The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

42 protocols using fiber analyzer

1

Comprehensive Feed Ingredient Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
According to Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC international [15 ], feed ingredients were analyzed in terms of crude protein (CP; method 976.05), dry matter (DM; method 930.15), ether extract (EE; method 920.39), SDF and IDF (method 991.43). Total dietary fiber (TDF) was calculated as the sum of SDF and IDF. The NDF and ADF were determined using a fiber analyzer (Ankom Technology, Macedon, NY, USA). Gross energy (GE) was determined by an automatic adiabatic oxygen bomb calorimeter (Parr 1281, Automatic Energy Analyzer; Moline, IL, USA). All chemical compositions were analyzed in duplicate
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Proximate and Amino Acid Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Moisture, crude protein, ash, and crude fiber were analyzed according to the standard methods [29 ], and crude lipid extraction was conducted according to the method of Folch et al. [30 (link)]. Moisture was determined by drying the samples at 105°C until a constant weight was measured. Crude protein (N × 6.25) was examined using the Kjeldahl method. Crude lipid was extracted using a chloroform–methanol solvent (2 : 1 v/v), and the solvent was removed using a vacuum concentrator (EYELA, Tokyo, Japan). Ash was measured through incineration in a muffle furnace (Barnstead Thermolyne, Moorhead, MN, USA) at 550°C for 6 h. Crude fiber was measured with a fiber analyzer (ANKOM Technology, Macedon, NY, USA) after digestion with 1.25% sulfuric acid and 1.25% sodium hydroxide solutions. Nitrogen-free extract (NFE) was calculated as 100% − (moisture + crude protein + crude lipid + ash + crude fiber). Gross energy was calculated as 16.7, 37.4, and 16.7 kJ g−1 for crude protein, crude lipid, and NFE, respectively [31 ]. The amino acid composition was determined using a high-speed amino acid analyzer (HITACHI, Tokyo, Japan) after hydrolyzation in a 4 N methane sulfonic acid at 110°C for 24 h.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Biofuel Production Protocol Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The TS and VS for substrates and inoculum could be calculated by Eqs. (1) and (2), based on the standard test methods from APHA (APHA, 2005 ):
where m1 represents the weight of dish (mg), m2 is equal to the weight of fresh sample and dish (mg), m3 is the weight of dried residue and dish (mg), and m4 is assigned to the weight of residue and dish after ignition (mg). A fiber analyzer (ANKOM, New York) was installed to calculate the cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin contents according to the conventional method (Van Soest et al., 1991 (link); Zhao et al., 2017 (link)). The determination of organic elements, including carbon (C), nitrogen (N), hydrogen (H), and sulfur (S), relied on an elemental analyzer (Vario EL cube, Elementar, Germany) (Ning et al., 2018 (link)). The mass balance equation supported the calculation of O content, that is, C + H + O + N = 99.5% (based on VS) (Rincón et al., 2012 (link)). Since then, it was reasonable to compute the theoretical maximum methane yield (TMY, ml/gVS) of substrates and microbial agents using Buswell’s formula (Li et al., 2018 (link)), as shown in Eqs. (3) and (4).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Gestation Basal Forage Nutrient Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The basal forage diet during gestation was sampled weekly and analyzed for DM, ash, N (Kjeldahl method), Ca, P, and ether extract by standard procedures (AOAC, 1990 ) and for NDF and ADF sequentially by methods of Robertson and Van Soest (1981) using a fiber analyzer (Ankom Technology Corp., Fairport, NY). TDN was calculated as 97.6−(0.974 × ADF; D. R. Mertens, personal communication). CP was calculated as N concentration × 6.25.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Comprehensive Nutritional Analysis of TMR

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Diet TMR samples were collected weekly throughout the experiment and composited over the feeding period. The composited sample was dried in a 55 °C oven and ground to pass through a 2 mm screen. Samples were analyzed for dry matter, ash, N (Kjehldahl method), Ca, P, and ether extract by standard procedures (AOAC, 1990). Crude protein was determined by multiplying N by 6.25. Neutral detergent fiber and acid detergent fiber concentrations were determined by the modified method of Van Soest et al. [25 (link)] using a fiber analyzer (Ankom Technology Corp., Fairport, NY, USA). The TMR was also analyzed for concentrations of Cu, Zn, Mo, Fe, and S using inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectroscopy and concentrations of Co and Se via inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry by the Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory at Michigan State University.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Comprehensive Nutrition Analysis Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Ash, dry matter (DM), ether extract (EE) and crude protein (CP) contents of the samples were analysed according to AOAC (2006) . Acid detergent fiber (ADF) and NDF analyses were performed according to Van Soest et al. (1991) using Ankom Fiber Analyzer. Metabolizable energy values of samples were calculated by TSI (1991) .
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Determination of Crude Fiber Content

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Crude fiber was determined by first weighing the filter bag (W1), then 0.5 g of dried sample (W2), that was ground to pass a 1 mm screen, and directly added into a filter bag. A blank bag was weighed and included in digestion, to determine blank bag correction (C1). The bags were sealed within 0.5 cm from the pen edge, using the heat sealer. The bags were placed in a bag suspender. About 2000 mL of temperature acid detergent solution was added into the ANKOM Fiber Analyzer vessel and the suspender was covered. The Fiber Analyzer vessel was set for 60 min. Approximately 2000 mL of hot water was added, and the samples were agitated again. The samples were rinsed for 3–5 min with water until a neutral pH was reached. Excess water was pressed out from the bags. The bags were then placed in a beaker and covered with acetone for 3 min. The bags were removed and pressed again to remove excess acetone. The bags were dried in the oven at 105 °C, for at least 2 h. The bags were cooled to ambient temperature and weighed (W3).
% ADF asis basis:=W3W1 × C1× 100W2
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Comprehensive Nutrient Analysis in Diets

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Ingredient, diets and feces samples were analyzed for GE using an isoperibolic oxygen bomb (Parr Instruments, Moline, IL, USA), DM (method 930.15; AOAC International, 2007), CP (method 990.03; AOAC International, 2007), ash (method 942.15; AOAC International, 2007). The NDF and ADF were determined using fiber bags and Fiber Analyzer equipment (Fiber Analyzer, Ankom Technology, Macedon, NY, USA) following a modification of the procedure of Van Soest et al [13 (link)].
The DE and ATTD of chemical components in diets were calculated according to the total feces collection method, and the DE values of wheat bran and the ATTD of GE and CP were calculated by the difference method. The OM (%) was calculated as the difference between DM (%) and ash (%).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Chemical Analysis of Corn Ingredients

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All chemical analysis were conducted in duplicate and repeated if the results differed by more than 5%. The ingredients used in this experiment were analyzed for dry matter (DM) [16 ], ether extract (EE) [17 (link)], ash [16 ], calcium [16 ], and phosphorus [16 ]. Kjeldahl N was determined according to the method used by Thiex et al. [18 (link)]. The content of neutral detergent fibre (NDF) and acid detergent fibre (ADF) were determined using filter bags and Fiber Analyzer equipment (Fiber Analyzer, Ankom Technology, Macedon, NY) following a modification of the procedure of Van Soest et al. [19 (link)]. Starch content was determined after converting starch to glucose using an enzyme assay kit (Megazym International Ireland, Wicklow, Ireland). The GE of feces, diets and corn samples were measured using an automatic adiabatic oxygen bomb calorimeter (Parr 6300 Calorimeter, Moline, IL). The GE of urine was measured by injecting 4 ml of the sample into 2 filter papers in a special crucible, and dried for 8 h in a 65°C drying oven to determine the energy. The 1,000-kernel weight (g/1,000 seeds) was measured in each sample of test corn by first cleaning it of all foreign materials and then counting 1,000 seeds.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Comprehensive Chemical and Metabolomic Analysis of Animal Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Chemical analyses of all samples were conducted in duplicate. The diet was analyzed including dry matter (DM), crude protein (CP), calcium, total phosphorus (16 ) and ether extract (EE) (17 (link)). Neutral detergent fiber (NDF) and acid detergent fiber (ADF) were measured with filter bags using a Fiber Analyzer (Ankom Technology, Macedon, NY, USA). Gross energy (GE) was determined by an automatic adiabatic oxygen bomb calorimeter (Parr 1281, Automatic Energy Analyzer; Moline, IL, USA) according to previous study (18 (link)).
Blood samples were centrifuged (Biofuge22R; Heraeus, Hanau, Germany) at 3,000 × g for 10 min at 4°C, then the supernatant was transferred to storage tubes and stored at−80°C. After the frozen samples were thawed at 4°C, plasma levels of triglyceride, total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein, low-density lipoprotein, total protein, albumin, and urea nitrogen were quantified using a biological analyzer (7600 Automatic Biological Analyzer; Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan) at the Kangjia Hongyuan Biotech Company (Beijing, China). Sample preparation for metabolomics, UPLC-MS analysis and data mining and processing according to previous study (1 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!