The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

21 protocols using bioworks 3

1

Peptide Purification and Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
UV-Vis spectra were recorded on an Agilent (Santa Clara, CA, USA) 8453 diode array spectrophotometer equipped with a magnetically stirred quartz optical cell of 1 cm path length. Peptide purification was performed on a Shimadzu HPLC instrument equipped with two LC-20AD pumps and an SPDM20A diode array detector (working range: 190–800 nm) using a Phenomenex Jupiter 4U Proteo semipreparative column (4 μm, 250 × 10 mm). Mass spectrometry analysis was performed on an LCQ ADV MAX ion-trap mass spectrometer with an ESI ion source. The ESI conditions were as follows: capillary temperature 210 °C, tube lens voltage −25 V, and source voltage +4.9 kV. The system was run in automated LC-MS/MS mode, using a surveyor HPLC system (Thermo Finnigan, San Jose, CA, USA) equipped with a Phenomenex Jupiter 4U Proteo column (4 μm, 150 × 2.0 mm). For the analysis of peptide fragments, Bioworks 3.1 and Xcalibur 2.0.7 SP1 software were used (Thermo Finnigan, San Jose, CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Characterization of Tau Peptide Modifications

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All reagents for the peptide synthesis, including protected amino acids and rink amide resin, were purchased from Novabiochem, while other chemical compounds were reagent grade from Sigma-Aldrich. Purification of tau peptides was performed on a Shimadzu HPLC instrument equipped with two LC-20AD pumps and a SPD-M20A diode array detector, using a Phenomenex Jupiter 4µ Proteo semipreparative column (4 μm, 250 × 10 mm). Mass analysis and LC-MS/MS chromatograms were acquired with a LCQ ADV MAX ion-trap mass spectrometer, with an ESI ion source. The instrument works in automated LC-MS/MS mode through a surveyor HPLC system (Thermo Finnigan, San Jose, CA, USA) equipped with a Phenomenex Jupiter 4µ Proteo column (4 µm, 150 × 2.0 mm). In order to identify the oxidative modifications of peptide fragments, Bioworks 3.1 and Xcalibur 2.0.7 SP1 software were used (Thermo Finnigan, San Jose, CA, USA). UV-visible absorption spectra were collected with a Thermo Evolution 260 Bio spectrophotometer, provided with a Peltier thermostat. Circular dichroism spectra were acquired with a Jasco J715 spectropolarimeter, equipped with a Peltier thermostat. UV-visible kinetic profiles were obtained through an Agilent 8453 diode array spectrophotometer, equipped with a thermostated, magnetically stirred optical cell.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

SILAC-based AURKA-Flag Interactome

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells stably expressing AURKA-Flag were cultured in SILAC labelling medium containing 107 mg l−1 D3-leucine (heavy). The control cells (expressing Flag) were cultured in SILAC labelling medium containing 105 mg l−1 D0-leucine (light). After eight passages, cells were lysed in RIPA. A 1:1 ratio of proteins from heavy and light labelled cells was combined and immunoprecipitated by using anti-Flag M2 agarose beads. The beads were washed in RIPA and eluted with buffer containing 200 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 0.2 mg ml−1 Flag peptide (Sigma). The eluted proteins were separated via SDS–PAGE and in-gel trypsin digestion was performed. Liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry was performed on a LTQ-Orbitrap instrument (Thermo Electron Corporation). The data were analysed using the IPI databases for human version 3.35 with BioWorks 3.2 software (Thermo Electron Corporation). The peptide/protein ratios were calculated using the SILAC function module of the BioWorks software package with the following settings: target residue at leucine, mass at 3.0188, mass tolerance at 0.01 Da, minimum threshold at 10, no smoothing and run the calculation based on area.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Flag-tagged Aurora A Interactome

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell lysates from HCT-8 cells stably expressing either Flag or Aurora A-Flag were immunoprecipitated by using anti-Flag M2 agarose beads (Sigma), and separated via SDS-PAGE. Liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry was performed on a LTQ-Orbitrap instrument (Thermo Electron Corporation). The data were analyzed using the IPI databases for human version 3.35 with BioWorks 3.2 software (Thermo Electron Corporation).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Proteomic Analysis of White-tailed Deer

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mass spectra were searched against a protein database using the SEQUEST [25 (link)] algorithm in Bioworks 3.3 (Thermo Fisher Scientific). At the time of analysis, the C. virginianus known proteome contained fewer than 100 proteins so the reference proteome (RefSeq) for Gallus gallus containing 18,768 entries was downloaded from NCBI on September 29, 2009. The protein database was in silico trypsin digested and cysteine carbamidomethylation and methionine oxidations (single and double) were included in the search criteria. Precursor and fragment ion tolerances were set at 1.5 Daltons. A randomized decoy database was also searched with mass spectra using the same search criteria as described above to estimate the probability of peptide identifications being false positives. We used a peptide probability filter of p ≤ 0.05 for protein identifications. Identified proteins were evaluated for differential expression using Monte Carlo re-sampling statistics [26 (link)] at a p-value of ≤ 0.05. The mass spectrometry proteomics data have been deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium (http://proteomecentral.proteomexchange.org) via the PRIDE partner repository with the dataset identifier PXD001206.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Mass Spectrometry Analysis of Xenopus Dvl2

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Embryos were microinjected with mRNAs encoding Xenopus V5-tagged Dvl2 lacking the DIX domain, and 600 embryos per group were harvested, followed by IP. Gel running was conducted using a 4–12% Bis-Tris gradient gel (NP0321PK2; Thermo Fisher Scientific). After staining with SimplyBlue SafeStain (LC6060; Invitrogen), gel bands were excised and digested with trypsin. Digested peptides were analyzed by an Easy-nLC 1000 instrument with a LTQ Velos Pro mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific), as previously described (Ding et al., 2017 (link)). Acquired tandem mass spectrometry spectra UniProt Xenopus protein database with SEQUEST interfaced with BioWorks 3.3 (Thermo Fisher Scientific) was used to identify the acquired tandem mass spectrometry spectra.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Proteomic Analysis of S. pyogenes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunoprecipitated antigens were separated on 7% TA gels and subjected to in gel trypsin digest and subsequent liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry as previously described31 (link). Proteins were identified using a publically available proteome for serotype M1 S. pyogenes (Uniprot, CP000017)32 33 (link); and correlation of the MS/MS peptide data with the in silico trypsin fragmentation patterns predicted using BioWorks 3.3 and the SEQUEST algorithm (Thermo Scientific). Peptides generating ions of 200–2000 amu, with a cross correlation score >1.5, 2.0, or 2.5 (where z = 1, 2 or 3 respectively) and a p < 0.01 were mapped onto the S. pyogenes proteome. Proteins that contained two or more of the identified peptides were selected for further analysis. The protein probability for each selected protein was calculated using the SEQUEST algorithm and reported as a range of up to 20 values derived independently from analysis of proteins from each of the strains examined.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Protein Identification via SEQUEST Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For protein identification, MSn data were searched against translated genomic database (Eichinger et al., 2005 (link); curated at dictybase.org) using SEQUEST (Bioworks 3.3, Thermo Fisher Scientific) with the following settings: 1000 ppm (10 ppm for data acquired using LTQ Orbitrap XL™) tolerance was set for precursor masses and 0.5 Da for fragment masses; trypsin was specified as the enzyme and only fully tryptic peptide identifications were retained; a maximum of three missed cleavage sites, three differential amino acids per modification, and three differential modifications per peptide were allowed; oxidization of methionine (+15.99 Da), carboxyamidomethylation of cysteine (+57.02 Da), phosphorylation of serine/threonine/tyrosine (+79.97 Da), and O-GlcNAc modification of serine/threonine (+203.08 Da) were set as differential modifications. All the raw spectra were searched against both normal (forward) and reverse databases under the same parameters. Peptides were filtered to 1% false-discovery rate and protein assignments were required to have a minimum of two independent peptides.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Protein Quantification by MS/MS Spectral Counting

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Acquired MS/MS spectra were searched against an international protein index “rat v. 3.78 FASTA-format decoy database” downloaded from European Bioinformatics Institute (EBI, http://www.ebi.ac.uk/). The SEQUEST algorithm [19 (link)] was used to find the best matching sequences from the database with BioWorks 3.3 (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Rockford, IL, USA) for fully tryptic peptides. The mass of the amino acid cysteine was statically modified by +57 Da and the differential modification search was performed for oxidation (+16 Da on Met). Xcorr values were based on tryptic peptides and charge states following 1.8 for singly charged peptides, 2.5 for doubly charged peptides, 3.5 for triply charged peptides, and 0.08 for ΔCn (DTASelect v. 2.0.39). The analysis of protein fold-change was quantified by an overall spectral counting method comparison of label-free methods for quantifying human proteins [20 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Mass Spectrometry-based Protein Identification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MS/MS spectra were searched against E. coli using Sequest (version 27, rev 12), which is part of the BioWorks 3.3 data analysis package (Thermo Fisher, San Jose, CA). MS/MS spectra were searched with a maximum allowed deviation of 10 ppm for the precursor mass and 1 amu for fragment masses. Methionine oxidation and cysteine carboxamidomethylation were allowed as variable modifications, two missed cleavages were allowed and the minimum number of tryptic termini was 1. After the database search, the DTA and OUT files were imported into Scaffold (versions 1.07 and 2.01) (Proteomesoftware, Portland, OR). Scaffold was used to organize the data and to validate peptide identifications using the Peptide Prophet algorithm and only identifications with a probability >95% were retained. Subsequently, the Protein-Prophet algorithm was applied and protein identifications with a probability of >99% with 2 peptides in at least one of the samples were retained. Proteins that contained similar peptides and could not be differentiated based on MS/MS analysis alone were grouped. For each protein identified, the number of spectral counts (the number of MS/MS associated with an identified protein) is listed in Supplemental Table S5.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!