s dynamic exclusion was employed to increase depth of coverage. The total analysis cycle time for each injection was approximately 2 h.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantitative LC-MS/MS Analysis of Metabolites

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Quantitative LC/MS/MS was performed on 2 μL (16.6% of total sample) using an MClass UPLC system (Waters Corp) coupled to a Thermo Orbitrap Fusion Lumos high resolution accurate mass tandem mass spectrometer (Thermo) equipped with a FAIMSPro device via a nanoelectrospray ionization source. Briefly, the sample was first trapped on a Symmetry C18 20 mm × 180 μm trapping column (5 μl/min at 99.9/0.1 v/v water/acetonitrile), after which the analytical separation was performed using a 1.8 μm Acquity HSS T3 C18 75 μm × 250 mm column (Waters Corp.) with a 90-min linear gradient of 5 to 30% acetonitrile with 0.1% formic acid at a flow rate of 400 nanoliters/minute (nL/min) with a column temperature of 55C. Data collection on the Fusion Lumos mass spectrometer was performed for three difference compensation voltages (−40v, −60v, −80v). Within each CV, a data-dependent acquisition (DDA) mode of acquisition with a r=120,000 (@ m/z 200) full MS scan from m/z 375 – 1500 with a target AGC value of 4e5 ions was performed. MS/MS scans were acquired in the ion trap in Rapid mode with a target AGC value of 1e4 and max fill time of 35 ms. The total cycle time for each CV was 0.66s, with total cycle times of 2 sec between like full MS scans. A 20s dynamic exclusion was employed to increase depth of coverage. The total analysis cycle time for each injection was approximately 2 hours.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantitative Proteomics by 1D-LC-MS/MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Quantitative one-dimensional liquid chromatography, tandem mass spectrometry (1D-LC-MS/MS) was performed on 250 ng of the peptide digests per sample in singlicate, with additional QC and conditioning analyses as described in Table S1. Samples were analyzed using a nanoACQUITY UPLC system (Waters) coupled to a QExactive Plus high resolution accurate mass tandem mass spectrometer (Thermo) via a nanoelectrospray ionization source. Briefly the sample was first trapped on a Symmetry C18 180 μm × 20 mm trapping column (5 μl/min at 99.9:0.1 v/v H2O:MeCN) followed by an analytical separation using a 1.7 um ACQUITY HSS T3 C18 75 mm × 250 mm column (Waters) with a 90 min gradient of 5 to 40% MeCN with 0.1% formic acid (buffer B) at a flow rate of 400 nl/min and column temperature of 55 °C. Data collection on the QExactive Plus MS was performed in data-dependent acquisition (DDA) mode with a 70,000 resolution (@ m/z 200) full MS scan from m/z 375 to 1600 with a target AGC value of 1e6 ions followed by 10 MS/MS scans at 17,500 resolution (@ m/z 200) at a target AGC value of 5e4 ions. A 20 s dynamic exclusion was employed.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Optimized LC-MS/MS analysis of enriched peptides

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PDQ-enriched peptides were reconstituted in 15 μL of 97/2/1 (v/v/v/) H2O/MeCN/TFA, and 4.5 μL was analyzed in duplicate by LC-MS/MS. Unbound fractions were reconstituted in the same buffer at ~1 μg/μL, and 1.5–2.5 μL was analyzed. LC-MS/MS used a Waters M-Class interfaced to a Thermo Fusion Lumos via a NanoSpray Flex source and CoAnn emitter 20 μm ID, 10 μm Tip ID, 6.35 cm length)). Peptides were trapped on a Symmetry C18 180 μm × 20 mm trapping column (Waters) at 5 μL/min with 99.9/0.1 v/v H2O/MeCN and separated on a 75 μm × 25 cm HSS-T3 analytical column (Waters) at 400 nl/min and 55 °C and a gradient of 5–30% MeCN over 90 min. MS acquisition used a 3 s vendor-supplied synchronous precursor selection (TMTPro-SPS-MS3) template method. Briefly, Precursor scans used 120,000 resolution, standard AGC target and auto maximum injection time (IT). Precursors (scan range 400–1600 m/z, charge state 2–6, intensity threshold 5E3) were selected for collision-induced dissociation using 0.7 m/z, “Turbo” ion trap scan with 25 ms max IT. Finally 10 SPS precursors were subjected to higher-energy collision-induced dissociation with 0.7 m/z isolation, normalized collision energy of 55%, 50,000 resolution, 200% AGC and 200 ms max IT. Analysis of unbound fractions also used a FAIMS-Pro interface with a 3 CV method (−40 CV for 1.2 s, −55 CV for 1.2 s, −70 CV for 0.8 s).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!