The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

7 protocols using anti flag antibody

1

Detection of FLAG-tagged DN-Tcf4 by Western Blot

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Anti-FLAG antibody (Origene, Rockville, MD) was used to detect the FLAG-tagged DN-Tcf4. Actin was used a loading control using anti-actin antibody (Sigma, St. Louis, MO). Protein isolation and western blotting were performed as previously described [12 (link)-14 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Affinity Purification of αvβ6 Interactors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HEK 293T cells expressing αvβ6 integrin (induced lentiviral expression as described above) were cultured in 100 mm dishes and incubated for 6 h at 37°C with Del-1 (1 μg/mL; R&D Systems) and/or LAP (0.5 μg/mL, R&D Systems). A previously described protocol was used (34 (link)), with some modifications. Briefly, the cells were washed with ice-cold PBS and lysed for 20 min in 900 μL of buffer containing 1% 3-[(3-cholamidopropyl)dimethylammonio]-1-propanesulfonate (CHAPS), 30 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, and complete protease inhibitor cocktail, Next, the mixture was centrifuged at 19,000 × g for 15 min. Cell lysates were precleared for 2 h at 4°C with Protein G Mag Sepharose (GE Healthcare), incubated overnight at 4°C with an anti-Flag antibody (diluted 1:200; OriGene), and then incubated for 5 h with 25 μL of Protein G Mag Sepharose. Complexes containing antibody-bound Ag and coprecipitated proteins were pelleted and washed twice with 1% CHAPS buffer, and then three times with TBS. Bound proteins were eluted with 50 μL of 1× RIPA sample buffer and analyzed by western blotting with antibodies specific for Del-1 (Proteintech), LAP (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), Flag (OriGene), and β-actin (Cell Signaling Technology).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Nur77 Binding Site Identification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
(2 × 107) CD8+ T-cells isolated from peripheral lymph nodes using a CD8+ selection kit (EasySep) were activated with plate bound anti-CD3, CD28 overnight. CD8+ cells were then transfected with Flag-tagged Nr4a1 and cross-linked with 2 mM DSG (Sigma) and 1% formaldehyde methanol-free (Thermo Scientific Pierce). Cells were then lysed in RIPA buffer with protease inhibitors (Sigma), and chromatin was sheared by sonication in a Bioruptor sonicator (Diagenode). Immunoprecipitation was carried out with Dynabeads Protein A (Life Technologies) and Anti-Flag antibody (Origene). DNA was isolated using a ChIP DNA Clean and Concentrator column (Zymo). Target genes were amplified from the isolated DNA using SYBR® green master mixture (Roche). anti-Nur77 (M-210) and Anti-CoREST (Santa Cruz) was used for IP.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

OPN4 Lentiviral Transduction and Immunofluorescence

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The HEK-293T cells or PAN T cells were infected with pCDH-Flag-OPN4 lentivirus. After 48 hours of infection, the cells were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde, then blocked and incubated with anti-Flag antibody (Origene, diluted 1:1000, for OPN4 staining) followed by Alexa Fluor 546-conjugated secondary antibody (Thermo Fisher, diluted 1:200) incubation. Cells were further incubated with 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (Sigma, 50 μg/ml) to stain the nuclei. Finally, the stained cells were visualized by confocal microscope (Zeiss LSM780).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Overexpression and Knockdown of FOXC1 in Breast Cancer Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MCF‐7 and T47D cells were plated in 60‐mm dishes at 80% confluence before 24 h of transfection. FOXC1–myc–flag plasmid was transfected into the MCF‐7 and T47D cells using Lipofectamine 3000 Transfection reagent (Invitrogen, Grand Island, NY) for 24 h. The cells were then screened under 0.8 mg/mL G418 (Invitrogen) for 3 weeks. MCF‐7 and T47D cells with overexpressing FOXC1 were subcloned as MCF‐7‐FOXC1 and T47D‐FOXC1, respectively 16.
BT549 and HCC1806 cells were plated in 60 mm dishes at 80% confluence before 24 h of transfection. FOXC1 shRNAs (Sigma‐Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) were stably transfected into BT549 and HCC1806 cells which have high FOXC1 expression and were selected in 5 μg/mL puromycin. BT549 and HCC1806 cells which have low FOXC1 expression were subcloned as BT549 FOXC1 shRNA and HCC1806 FOXC1 shRNA, respectively.
Expression of FOXC1 was verified by Western blot analysis with anti‐FOXC1 antibody (Cata No. sc21394, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA), antimyc antibody (Cata No. 06‐340; EMD Millipore, San Diego, CA), and antiflag antibody (Cata No. TA50011‐100, Origene, Rockville, MD).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Antibody Validation for Proteomic Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antibodies in this study were as follows: anti-HSC20 westerns were performed either with a custom-made antibody (Genscript) or with a commercial antibody (Sigma #HPA018447). Anti-CIAO1 (sc-374498) and NFS1 (sc-81107) were from Santa Cruz Biotechnology. Anti-nsp13 (NBP2-89168) was from Novus Biologicals. Anti-HSPA9 (HPA000898) was from Sigma. Anti-FAM96B (20108-1-AP) and MMS19 (16015-1-AP) were from Proteintech. Anti-FLAG antibody was from Origene (TA50011). Anti-Strep II (ab184224) was from Qiagen (1023944).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Generation and Validation of FLAG-tagged MAD1

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To generate FLAG-tagged MAD1, the full-length coding sequence of MAD1 was obtained by RT-PCR and subcloned into the pcDNA3.1 vector at the BamHI-XbaI sites, with the primers as following: 5′-ACTGGATCCACGATGATGGACTACAAGGACGATGACGACAAGATGGAAGACCTGGGGAAAACACCA-3′ and 5′-AGCTCTAGACTACGCCACGGTCTGGCGGCTGAAGAG-3′. The MAD1-S214A mutant was generated using the QuikChange II XL Site-directed Mutagenesis Kit (Stratagene, San Diego, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The primers used were 5′-GAACTCCAGGCCGCACAAGAAGCAAGAGCAGACCACGAGCAGC-3′ and 5′-GCTGCTCGTGGTCTGCTCTTGCTTCTTGTGCGGCCTGGAGTTC-3′. The rabbit phosphor-MAD1-S214 antibodies were raised against the KIQELQApSQEARA-NH2 peptide by Abgent (San Diego, CA, USA). Anti-MAD1, anti-γH2AX, and anti-DNA PK were obtained from Abcam (Cambridge, MA, USA). The anti-FLAG antibody was obtained from OriGENE (Rockville, MD, USA), and anti-histone-H3-Ser10p was from Millipore (Billerica, MA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!