The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

21 protocols using lsm zen software

1

Imaging Protocols for Visualizing Gene Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In situ hybridization images were taken on either a Zeiss AxioScop 2 mounted with an Axiocam camera triggered by Axiovision software (Carl Zeiss), a Zeiss Axio Imager A2 mounted with a Canon 6D triggered by Canon professional software, or a Nikon NTi using a Nikon DS-Ri2 color camera and the Elements software (Nikon). All expression patterns described here have been submitted to Kahi Kai, a comparative invertebrate gene expression database [62 (link)] hosted at http://www.kahikai.org/index.php?content=genes. Scoring of treatment phenotypes was performed on either a Zeiss Z-1 Axio imager or a Zeiss Axio Imager A2 microscope and confocal imaging was conducted on either a Zeiss LSM710 or Zeiss LSM Exciter microscope running the LSM ZEN software (Carl Zeiss). Fluorescent images were false-colored. The fluorescent channels were merged using ImageJ (http://rsbweb.nih.gov/ij/) and cropped to final size in Photoshop Cs6 (Adobe Inc.). Confocal images for Fig. 5 were processed using Imaris 8.1 (Bitplane).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

In situ Hybridization Imaging Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
in situ hybridization images were taken on either a Zeiss AxioScop 2 or a Zeiss Axio Imager A2 mounted with an Axiocam camera triggered by Axiovision software (Carl Zeiss). All expression patterns described here have been submitted to Kahi Kai, a comparative invertebrate gene expression database [41 ] hosted at http://www.kahikai.org/index.php?content=genes. Scoring of treatment phenotypes was performed on either a Zeiss Z-1 Axio imager or a Zeiss Axio Imager A2 microscope and confocal imaging was conducted on either a Zeiss LSM710 or Zeiss LSM Exciter microscope running the LSM ZEN software (Carl Zeiss). Fluorescent images were false-colored, the fluorescent channels merged using ImageJ (http://rsbweb.nih.gov/ij/) and cropped to final size in Photoshop Cs6 (Adobe Inc.).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Replication Dynamics Visualization Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were pulse-labelled with 25 μM of CldU (Sigma-Aldrich) for 20 min, followed by a gentle wash with fresh prewarmed medium and the second pulse of 250 μM of IdU (Sigma-Aldrich) for 20 min. Cells were harvested and DNA fibres prepared as described previously [36 (link)]. CldU was detected with a rat anti-BrdU (OBT0030, Serotec) and a DyLight 550 anti-rat (Thermo Fisher Scientific) antibodies. IdU was detected with a mouse anti-BrdU (347580, Becton Dickinson) and the AlexaFluor-488 anti-mouse antibodies. Images of well-spread DNA fibres were acquired using an LSM800 confocal microscope (Carl Zeiss), a 63 × /1.4 oil immersion objective (Carl Zeiss) and LSM ZEN software. Analysis of double-labelled replication forks was performed manually using LSM ZEN software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantifying Membrane Protein Dynamics via FRAP

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For FRAP measurements, a 63× 1.4-NA Plan-Apochromat objective was used on an inverted LSM800 system. Photobleaching of GFP was performed using four to six rapid scans with the laser at full power. Pre- and post-bleach images were captured at 0.5- to 3-s intervals, using low laser intensity. Fluorescence recovery in the bleached region during the time series was quantified using LSM Zen software (Carl Zeiss MicroImaging). For presentation purposes, 16-bit confocal images were exported in TIFF, and their contrast and brightness were optimized in Adobe Photoshop software or ImageJ. The characteristic fluorescence recovery time (τ) values for membrane-bound Sec24b turnover were calculated from the photobleaching data by fitting the data to a simple exponential equation using Kalaidagraph software (Synergy Software), y=Mf · (1ekt),  where Mf is mobile fraction. R2 = 0.98 and 0.97 for WT and mutant, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Biofilm Formation Assessment by CLSM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To assess biofilm formation, microscopic observations and image acquisitions were performed by CLSM as reported by Sanchez et al.17 We used a Zeiss LSM 780 (Carl Zeiss Co., Ltd, Oberkochen, Germany) on days 3, 5, 7 and 14 after bacterial inoculation into the samples, which were sufficiently long for the biofilm to mature.19 3D images and optical z‐sections were generated using LSM ZEN‐software (Carl Zeiss Co., Ltd). Three image stacks were acquired from each sample at 1‐μm intervals in z‐section from the substratum to the top of the biofilm. Three independent experiments were performed according to the same protocol described above. In total, nine image stacks were acquired and analyzed for each DLC‐coated/uncoated sample.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

DNA Fiber Assay for Replication Fork Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA fiber assays were performed following published protocols72 (link),73 (link). Briefly, PC-3 cells were infected with lentivirus expressing empty vector (EV) or F133V in combination with control or Geminin-specific shRNAs and treated with DMSO or 100 nM VE-822 for 8 h. Cells were first-labeled with 25 mM IdU for 30 min, washed three times with PBS, and second-labeled with 250 mM CldU for 1 h. Labeled cells were harvested, and DNA fibers were spread by gravity. Primary antibody dilutions used were mouse anti-BrdU 1/20 (for IdU) and rat anti-BrdU (for CldU) 1/100. Images of well-spread DNA fibers were acquired using an LSM700 confocal microscope with 100× oil immersion objective (Carl Zeiss). Analysis of double-labeled replication forks was performed manually using LSM ZEN software (Carl Zeiss).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Immunofluorescence Imaging of PARP1 and PAR

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 10 min, incubated in 100 mmol/L glycine for 10 min, permeabilized with 0.5% Triton X-100 for 5 min, and blocked with 1% BSA for 30 min. Primary antibodies (PARP1 and PAR referenced in the above section) were incubated for 2 h at room temperature and secondary antibodies conjugated with Alexa Fluor 488 or Alexa Fluor 555 (CST) were incubated for 1 h. Nuclei were counterstained with DAPI and slides were mounted in Fluoromount-G medium (Electron Microscopy Sciences). Microscope images were acquired using an LSM 710 confocal microscope (Carl Zeiss) mounted on an Axio Observer Z1 microscope (Carl Zeiss) equipped with a Plan-Apochromat X63/1.4 NA oil-immersion objective. Image acquisition and analysis were performed using LSM ZEN software (Carl Zeiss).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

DNA Fiber Assay Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA fiber assays were performed following published protocols (56 (link), 57 (link)). Briefly, PC-3 or U2OS cells were infected with lentivirus expressing EV or CBX3. The cells were first labeled with 25 mM IdU (Cayman, catalog no. 20222-1) for 30 min, washed three times with PBS, and then labeled with 250 mM CldU (Cayman, catalog no. 18155-50) for 1 hour. The labeled cells were harvested, and DNA fibers were spread by gravity. The primary antibodies and dilutions used were mouse anti–5-bromo-2′-deoxyuridine (BrdU) at 1:20 (for IdU) and rat anti-BrdU (for CldU) at 1:100. Images of well-spread DNA fibers were acquired using an LSM700 confocal microscope with a 100× oil immersion objective (Carl Zeiss). Analysis of double-labeled replication forks was performed manually using LSM ZEN software (Carl Zeiss).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Quantifying Hippocampal Neurogenesis in Rats

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To assess the effect of drug/vehicle treatment on newly generated hippocampal neurons, at 24 hours after the last URB597 injection rats were transcardially perfused. Their brains were removed from the skull, post-fixed overnight at 4°C, and transferred first into a 15% sucrose solution, then 24 hours later into a 30% sucrose solution in phosphate-buffered saline. Coronal brain sections (40 μm thick) were then cut and prepared for immunofluorescence analysis with an anti-DCX antibody (1:200; Cell Signaling Technology Inc., Danvers, MA). As previously described (Meneghini et al., 2014 (link)), 15 DCX+ immunopositive cells (5 each in 3 different brain coronal sections) located in the DG blades and bifurcation were randomly chosen and their apical dendrite traced throughout its entire extension at 40x magnification using the Zeiss LSM Zen software. The number of DCX+ neuroblasts/mm3 in the section samples was evaluated using the same software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Confocal Microscopy Imaging Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Microscope images were acquired using a confocal microscope (LSM510; Carl Zeiss) mounted on inverted microscope (Axiovert 100M; Carl Zeiss) equipped with a Plan-Apochromat 63×/1.4 oil immersion objective (Carl Zeiss) at RT. Image acquisition and analysis was performed using LSM ZEN software (Carl Zeiss). Dual-color confocal images were acquired using laser lines 488 and 543 nm for excitation of Alexa Fluor 488 and 568 dyes (Invitrogen), respectively. Automated multichannel image acquisition was performed using high-content screening station scan^R (Olympus) equipped with motorized microscope (IX81; Olympus), UPlanSApo 40×/0.95 air immersion objective (Olympus), and digital monochrome electron multiplying charge coupled device camera (C9100; Hamamatsu). Image acquisition and analysis was performed using scan^R acquisition and analysis software (Olympus).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!