The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Mutation surveyor software

Manufactured by SoftGenetics
Sourced in United States

Mutation Surveyor software is a bioinformatics tool designed for the analysis and detection of genetic mutations. It provides a streamlined interface for processing and interpreting DNA sequence data.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

101 protocols using mutation surveyor software

1

Validation of RECQL Variants by Sanger Sequencing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

Example 8

All deleterious RECQL variants identified by whole exome sequencing in the discovery phase were confirmed by Sanger direct sequencing. The entire coding regions of RECQL (NM_002907.3) were sequenced in 13 amplicons in the validation phase. Sanger sequencing was also used for genotyping the RECQL p.Arg215Ter mutation located in exon 6. Sequencing reactions were performed using a BigDye® Terminator v3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit (Applied Biosystems/Life Technologies, Foster City, Calif., USA) according to the manufacturer's protocol.

Sequencing products were analyzed on the ABI PRISM® 3500XL Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems/Life Technologies, Foster City, Calif., USA). All sequences were compared to the RECQL RefSeq sequence (NM_002907.3) for variant detection using Mutation Surveyor software (SoftGenetics LLC, State College, Pa., USA).

+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

DNA Amplification and Sequencing Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was used to amplify the DNA sequences in a 20 μl final reaction volume, using Phusion High-Fidelity DNA Polymerase (catalogue number: F5305). Final concentration of the forward and reverse primer was 10 pmol. The reactions were carried out in a SimpliAmp Thermal Cycler (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The following thermal cycler conditions were used: initial denaturation of 98°C for 30 seconds; followed by 35 cycles of 98°C for 30 seconds, 65°C for 30 seconds, and 72°C for 30 seconds; and a final extension of 72°C for 5 minutes. The PCR products (5 μl) plus 1 μl of loading dye were ran on gel.
After amplification using PCR, Sanger sequencing was performed as per the manufacturer's instructions (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The following primers were used: forward primer—5′-GTGATGGGCTGTTTAAAGTGTCAC-3′ (1.0 μM) and reverse primer—5′-ATTGAAAGAGACCTGGAAGGAGGG-3′ (1.0 μM). The obtained sequencing data were compared to the reference sequences (Hg37) with the aid of the Mutation Surveyor Software (SoftGenetics).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

EGFR Gene Exons Amplification and Sequencing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Exons 18, 19, 20, and 21 of the EGFR gene were amplified with minor modification; namely, nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was only performed on specimens when their first PCR products could not be visualized on 2% agarose gel electrophoresis. The first round of PCR was performed in a total volume of 25 μL containing 2 μL of DNA, 1× Taq Master Mix Red (Ampliqon III, Odense, Denmark), and 0.5 μM of each primer. This PCR program consisted of 35 cycles of (95°C for 40 s, 56°C for 40 s, and 72°C for 40 s), followed by a 5-minute extension stage at 72°C. For the nested PCR protocol, DNA amplification was performed using the same PCR program as described above, using 2 μL of the first PCR products as a template, 1× Taq Master Mix Red, and 0.5 μM of each primer. Sanger sequencing was performed with forward or reverse primers, and sequence analyses were performed using Mutation Surveyor software (SoftGenetics, State College, PA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Genetic Variant Analysis in Cardiac Tissue Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The peripheral venous blood samples from 113 patients were prepared for DNA extraction using the Blood Extraction Kit (QIAGEN, Germany). The cardiac tissue samples from 95 patients were prepared for cDNA extraction. All of the regions covered by TES and all primers for smyd4 exon sequencing in cDNA are listed in S5 Table. Variant analysis was performed using the Mutation Surveyor software (Softgenetics, USA). All variants were screened in public databases, including the 1000 Genome database, the dbSNP database, and the ExAC database, and an internal database in the molecular diagnosis laboratory at the Children’s Hospital of Fudan University. A risk analysis of SNVs was performed using SIFT, Polyphen2, and Mutation Taster to predict the possible effects on protein function. A 3D structure analysis of the wild-type and mutant proteins was performed on the SWISS MODEL website (https://www.swissmodel.expasy.org/).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

GT Dinucleotide Length Polymorphism in COL1A2

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To determine length polymorphism of dinucleotide GTn of intron 1 COL1A2 gene, the raw sequencing data were submitted to Mutation Surveyor software version 5.0.1 (www.softgenetics.com). This program can directly compare chromatograms with genomic DNA of reference sequence of COL1A2 (NT_007933_94023373). Alignment of the sequences was carried out using BioEdit software version 8.0.5 and ClustalW algorithm (Thompson et al., 1994 (link)). Sequences obtained (Hall, 1999 ) were thoroughly checked, cleaned, and aligned to identify homologies among sites, and also to perform other phylogenetic analysis including the determination of variability index and genetic diversity as well as the parameters of genetic differentiation. Genetic variability parameters (number of polymorphic sites, total number of haplotype, average number of nucleotide difference K) were obtained through DnaSP 5.10 software (Librado and Rozas, 2009 (link)) and MEGA 7.0.26 (Kumar et al., 2016 (link)). To estimate genetic variation according to epidemiological parameters, the factor of genetic differentiation (Fst) and the analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) were determined with Arlequin software version 3.5.1.3 (Excoffier and Lischer, 2010 (link)). Values of P less than 0.05 are considered significant at a 5% confidence interval.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Variant Confirmation by Sanger Sequencing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Each variant identified by WES in the discovery phase and selected for validation was confirmed by Sanger direct sequencing. Sequencing reactions were performed using the BigDye Terminator v3.1 Cycle Sequencing kit (Life Technologies, Foster City, CA). according to the manufacturer's protocol. Sequencing products were analyzed on the ABI Prism 3500XL Genetic Analyzer (Life Technologies). All sequences were compared reference sequences for variant detection using Mutation Surveyor software (SoftGenetics).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Genetic Profiling of OPN1LW and OPN1MW

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The basic structure of OPN1LW and OPN1MW gene cluster was captured and amplified by PCR, then screened with Sanger sequencing as previously described17 (link),18 (link). Briefly, OPN1LW and OPN1MW ’s exons were captured using specifically designed primers as first step (Tables S2 and S3), then amplified for Sanger sequencing using Step 2 primers shown in Table S3. The data were analyzed by using Mutation Surveyor software (SoftGenetics, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Genetic Analysis of ARR3 Gene in High Myopia

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genomic DNA from all the available members in the family and 150 unrelated female sporadic Chinese cases with high myopia were isolated from peripheral blood using RelaxGene Blood Kit (TIANGEN, Beijing, China), following the manufacturer’s instructions. The exons and exon–intron boundaries sequence of ARR3 gene were downloaded from Ensembl Genome Browser. The primers were designed using the Primer-BLAST (Table S1). All the coding and splice site regions of ARR3 gene were sequenced for all individuals. The data were analyzed by using Mutation Surveyor software (SoftGenetics, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Genetic Profiling for Hereditary Hearing Loss

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For the discovery phase, genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral blood of the NL family using a modified salting out protocol (Miller et al. 1988 (link)) and screening was performed by bi-directional Sanger sequencing and analyzed using Mutation Surveyor Software (v5.0, SoftGenetics LLC State College, PA, USA). The NL proband was Sanger sequenced for all pathogenic variants causing hearing loss in this genetically isolated population, followed by select autosomal dominant genes matching the proband’s (PID IV-7) audiometric data with that of reference audioprofiles of 34 autosomal dominant deafness loci (Audiogene v4.0) (Hildebrand et al. 2009 (link)).
We next performed genome-wide single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotyping using the Illumina 610Quad genotyping chip (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) on multiple family members. Starting with a set of > 500,000 high quality SNP markers, informative SNPs (n = 17,407) were imported into Superlink (v1.7) (Fishelson and Geiger 2004 (link)) and linkage analysis performed under an autosomal dominant model with 99% penetrance and a disease allele frequency of 0.0025.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

KRAS G12/13 Mutation Identification in PDO Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA was extracted from snap-frozen human PDO cell pellets by the Sample Processing Lab using an AllPrep kit (Qiagen). Primers sequences for amplification and sequencing of exons of the KRAS gene that contain the G12/13 codons are listed below:
KRAS G12/13 forward: 5′-CTGGTGGAGTATTTGATAGTG-3′
KRAS G12/13 reverse: 5′-CTGTATCAAAGAATGGTCCTG-3′.
The following PCR conditions were used as previously described54 (link) and specifically noted in that paper: ‘94 °C for 2 min; three cycles of 94 °C for 30 s, 64 °C for 30 s and 72 °C for 30 s; three cycles of 94 °C for 30 s, 61 °C for 30 s and 72 °C for 30 s; three cycles of 94 °C for 30 s, 58 °C for 30 s and 72 °C for 30 s and three cycles of 94 °C for 30 s, 57 °C for 30 s and 72 °C for 30 s, followed by 72 °C for 5 min and a hold at 4 °C’. PCR products were purified using a QIAquick PCR purification kit and sent to and sequenced by Eurofins. The resulting sequences were analyzed using Mutation Surveyor software (SoftGenetics).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!