The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Spss 17.0 statistical software for windows

Manufactured by IBM
Sourced in United States

SPSS 17.0 is a statistical software package designed for Windows operating systems. It provides users with a comprehensive set of tools for data analysis, including descriptive statistics, regression analysis, and hypothesis testing. The software is used by researchers, analysts, and decision-makers across various industries to gain insights from their data.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

Lab products found in correlation

9 protocols using spss 17.0 statistical software for windows

1

Mortality Risk Factors Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Results are presented as mean and standard deviation or median, according to normality characteristics for each variable. Student's t-test was used to compare parametric variables between two groups and the Mann-Whitney test was used for non-parametric variables. Categorical variables were expressed as proportions and compared with the chi-square or Fisher's exact test. Variables with significant univariate associations were considered as candidates for multivariable analysis. Longitudinal multivariable logistic regression was performed using backward variable selection, with the exit criteria set at p < 0.25. Variables not selected by the automated procedure were added back into the models individually to evaluate residual confounding and covariance, and we tested for colinearity among all variables using univariate analysis to identify possible associated confounding variables. Subsequently, through the construction of a logistic regression model, multivariate analysis was performed with odds ratio (OR) calculations, including all independent variables that showed association with the mortality, with p ≤ 0.20.
All statistical analyses were performed on an intention-to-treat basis using SPSS 17.0 for Windows statistical software (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA), with a two-sided p < 0.05 considered to be statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Cataract Surgery Outcomes in Diabetes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All the data were analyzed using SPSS 17.0 for Windows statistical software (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) and are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (SD). The Mann–Whitney U test was used to evaluate the differences between the two groups. The preoperative and postoperative measurements were compared using the repeated measures analysis of variance tests with Bonferroni corrections. Pearson's correlation analyses were performed to determine the relationships between the magnitude of change in MT, SCP, and DCP from baseline and related factors, including the duration of DM, HbA1C, SBP, DBP, TC, and CDE and bottle height during cataract surgery. The correlations between BCVA and MT, SCP, DCP, and FAZ were analyzed by Spearman's correlation. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant [12 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Balloon Patency and Clinical Outcomes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analyses were performed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) 17.0 statistical software for Windows (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL, USA). Kaplan Meier life table analysis was used for calculate patency of balloons. The information on patients and fistulas were retrospectively reviewed. The data are presented as mean standard deviation or the percentage. The outcomes including clinical success rates were determined by frequency.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Limb Preservation in Charcot Neuroarthropathy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analyses were performed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) 17.0 statistical software for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Comparisons between patients with and without Charcot neuroarthropathy were performed using the t-test for continuous variables and the χ2 test for discrete variables. Kaplan-Meier life table analysis was used to calculate limb preservation of the two groups. The log-rank test was used to compare the limb preservation rates of the groups with CN and without CN and to determine statistically significant levels. p values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Validity and Reliability of DASI Questionnaire

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Descriptive statistics were calculated for sample characterization, considering all variables assessed. To investigate concurrent validity, the mean difference (MD) between face to face and telephone-based administration was calculated (95% confidence interval [95% CI]). The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC2,1), used to measure the reliability of ratings in studies, was employed to verify the agreement between the total score of the DASI questionnaire applied face-to-face and by telephone. The magnitude of the ICC was interpreted as: very high (ICC ≥0.90), high (0.70 ≤ ICC ≤0.89), moderate (0.50 ≤ ICC ≤0, 69), low (0.26 ≤ ICC ≤0.49), and very low (ICC ≤0.25) [17 (link)]. The κ-weighted statistic was used to investigate agreement between individual DASI items. Kappa coefficients were interpreted as: perfect (1.00), almost perfect (>0.80), substantial (0.61–0.80), moderate (0.21–0.60), and slight (≤0.20) [29 (link)]. All analyzes were performed using SPSS 17.0 statistical software for Windows, with a significance level of 5%.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Evaluation of Protein Expression Changes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 17.0 statistical software for windows (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL USA). All P-values were two-sided, and P<0.05 was used to indicate a statistically significant difference. The data of protein expression derived from the ELISA experiment at baseline and following treatment were statistically compared using a paired samples t-test.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Bronchoscopic Findings in TBM/EDAC

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Quantitative variables were expressed as the mean and standard deviation, and categorical variables were expressed as percentages. The association between bronchoscopic finding of TBM/EDAC and the other variables was calculated using Chi-square test. Data were considered statistically significant at P < 0.05. The statistical analysis was performed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) 17.0 statistical software for Windows (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Exploring Non-Parametric Data Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Due to the small sample size, the data were assumed to be non-parametric with relevant analyses undertaken. Continuous data are presented as median and range, while categorical variables are presented as frequencies.
The level of statistical significance was set for p values of less than 0.05. SPSS 17.0 statistical software for windows was used for the statistical analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Charcot Neuro-Arthropathy Statistical Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analyses were performed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) 17.0 statistical software for Windows (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL, USA). Comparisons between patients with and without Charcot neuro-arthropathy were performed using Student's t-test for continuous variables and the χ2 test for discrete variables. P values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!