The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

28 protocols using hoechst

1

CRISPR-mediated ALMS1 gene editing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HeLa cells were edited with a dual episomal system for homology directed repair (HDR) (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., Dallas, United States). Cells were transfected with Lipofectamine 2000 (Thermo Fisher, Waltham, United States) with 3 gRNAs directed to ALMS1 exons 1 and 3 (Supplementary Table S1) following the manufacture’s protocol. After plasmid transfection, cells were selected with puromycin (1 μg/ml) for 5 days (Supplementary Figure S1).
BJ-5ta cells were edited using a lentivirus system according to the protocol described by Sanjana et al. (2014) (link), with some modifications. Check Supplementary Material for more information. After lentiviral transduction, cells were selected with puromycin (1 μg/ml) for 5 days (Supplementary Figure S2).
Surviving cells were expanded and isolated to obtain individual clones. Of the isolation was performed using Fluorescence-Activated Cell Sorting (FACS) with Hoechst (BD Bioscience, San José, United States) in the flow cytometer FACS ARIA III (BD Bioscience, San José, United States). Inhibition of gene expression was validated by qPCR in a StepOnePlus instrument (Thermo Fisher, Waltham, United States). A commercial probe TaqMan® Gene Expression Assays (Hs00367316_m1) and PrimeTime® qPCR Primer Assays (Hs.PT.56a.488948) were used to detect ALMS1 in the HeLa and BJ-5ta models, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Cell Sorting for Transcriptomic Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells (mock, EPR, EPRSTOPE) were harvested by trypsinization when they reached ~90% confluence, washed once in 1× PBS and resuspended in DMEM without serum at a concentration of 106 cells ml−1. Hoechst 33342 (ThermoFisher Scientific) was added to the media at the concentration of 10 μg ml−1 and cells were incubated for 1 h at 37 °C. Cells were then centrifuged to remove Hoechst-containing media and resuspended in 1× PBS.
Sorting was performed by BD Aria IITM cytometer (BD Bioscience) using a 100 μm nozzle and setting a gate on the population of cells in G1. At least 90 K events for every sample were sorted in 1× PBS at room temperature. After sorting, purity was assessed by re-running the samples. Sorted cells were pelleted and immediately stored at −80 °C. RNA was extracted and analyzed by qRT-PCR as described above.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Tumor Resection and Imaging Cryosections

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
2 or 8 days following exosome or PBS control injection in vivo, tumors were resected and a portion of the tumor was preserved in O.C.T. Compound (Sakura Tissue-Tek, Torrance, CA) and stored at −80° C. 6 μm frozen sections were generated using a Microm HM 525 cryostat (MICROM International GmbH, Walldorf, Germany). Sections were stained with Hoechst (5 μg/mL, BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA) for 5 minutes at room temperature, following nuclei staining coverslips were mounted with Fluormount-G (SouthernBiotech, Birmingham, AL). Photomicrographs were acquired with a Nikon A1 confocal microscope with a 20x objective (6x digital zoom). Z-stacks were merged and channels were combined using ImageJ.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Live Cell Imaging of CSF-1 Signaling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Adherent cells cultured in chamber slides were serum-deprived, then stained with 100 ng/mL Hoechst (BD Biosciences, Le Pont de Claix, France) during 30 min, stimulated 15 min with 1 μg/mL fluorescent CSF-1 before wash and living cell observation with a spinning disk microscope (Andor Technology, Belfast, UK) during 10 min (1-min delay between each image).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Flow cytometry analysis of macrophages

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were harvested by scraping and resuspended in FACS staining buffer (0.9% normal mouse serum, 0.9% normal rabbit serum, 0.9% normal human serum [all Sigma-Aldrich], 3% BSA, 2 mM EDTA in PBS). After antibody staining and washing, cells were resuspended in PBS with Hoechst (BD Biosciences). Counting was performed using a FACSCanto-II (BD Biosciences), and data were analyzed with FlowJo software (TreeStar) by gating on F4/80 and CD11b positive cells.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Modulating Stat3 Signaling Pathway

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The siRNAs for Stat3, Jak2 (pools of three specific 19-25 nt siRNAs) and control siRNA were purchased from Santa Cruz. The Constitutive active Stat3-C plasmid was a kind gift from Professor Zhijie Chang (Tsinghua University) [49 (link)]. Icaritin was purified from Epimedium at the Beijing Shenogen pharma group with over 99 % purity. Cisplatin and AG490 were obtained from Sigma Aldrich. Sorafenib was purchased from Selleck. U0126 was purchased from Cell Signaling Technology and Hoechst was from BD Pharmingen. Human recombinant IL-6 was from Peprotech and S3I-201 was purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Tumor Cell Isolation and Staining

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Calcein AM (BIOTIUM, USA) was used to stain all the MCF-7 cells, and Hoechst (Life, USA) was used to stain the DNA in all the cell nuclei. Labeling was completed by two approaches: one, by putting the staining reagents into the assay directly, and the other by putting into the cell suspension. Next, 1 mL of 1× PBS containing 10 mg mL−1 (1%) bovine serum albumin (BSA, Solarbio, China) and 0.05% Tween-20 was used with cancer cells to reduce the non-specific cell adhesion on the surface of the structure. For cells captured on the Hoechst chip, Cytokeratin-FITC (BD Biosciences) and CD45-PE (BD Biosciences) were used for on-chip staining. A small limited number of unlabeled tumor cells were spiked into the lysed and whole blood. Those artificial patient bloods were processed through the chip followed by washing with PBS, fixing, and permeabilization. Anti-cytokeratin (BD Biosciences) and anti-CD45 (BD Biosciences) and Hoechst applied in 1% bovine serum albumin were utilized for all the samples. After washing, then the samples were ready for microscopic imaging.45 (link)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Single-nucleus RNA-seq from post-mortem brain

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Frozen tissue (~25 mg) from either frontal cortex or cerebellar hemisphere (see table of demographics) was dissected at −20 and subjected to dounce homogenization followed by sucrose gradient centrifugation as previously described. Tissue was primarily BA10 or lateral cerebellar hemisphere although some samples were named only as frontal cortex or cerebellum. Nuclei were filtered and incubated for 5 min in 1:1,000 Hoechst (Invitrogen H3569, Waltham MA). A total of 10,000 Hoechst + nuclei from the suspension were then sorted directly into 10× Genomics RT buffer (Pleasanton, CA) on a chilled plate holder to remove doublets, debris, and dying nuclei on a FACS Aria (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ) with a low-pressure nozzle (SI Appendix, Fig. S2). Following sorting, reverse transcriptase enzyme was added on ice, and nuclei were immediately processed for encapsulation in the 10× Chromium controller. cDNA and libraries were prepared according to the 10× documentation protocol for 3′ gene expression v3 chemistry.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Visualizing Conidia-DC Interactions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To study the interaction of swollen, opsonized and non-opsonized conidia with CRs on DCs, cells were incubated with conidia at a 1:2 ratio. Confocal slides were coated with Poly-L-Lysine (Sigma-Aldrich) for 2h at 37°C. DCs were stained with Hoechst, anti-human CD11b- or CD11c-Alexa594 and anti-human DC-SIGN Alexa633 (all from BD) and added to the PBS washed slides for at least 1h until they were adherent. FITC-labeled opsonized and non-opsonized conidia of the different strains were added to the cells for 6h to have comparable conditions as during binding/internalization experiments evaluated by flow cytometry. Pre-warmed D-PBS was used to remove unbound conidia and slides were fixed using 1% formaldehyde for 20min. Slides were mounted onto coverslips with Mowiol (Sigma) and used for microscopy. Images were acquired on a Leica SP5 (x63 Glycerin) confocal microscope at the Biooptics core facility, CCB, Innsbruck, Austria. Deconvolution was performed using Huygens Professional and images were merged using ImageJ Software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Cell Cycle Analysis via Flow Cytometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
On the day of analysis, cells were pelleted by 500× g at 4 °C and then washed twice with PBS. For 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI)/Ki67 staining, cells were resuspended in 100 µL PBS, and 10 µL Ki67-FITC (Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA) antibody was added for every 1 million cells. After 30 min incubation at room temperature in the dark, cells were washed with PBS then DAPI (1 µg/mL, Sigma-Aldrich, Darmstadt, Germany) was added. Cells were then incubated at room temperature for 15 min. In order to quantify the staining, 355/450 nm excitation/emission was used for DAPI, 488/530 nm excitation/emission was used for Ki67-FITC. The flow cytometry analysis was performed on a BD LSRII Flow Cytometer (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA). The Ki67-negative population threshold was determined based on a DAPI-only staining control. Data were analyzed using FACSDiVa analysis software (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA).
Similarly, the RNA levels were determined using pyronin (4 µg/mL, Acros Organics, Geel, Belgium) and Hoechst (10 µg/mL, BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA) staining. Cells were treated with a mixture of both stains for 30 min in the dark at room temperature, and then underwent flow cytometry analysis. The 355/450 nm excitation/emission was used for Hoechest, while 488/582 nm excitation/emission was used for pyronin.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!