The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Cell disrupter

Manufactured by Constant Systems
Sourced in United Kingdom

A cell disrupter is a laboratory instrument used to break open or disrupt cells in order to extract their contents, such as proteins, nucleic acids, or other cellular components. It operates by applying physical force to the cells, typically through mechanical, sonic, or chemical means, to disrupt the cell membrane and release the desired intracellular materials.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

22 protocols using cell disrupter

1

Purification of pfTrmBL2 Protein

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For the purification of pfTrmBL2, 10-g cells were resuspended in 50 ml lysis buffer containing 40 mM Hepes (pH 7.5), 1 M NaCl, 20 mM imidazole, 20% glycerol, one-third protease inhibitor tablet (Roche) and 10 μg/ml of DNase (Roche) and were incubated at room temperature for 30 min. The cell lysis was carried out by a cell disrupter (Constant Systems Limited, UK) and the lysate was centrifuged at 185,500g for 60 min.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Purification of BOS Protein from E. coli

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
BOS was expressed in BL21 (DE3), using the pET28-bdSUMO expression vector. A 5-L culture was induced with 200 μM IPTG and grown O/N at 15 °C. The cells were harvested and lysed by a cell disrupter (Constant Systems©) in lysis buffer (50 mM Tris, pH 7.5, 0.1 M NaCl, 1 mM DTT, 2 mM MgCl2, 8% glycerol) containing 200 KU/100 ml lysozyme, 20 μg/ml DNase, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF), and protease inhibitor cocktail. Following centrifugation, 1% Triton was added to the supernatant and the lysate was incubated with Ni-beads (Adar Biotech©) for 1 h at 4 °C. The beads were washed four times with 50 ml of lysis buffer after which the enzyme was eluted by incubation with 5 ml of lysis buffer containing 0.4 mg of bdSUMO protease for 2 h at RT. The eluate, containing untagged BOS, was concentrated and applied to a size exclusion column (HiLoad 16/60 Superdex75 prep-grade, GE Healthcare©) equilibrated with 50 mM Tris pH 7.5, 0.1 M NaCl, 2 mM MgCl2, and 8% glycerol. Purified BOS was eluted as a single peak at 58 ml and pooled, concentrated to 28 mg/ml, and frozen in aliquots at −80 °C.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Purification of AcrB Transporter Protein

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The protein was expressed using auto-induction and membrane preparation, styrene maleic acid (SMA) solubilisation and protein purification were performed using the protocols previously reported [36 (link),37 (link)]. Cells were disrupted with a cell disrupter (Constant Systems Ltd.) at 30 kpsi after resuspension in 20 mM Tris, 0.5mM EDTA pH 7.9 (4 °C) in a ratio of 4:1 buffer to pellet. The cell membranes were isolated by differential centrifugation as previously described [38 (link)]. AcrB was extracted in its native trimeric form (~340kDa) using 2.5% (w/v) SMA, incubated for 2 h at room temperature as previously described [36 (link),39 (link)]. The insoluble material was removed by centrifugation (100,000× g, 1 h, 4 °C). The supernatant was mixed with 2 mL HisPur™ Cobalt Resin (Thermo scientific) and incubated in batch overnight at 4 °C with gentle agitation. Following packing, the resin was washed twice with wash buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, 500 mM NaCl, 10% (w/v) glycerol). After elution (50 mM Tris-HCl, 500 mM NaCl, 10% (w/v) glycerol, 300 mM imidazole), the peak fractions were pooled out and dialysed against a buffer free of imidazole.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Membrane Protein Extraction and Purification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The cells were harvested using a Beckman centrifuge equipped with the JLA 8.1000 rotor at 7,500 rpm (~10,000 × g) for 30 min. The cells were homogenized in 4 ml cell lysis buffer (100 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 5 mM MgSO4, some crystals phenylmethanesulfonyl fluoride, some crystals DNaseI (Roche)) per 1 g of cells (wet weight), and passed through a cell disrupter 4 times at 40 kPsi (Constant Systems). Cell debris was collected by centrifugation at 27,000 × g for 20 min. (Type 45Ti rotor, Beckman) and subsequently the membranes were collected by ultracentrifugation at 150,000 × g for 90 min (Type 45Ti rotor, Beckman).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Recombinant Protein Expression and Purification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
hMLC was cloned into the His-bsSumo (K151) expression vector using Transfer-PCR. An Ala residue was incorporated at the N-terminal part of hMLC in order to facilitate cleavage of hMLC from the His-bdSumo tag. Expression was performed in E coli Bl21(DE3) cells. Protein production was induced by addition of 0.2 mM IPTG at mid-log phase and the cells were grown overnight at 15 °C. Cells were lysed using a cell disrupter (Constant Systems) at 4 °C in buffer A (50 mM Tris pH 8, 0.5 M NaCl, 20 mM Imidazole with EDTA-free protease-inhibitor tablet, 0.5 mg/ml lysozyme, and DNaseI). After centrifugation, the clarified supernatant was passed over a HiTrap chelating HP 5 ml column (GE, Healthecare). 1 ml bdSumo protease, bdSENP1, without His tag was added to the column which was left at 4 °C overnight. The cleaved protein was collected by washing the column with 10 ml buffer A. hMLC was further purified by size-exclusion chromatography (HiLoad_16/60_superdex75 prepgrade, GE Healthcare) equilibrated with 50 mM Tris pH 8, 0.1 M NaCl.
DAPK2 K42A and K42A S289A were cloned into the pET28-TevH expression vector using Transfer-PCR. Plasmids were expressed in Escherichia coli BL21(DE3) cells. Proteins were purified using excess peptide.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

HI18 Protein Expression and Purification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HI18 was selected from a β-wrapin phage display library as described17 (link). Protein expression was carried out using a pET302/NT-His vector encoding HI18 with an N-terminal His6-tag in E. coli BL21(DE3) cells in LB medium. Expression was induced with 1 mM IPTG at OD 0.6–0.8 followed by overnight incubation at 27 °C. The cell pellet was resuspended in 20 mM imidazole, 500 mM NaCl, 20 mM sodium phosphate, pH 8.0, containing EDTA-free protease inhibitors (Roche Applied Sciences) and lysed by a cell disrupter (Constant Systems). Insoluble material was removed by centrifugation at 28,000 × g and the supernatant was loaded on a HisTrap FF 5 ml column (GE Healthcare). The dimeric form of HI18 was collected from a HiLoad 16/60 Superdex 75 size-exclusion chromatography column (GE Healthcare) in 20 mM sodium phosphate, pH 6.0. For NMR experiments, HI18 was expressed in M9 minimal medium supplemented with 15N-NH4Cl (1 g/l) and 13C6-glucose (2 g/l) and purified as above.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Membrane Preparation and Protein Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Membranes were prepared by resuspending cells in 0.4 M sorbitol, 50 mM KH2PO4, pH 7.4, 5 mM EDTA, and 1 mM phenylmethanesulfonyl fluoride. Cell suspensions were crushed twice using a cell disrupter (Constant systems, at 38 kpsi). The cell debris was removed by centrifugation at 5,500 × g (12 min, 4 °C) and membranes were collected at 120,000 × g, Type 45 Ti rotor (Beckman Coulter) for 1 h at 4°C. Membrane pellets were homogenized in 50 mM KH2PO4, pH 8.0, and the protein concentration was determined using a modified Lowry assay, which contained 1% SDS in the membrane and reference samples (78 (link)). The samples were rapidly frozen in liquid N2 and stored at –80 °C.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Antibody Production for ADO Protein

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In order to produce a specific antibody against ADO, the ado gene (sll0208) with additional 6x His-tag at the N-terminal end was amplified from genomic DNA and subcloned into a commercial pACYC plasmid (Novagen). The pACYC-sll0208 construct was confirmed by sequencing (MWG) and used for protein over-expression in E. coli BL21. Protein production was induced with 0.5mM isopropyl-β-d-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG), and after ~16h, the cells were lysed with Cell Disrupter (Constant Systems Ltd) using 20 kpsi and the cell debris was removed. To purify the His-tagged ADO, the supernatant was mixed with 1ml pretreated TALON metal affinity resin and the bound protein was eluted with 20mM sodium phosphate pH 7, 100mM NaCl, 250mM imidazole, and 10% glycerol. The elution fraction with highest protein concentration was identified with Bradford reagent, and the target protein of ADO corresponding ~27kDa was separated with SDS-PAGE (Mini-PROTEAN® TGX, Sigma) and sent to Agrisera to raise a polyclonal antibody against ADO. The function of the antibody was verified in Western blot using different concentrations of fractionated and unfractionated cell samples.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Cell Membrane Isolation Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were homogenized in 4 ml cell lysis buffer (100 mM Tris-HCl at pH 7.5, 5 mM MgSO 4 ) per gram of cells in the presence of 100 mg of a protease inhibitor phenylmethanesulfonyl fluoride (Sigma) and 10 mg DNaseI (Roche). Cells were broken with a cell disrupter with 4 cycles at 35 kPsi (Constant Systems) and cellular debris was removed by centrifugation at 90 000 x g for 20 min at 4 C (45 Ti rotor, Beckman). Membranes were collected by ultracentrifugation at 220 000 x g for 90 min at 4 C (45Ti rotor, Beckman).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Recombinant Glucose Oxidase Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were grown overnight in 50 ml flasks in SD-URA medium at 30°C. After growth cells were inoculated to a cell density of 1 × 107 cells/ml into 1000 ml SG-URA and induction was completed by addition of 1000 μl of a 1 mM ES stock solution. Induction was performed at 25°C for 20 h. Induction of GOase-tGFP expression was checked by flow cytometry. The cells were precipitated and the supernatant was concentrated to 25 ml using a Vivaflow 200, 10.000 MWCO Hydrosart (Sartorius) laboratory crossflow cassette. The cell pellet was resuspended in PBS, disrupted using a cell disrupter (Constant systems LTD) and cell debris was removed by centrifugation. Both supernatant and cell debris were analyzed using sodium dodecyl sulphate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) as well as ABTS assay. SDS-PAGE was performed as described in (19 ).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!