The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Ge lightspeed 16 slice ct scanner

Manufactured by GE Healthcare
Sourced in United States

The GE LightSpeed 16-slice CT Scanner is a diagnostic imaging device that utilizes X-ray technology to capture multiple cross-sectional images of the body. It is capable of capturing 16 slices of the body simultaneously, enabling rapid data acquisition for efficient patient scanning.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

7 protocols using ge lightspeed 16 slice ct scanner

1

Chest CT Imaging Protocol for Lung Evaluation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The GE LightSpeed 16-slice CT Scanner [GE Healthcare Co., Ltd., (Chicago, IL)] and the Toshiba Aquilion One Vision 320-detecor row CT scanner (Toshiba Medical Systems, Otawara-shi, Japan) were used for the chest CT examinations in this study. Chest CT was performed with the patient in a supine position and holding their breath after inhalation, and the scan was from the apex of the lung to the top of the diaphragm. The scanning parameters were 120 kV tube voltage, 210–230 mA tube current, 5 mm slice thickness, 512 × 512 matrix, 2 mm slice intervals, and 1.25 mm reconstructed slice thickness. A mediastinal window (window width of 300–400 HU, window level of 40–50 HU) and lung window (window width of 1,100–1,300 HU, window level of − 800 HU) were selected for observations in the picture archiving and communication system (PACS) workstation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Assessing Intervertebral Disc Height and Fusion

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Lateral radiography was done immediately after the surgical implantation and before sacrifice to determine any gas accumulation, disc space height (DSH) and implant subsidence. The change of DSH (ΔDSH) was calculated as the difference between height A and height B, where the distance from the upper front edge of vertebral body fixed by the upper screw of titanium plate to the lower front edge of vertebral body fixed by the inferior screw of titanium plate was height B (Figure 3) which was measured during follow up period, and height A was measured immediately after operation; positive ΔDSH value suggested the decreased postoperative vertebral body height.
A high-resolution CT was conducted before sacrifice at each time point to evaluate the interbody fusion. With a sagittal reconstruction of the CT images, the interbody fusion was evaluated based on a scoring system reported by Goldschlager et al.: 0, no new bone formation; 1, new bone formation but not continuous between C2–3 and C4–5; 2, continuous bridging new bone but fusion area <30%; 3, continuous bridging new bone but fusion area >30% (18 (link)). CT was performed using a GE LightSpeed16 Slice CT Scanner (GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, WI, USA) with 0.63-mm slice thickness and 0.63-mm interval.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Lung CT Scanning Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Lung CT was performed with GE lightspeed 16-slice CT scanner (GE Healthcare Texas). Scanning range: from the upper edge of cervical vertebra 7 to lumbar vertebra 2. Scanning parameters: rotating speed of ball tube 0.625 s/rot, pitch 1, tube voltage 100–120kv, adaptive tube current technology (110mAs–140mAs), reconstruction parameters: layer thickness 1.25 mm, layer spacing 1.25 mm, window width-550hu, window position 1500hu reconstruction, even density projection.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Temporal Bone Defect Evaluation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The animals were anesthetized and placed in ventral recumbancy on the GE LightSpeed 16 Slice CT scanner (GE Medical Systems). The scans (0.625 mm resolution, 120 kV) were conducted on all animals at 2 months pre-surgery, immediately, and at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months following surgery. μCT imaging (50 μm resolution, 100 kV) of harvested RCUs was done using the GE Explore CT-120 (GE Medical Systems) at an external facility (Cornell University Imaging Facility), in a blinded fashion. Condyle height and bone volume were measured using the Mimics software (Materialise). Quantitation of bone volume and bone volume fraction was conducted by determining the amount of bone in the defect area based on the difference between the CT of pre- and post- surgery and the amount of bone removed.
μCT was performed by using a modified protocol (47 (link)), and the samples were scanned at 21-μm isotropic resolution. The bone volume was obtained from the application of a global thresholding technique so that only the mineralized tissue was detected. There was no difficulty in distinguishing the grafted material from the miniplates and screws used for fixation, which appeared in μCT as compact and geometrically defined structures. Spatial resolution of the full-voxel model was sufficient for evaluating the microarchitecture of the bone tissue.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Prostate Cancer Immobilization and Imaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All patients were immobilized using the Body Pro‐LokTM platform (CIVCO system, Orange City, IA) in the supine position with their arms up. A Knee cushion was used to immobilize the knees. Patients were instructed to present for CT simulation and treatment with a comfortably full bladder and empty rectum. To ensure a relatively empty rectum, patients were instructed to use metamucil beginning 3‐day prior to simulation and daily throughout the course of treatment. A free‐breathing planning 3D‐CT scan was acquired on a GE Lightspeed 16 slice CT scanner (General Electric Medical Systems, Waukesha, WI) with 512 × 512 pixels at 2.5‐mm slice thickness in the axial helical mode. The planning 3D‐CT images were imported into Eclipse treatment planning system (TPS, Version 15.6, Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA) for contouring the entire prostate capsule as a clinical target volume (CTV) and the OAR. The planning target volume (PTV) was generated by adding a 3 mm symmetric margin around the prostate capsule per RTOG‐0938 recommendation.12 The average PTV size was 117.0 ± 34.0 cc (range, 73.0 to 186.0 cc), corresponding to an average PTV diameter of 6.0 ± 0.6 cm (range, 5.2 to 7.1 cm). OAR contours included rectum, bladder, penile bulb, femoral heads, skin, and urethra per RTOG‐0938 requirement. In addition, small bowel and sigmoid were also contoured for dose reporting.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Radiographic Evaluation of Interbody Fusion

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Lateral radiographs were performed after implantation and before sacrifice to determine whether any gas accumulation or intervertebral space subsidence occurred. The disc space height (DSH) was defined as the average of the measured height of the anterior, midpoint, and posterior disc space (Figure 1(c)). A high-resolution CT scan was conducted at the end of the observation period to evaluate the interbody fusion. With a sagittal reconstruction of the CT images, the interbody fusion could be evaluated based on a scoring system reported by Goldschlager et al. [22 (link)]. The criteria for CT scoring were as follows: 0, no new bone formation; 1, new bone formation but not continuous between C2/3 and C4/5; 2, continuous bridging new bone but comprises <30% of fusion area; and 3, continuous bridging new bone but comprises >30% of fusion area.
All the CT scans were performed using a GE LightSpeed 16 Slice CT Scanner (GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, WI, USA) with the 0.63 mm slice thickness and 0.63 mm interval.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Chest CT Imaging Standardization Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In this study, all the patients underwent a non-contrast CT of the chest by the performance of a Siemens SOMATOM Sensation 64-Slice CT Scanner (Siemens, Forchheim, Germany) or a GE LightSpeed 16-Slice CT scanner (GE Healthcare, Beijing, China). CT related parameters were as follows: routine section thickness1.0, 1.25, or 1.5 mm; section thickness after reconstruction: 0.625–1.25 mm; filtered back-projection reconstruction method; 80–120 kV; 200–280 mAs; and a B70f kernel. The data of these 677 patient’s chest CT were procured from picture archiving and communication system (PACS).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!