The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Eclipse plus c8 column

Manufactured by Agilent Technologies
Sourced in Germany, United States

The Eclipse Plus C8 column is a high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) column designed for the separation and analysis of a wide range of compounds. It features a C8 stationary phase that provides good retention and selectivity for both polar and nonpolar analytes. The column is suitable for various applications, including pharmaceutical, environmental, and food analysis.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

12 protocols using eclipse plus c8 column

1

Phytochemical Profiling of Calotropis procera Leaves

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The phytochemical compositions of the extract from leaves of Calotropis procera were determined using the HPLC UV–Vis Detectors to find phenolic, flavonoids, and other active compounds, and analysis was performed with an Agilent 1260 series instrument. The analysis was conducted in the Central Labs Unit of the Research National Center, Egypt. Using a Zorbax Eclipse Plus C8 column (4.6 mm × 250 mm i.d., 5 μm), the separation was performed. At a flow rate of 0.9 mL/min, the mobile phase was composed of water (A) and 0.05% trifluoroacetic acid in acetonitrile (B). The following was the sequential linear gradient programming for the mobile phase: 0 min (82% A), 0–1 min (82% A), 1–11 min (75% A), 11–18 min (60% A), 18–22 min (82% A), and 22–24 min (82% A). At 280 nm, the multi-wavelength detector was observed. For every sample solution, there was one injection volume of five microliters. At 40 °C, the column temperature was kept constant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Identification of Phenolic and Flavonoid Compounds in Henna Extract via HPLC

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
UPMH and PMH henna extract were subjected to HPLC (Agilent 1260 series) for phenolic and flavonoid constituents’ detection. The separation process was performed via Zorbax Eclipse Plus C8 column (4.6 mm × 250 mm i.d., 5 μm). The flow rate of the mobile phase (MP) of water (W) and acetonitrile containing 0.05% trifluoroacetic acid (A) was 0.9 mL/min. The MP was automated sequentially in a linear gradient in the flowing order: 0 min (82% W); 82% W from 0–1 min; 75% W from 1–11 min; 60% W from 11–18 min; 82% W from 18–24 min. The ultraviolet (UV) detector was adopted at 280 nm and 330 nm for phenolic and flavonoid constituents’ detection, respectively. The solution of tested samples was injected in volume 5 μL with the column maintained at 40 °C. The input data of standard molecules of phenolic and flavonoids was used for the quantitative determination of the extract’s compounds [14 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

HPLC Analysis of Pollen Grain Phenolics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HPLC (Agilent 1260 series) was used to determine the phenolic and flavonoid contents in the pollen grain extracts. One Zorbax Eclipse Plus C8 column (4.6 mm × 250 mm i.e., 5 μm) was used for the separation process. The mobile phase (MP) consisted of acetonitrile and water (W) with 0.05% trifluoroacetic acid (A) flowing at a rate of 0.9 mL/min. The MP was automatically programmed in the following flowing order, using a linear gradient: 82% W for 0 min, 75% W for 1 min, 60% W for 11–18 min, and 82% W for 18–24 min. The ultraviolet (UV) detector was used to detect flavonoids at 330 nm and phenolic components at 280 nm. The tested sample solution was injected into a volume of 5 μL, while the column was kept at 40 °C. Utilizing standard molecules of flavonoids and phenolic acid as input data, the extract’s chemical composition was semi-quantitatively determined.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

HRMS Analysis of Environmental Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Instrument methods for HRMS analysis are described in detail in Rager et al. (2016) (link) and Newton et al. (2018) (link). Briefly, samples were analyzed using an Agilent 1100 HPLC (Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA) interfaced with an Agilent 6210 Time-of-Flight (TOF) mass spectrometer. Chromatographic separation was accomplished using an Eclipse Plus C8 column (2.1 × 50 mm, 3.5 μm; Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA). The method consisted of the following conditions: 0.2 mL/min flow rate; column at 30 °C; mobile phases: A, ammonium formate buffer (0.4 mM) and DI water/methanol (95:5 v/v), and B, ammonium formate (0.4 mM) and methanol/DI water (95:5 v/v); gradient 0–25 min linear gradient from 75:25 A:B to 15:85 A:B; 25–40 min linear gradient from 15:85 A:B to 100% B; 40–50 hold at 100% B. The total run time was 45 min per sample, and ions from 100 to 1700 m/z were monitored in both positive and negative electrospray ionization (ESI) via separate injections. A reference compound mixture was constantly infused into the ion source for mass correction consisting of purine and hexakis (1H, 1H, 3H-tetrafluoropropoxy) phosphazene. Raw instrument data files were exported for further analysis and compound identification.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantifying Sphingolipids via LCMS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
C17 S1P and C17 Sph were quantified using a ThermoFisher Scientific Quantum Access triple quadrupole mass spectrometer, operated in positive ion mode, coupled to a 2.1 × 100 mm Agilent Eclipse Plus C8 column (1.8 μm pore size). Total HPLC time was 7 min per sample at a flow rate of 0.2 mL/min, using the following gradient: 0 min, 20:80 A/B; 3.75 min, 13.5:86.5 A/B; 6.5 min, 13.5:86.5 A/B; and 7 min, 20:80 A/B. Solvent A: 0.2% formic acid, 2 mM ammonium formate in MilliQ water; Solvent B: 0.2% formic acid, 1 mM ammonium formate in methanol. C17 S1P, C17 Sph, dhS1P (d18:0) and dhSph (d18:0) were analysed in multiple reaction monitoring mode, scanning for the following transitions: m/z 286.1 to 268.0 (C17 Sph), 302.5 to 284.1 (dhSph), 366.1 to 250.1 (C17 S1P), and 382.2 to 284.2 (dhS1P). The scan time for each event was 0.35 seconds. C17 S1P and C17 sphingosine were quantified as ratios to their respective internal standard (dhS1P or dhSph), using external calibration curves.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

High-Performance TLC and RP-HPLC Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
CAMAG TLC scanner, High-performed TLC Alum sheets plated with 60 F254 (0.25 mm) (Merck, DE), and R201 Shang. Shen. Biot. Lim. Co. Camag-Linomat IV applicator were instrumentations in HP-TLC methodology.
1200 infinity series LC (Agilent Technologies), 1260 infinity UV–VIS detector (Agilent Technologies), and Eclipse plus C8 column (15, 4.6 and 5 µm) were instrumentations in RP-HPLC methodology.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Comparison of HPLC and HRMS Analytical Techniques

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
LC-UV was performed using a Shimadzu LC-20A with 20AT binary pump and M20A PDA detector (Kyoto, Japan). Three different columns from Agilent were compared: the ZORBAX Eclipse plus C18 column, Eclipse plus C8 column and Eclipse XDB-CN column (250 × 4.6 mm, 5 μm). LC-HRMS was performed using a Thermo Fisher Vanquish Q-Exactive Plus system, which had a quaternary pump and an orbitrap mass analyzer (San Jose, CA, USA). An XP205 balance from Mettler Toledo (Greifensee, Switzerland) was used to weigh compounds.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Targeted Lipidomics of Sphingolipids

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Lipids were extracted using a 1:1 mixture of methanol and butanol containing a panel of internal lipid standards (Avanti® Polar Lipids). Sphingolipids were quantified using targeted lipidomics on a TSQ Altis triple quadrupole mass spectrometer, following lipid separation using an Agilent Eclipse Plus C8 column on a Vanquish ultra high-performance liquid chromatography system [35 (link)]. Peaks were integrated using Xcalibur [35 (link)]. Absolute concentrations were determined by normalization against corresponding internal standards and tissue weight. Hierarchical clustering was employed to group similar patterns of lipid changes using Euclidean distance and Ward’s algorithm, where Z-scores were calculated to measure the relative deviation of individual lipid concentrations from the mean values (Metaboanalyst 5.0).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Lipidomic Analysis of Systemic Sclerosis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We explored the phospholipid profile in the plasma of patients with SSc using a lipidomics approach utilizing a high-performance liquid chromatography coupled to an ion mobility quadrupole time-of-flight (HPLC-IM-QTOF). The HPLC utilized an Eclipse Plus C8 column (3.5 μm, 3.0 mm × 150 mm, Agilent, Waldbronn, Germany) equipped with a C18 guard column (4 × 3.0 mm, Phenomenex). For measurement, a 1290 Infinity HPLC (Agilent Technologies) coupled to a 6560 IMS-QTOF-MS (Agilent Technologies) was used. For chromatographic separation, solvent A consisted of 60% 18 MΩ-water and 40% acetonitrile with 10 mM ammonium acetate and 1 mM acetic acid, and solvent B was 90% isopropanol, and 10% acetonitrile with 10 mM ammonium acetate and 1 mM acetic acid. The used HPLC gradient started with 60% solvent A and 40% solvent B for 8 min followed by 11 min of 30% A and 70% B and a final step to 10% A and 90% B for 9 min. The flow was 0.7 mL/min, and the injection volume was set to 3 µL. The mass spectrometer was equipped with a Dual Agilent Jet Stream Electrospray Ionization (Dual AJS-ESI, Agilent, Waldbronn, Germany) source, which was operated in positive mode. The scan range was 100 to 1200 m/z. Ion mobility measurement was completed by using N2 as drift gas and 4-bit multiplexing with a trap fill time of 3900 µs and a trap release time of 250 µs.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Comprehensive Liver Lipid Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Lipids were extracted from mouse liver tissues or Huh7 cells in 1 mL methanol containing a cohort of internal lipid standards (Avanti® Polar Lipids, Alabaster, USA). The liver tissues isolated from the first 8 animals of each genotype were analysed. Hepatic levels of TG, CE, and phospholipids were quantified using untargeted lipidomic profiling on a Q Exactive HF-X mass spectrometer, following lipid separation on a Waters Acquity C18 UPLC column [53 ]. LipidSearch software was used for lipid annotation, chromatogram alignment and peak integration [75 (link)]. In contrast, FFAs, DG, FC, and sphingolipids were determined by targeted lipidomics on a TSQ Altis triple quadrupole mass spectrometer, following lipid separation on an Agilent Eclipse Plus C8 column [28 (link), 53 ]. Peaks were integrated using Xcalibur (Thermo Fisher, Waltham, USA) [28 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!