The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

7 protocols using anti ctbp1

1

Western Blot Immunoanalysis Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunoblotting analyses were carried out as described previously24 (link). Digital images were captured using the LAS-1000 Plus (Fujifilm). The following primary antibodies were used: mouse anti-Flag M2 (Sigma), anti-Myc 9E10 (Santa Cruz), and anti-β-actin 2F3 (Wako); rabbit anti-Myc and anti-SP-B (Santa Cruz), anti-CtBP1, anti-CtBP2, anti-SP-C, anti-Muc1 and anti-Abca3 (Abcam), anti-Foxp1 (CST), anti-Foxp2 (Sigma), anti-phospho-ERK1/2 (CST), and anti-ERK2 (Santa Cruz). An affinity-purified anti-MCRIP1 antibody was made in-house as described previously24 (link). All antibodies were used at a dilution of 1:1000 for western blotting. Full size western blot images are shown in Supplementary Fig. 6.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Neonatal Lung Protein Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tissues from neonatal lungs were isolated and samples were prepared for paraffin sections. Sections were stained with the following primary rabbit antibodies: anti-MCRIP1 (Atlas; 1:400); anti-SP-B (Santa Cruz; 1:300); anti-SP-C (Abcam; 1:1000), anti-CtBP1 (Abcam; 1:500) and anti-CtBP2 (Abcam; 1:500); anti-Foxp1 (CST; 1:200) and anti-Foxp2 (CST; 1:2000).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Comprehensive Western Blot Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Protein levels were measured by Western blots as described previously 18 (link). Briefly, cells were lysed in RIPA buffer (ThermoFisher Scientific, #89900). Equal amounts of total cell extracts were loaded into 12% SDS-PAGE gels for electrophoresis, followed by transferring onto polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membranes. The membranes were then incubated with primary antibodies including anti-p53 (Abcam, Cambridge, UK, #ab26), anti-Bax (Abcam, #ab32503), anti-Bim (Abcam, #ab32158), anti-DDB2 (Abcam, #ab51017), anti-TGF-β (Abcam, #ab92486), anti-ROS1 (Abcam, #ab108492), anti-Myc (Sigma-Aldrich, #MABE282), anti-Flag (Sigma-Aldrich, #F3165), anti-IRF1 (Abcam, #ab186384), anti-HDAC2 (Abcam, #ab32117), anti-CtBP1 (Abcam, #ab129181), and anti-GAPDH (Abcam, #ab8245). After incubation with HRP-labeled secondary antibodies, the protein band signals were detected using the PierceTM ECL Western Blotting Substrate (ThermoFisher Scientific, #32106).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Antibody Detection Techniques

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The antibodies used in this study are as follows: Anti-CtBP1 (1:5000, Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA); β-Actin Rabbit mAb (High Dilution) (1:100,000, Abclonal Technology Co., Ltd., Wuhan, China); Goat Anti-Rabbit IgG H, and L (HRP) (1:500, Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA); and Alexa Fluor™ Plus 488 conjugated secondary antibodies (Gibco, Invitrogen Co., Carlsbad, CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Chromatin Immunoprecipitation of Histone Modifications

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The ChIP assays were performed using the SimpleChIP Enzymatic Chromatin IP Kit (CST) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Immunoprecipitants were recovered overnight with specific antibodies or with normal rabbit IgG (CST). The purified DNA was amplified by PCR using the SP-B promoter-specific primers: Sftpb forward, 5′-CAGACAGAAGTCATCCTTGTTGAATG-3′; Sftpb reverse, 5′-ACATGGTACCGACTTGGCC-3′. PCR was performed under the following conditions: 95 °C for 5 min, followed by 30–35 cycles of 95 °C for 30 sec, 58 °C for 30 sec and 72 °C for 30 sec, and a final step of 72 °C for 5 min. The PCR products were subjected to 2% agarose gel electrophoresis. The following rabbit antibodies were used: anti-Histone H3 (CST; 1 μg/sample), anti-Pan-Methyl-Histone H3 (K9) (CST; 1 μg/sample), anti-Acetyl-Histone H3 (K9) (CST; 1 μg/sample), anti-CtBP1 (Abcam; 1 μg/sample), anti-Foxp1 (CST; 1 μg/sample), and anti-Foxp2 (Abcam; 1 μg/sample).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Protein Extraction and Western Blot Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total protein was extracted using the RIPA buffer with 1% PMSF (Beyotime Biotechnology). For the Western blot analysis, PVDF membranes were incubated with the following primary antibodies overnight at 4°C: anti-CTCF (Cell signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA), anti-Histone3 (Beyotime Biotechnology), anti-SRC (Abcam), anti-CTBP1 (Abcam), anti-SERPINE1 (Abcam) and anti-β-actin (Beyotime Biotechnology). After the samples were washed with 0.1% TBST, they were incubated with the appropriate secondary antibodies (Beyotime Biotechnology), and the Chemilmanger™ 5500 system (Alpha Innotech, San Jose, CA, USA) was used to visualize the results. The gray value was calculated using the Image J software (http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij/).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Immunohistochemical Analysis of Protein Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Paraffin-embedded tissue sections were de-paraffinized with xylene, graded ethanol and ddH2O. Antigen retrieval was achieved by incubating the specimens with boiled citrate buffer (10 mM, pH 6.0) for 15 minutes. The tissue sections were subsequently exposed to 3% hydrogen peroxide for 10 minutes to inhibit endogenous peroxidase activity. After blocking with goat serum for 20 minutes at room temperature, the sections were incubated at 4°C overnight with the following primary antibodies: anti-CTCF (Abcam, Cambridge, UK), anti-Ki-67 (Bioss Antibodies Inc., Woburn, MA, USA), anti-SRC (Abcam), anti-CTBP1 (Abcam), and SERPINE1 (Abcam). Then, the sections were incubated with HRP-labeled secondary antibodies at 37°C for 20 minutes and visualized with the DAB detection kit following the manufacturer’s instructions. The negative control samples were incubated with PBS in the absence of primary antibodies. The images were recorded with MCID, and the expression of positive cells was scored as previously described [30 (link)]. Briefly, each sample was assigned an intensity score (0-3) and a percentage of positive cells score (0=0%, 1=1-19%, 2=20-79%, 3=80-100%). An overall IHC score was calculated by multiplying the intensity score and the percentage value of positive cells.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!