The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Ezna microelute genomic dna kit

Manufactured by Omega Bio-Tek
Sourced in United States

The EZNA MicroElute Genomic DNA Kit is a laboratory product designed to efficiently extract and purify genomic DNA from a variety of sample types, including cells, tissue, and body fluids. The kit utilizes a spin column-based method to isolate high-quality DNA for downstream applications.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

10 protocols using ezna microelute genomic dna kit

1

Analyzing CRISPR Insertion Site and Indel

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Embryonic genomic DNA was collected from 4 dpf embryos and column-purified using the EZNA MicroElute Genomic DNA Kit (Omega BioTek). A primer in the hsp70 element (5’-acctcgtcggggaaaaagtc) paired with either a primer in the forward orientation 5’ upstream to the target site (5’- ccctcaacaaatgtaacacagtca) or a primer in the reverse orientation 3’ downstream to the target site (5’- cgttagggtaagtcatgtcggg) were used to detect forward and reverse insertion respectively. PCR products were cloned into the Zero Blunt TOPO PCR cloning vector (Life Technologies) and sequenced using M13 forward primers. In all founder fish, we observed forward orientation insertion. Details of the cut site and indel formation are described in Table 3.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Genetic Sample Collection and Extraction

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A blood sample was obtained from the median cubital vein for a genetic test. RNA extraction was obtained by using the Direct-zol™ RNA Miniprep Plus TRIzol® In kit (Zymo Research, Irvine, CA, USA), and the E.Z.N.A.® MicroElute Genomic DNA Kit (Omega Bio-Tek, Norcross, GA, USA) was used for DNA extraction by following the manufacturer’s protocols.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Assessing Malaria Parasite Infection Density

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In order to ensure densities were comparable our focal infections were always assessed after 7 days. This means that when we were testing for an impact on the first infection mosquitoes were dissected at experimental day 7 and when we were testing for an impact on the second infection mosquitoes were dissected at experimental day 11 (7 days after the second bloodmeal on experimental day 4). To determine infection status and density ~30 mosquitoes per cage were removed, killed with chloroform and dissected. Midguts were examined for oocyst presence and intensity and infected guts were then placed individually into 30 μL of chilled PBS within 1.5 mL microtubes. Tubes were maintained on ice prior to storage at -80°C. DNA was extracted from individual mosquito midguts using the E.Z.N.A MicroElute Genomic DNA kit (Omega Bio-Tek) as per manufacturer’s instructions, eluted in a total volume 20 μL and stored at -80°C. Clone specific genome numbers were determined by PCR following the methods in [57 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Extracting Genomic DNA from Cod

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Sampled cod eggs were extracted for DNA using the E.Z.N.A MicroElute Genomic DNA Kit (Omega Bio‐tek, Norcross, GA), following the manufacturer's instructions for tissue samples with only one minor modification: the last elution buffer step being done twice through the same filter (25 µl was eluted). Genomic DNA from juvenile and spawning cod was extracted from a small piece of the dorsal fin, using E.Z.N.A Tissue DNA kit (Omega Biotek) following the protocol. DNA from all individual cod samples was quality‐verified and quantified with a NanoDrop instrument (NanoVue Plus, GE healthcare).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Genomic DNA Extraction and Sequencing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA extraction, library preparation, and sequencing DNA was extracted from specimens obtained from various sources (Table 1) using the Omega Bio-tek EZNA MicroElute Genomic DNA Kit (Omega Bio-tek, Norcross, GA) or with a MO-BIO Powermax Soil DNA Isolation Kit. As most of the newly sequenced taxa were small-bodied, in most cases entire specimens were placed directly into lysis buffer, and if size permitted, were ground with a sterile pestle prior to digestion to break open shells. DNA concentration was measured using a Qubit 4 Fluorometer (Thermo Fisher Scienti c, Waltham, MA) with the ds DNA HS kit. Samples that yielded too little DNA for library preparation (Rissoella morrocayensis and Omalogyra atomus) were ampli ed with multiple strand displacement ampli cation using the Illustra Single Cell GenomiPhi DNA Ampli cation Kit (GE Healthcare, Chicago, IL). Dual-indexed sequencing libraries were prepared with the Illumina Nextera Kit (Illumina, San Diego, CA). Library size was assessed via agarose gel following a test PCR (run with provided Illumina primers 1.1 and 2.1, run 95°C for 10 minutes followed by 40 cycles of [95° for 10 seconds, 60° for 30 seconds]). Pooled libraries were sequenced with a 2 X 100 bp paired-end TruSeq 3000/4000 SBS kit on an Illumina HiSeq4000 (Macrogen, South Korea) using 1/24 lane each.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Genomic DNA Extraction and Sequencing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA extraction, library preparation, and sequencing DNA was extracted from specimens obtained from various sources (Table 1) using the Omega Bio-tek EZNA MicroElute Genomic DNA Kit (Omega Bio-tek, Norcross, GA) or with a MO-BIO Powermax Soil DNA Isolation Kit. As most of the newly sequenced taxa were small-bodied, in most cases entire specimens were placed directly into lysis buffer, and if size permitted, were ground with a sterile pestle prior to digestion to break open shells. DNA concentration was measured using a Qubit 4 Fluorometer (Thermo Fisher Scienti c, Waltham, MA) with the ds DNA HS kit. Samples that yielded too little DNA for library preparation (Rissoella morrocayensis and Omalogyra atomus) were ampli ed with multiple strand displacement ampli cation using the Illustra Single Cell GenomiPhi DNA Ampli cation Kit (GE Healthcare, Chicago, IL). Dual-indexed sequencing libraries were prepared with the Illumina Nextera Kit (Illumina, San Diego, CA). Library size was assessed via agarose gel following a test PCR (run with provided Illumina primers 1.1 and 2.1, run 95°C for 10 minutes followed by 40 cycles of [95° for 10 seconds, 60° for 30 seconds]). Pooled libraries were sequenced with a 2 X 100 bp paired-end TruSeq 3000/4000 SBS kit on an Illumina HiSeq4000 (Macrogen, South Korea) using 1/24 lane each.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

PacBio SMRT Sequencing and Genomic Annotation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The genomic DNA was extracted by using the E.Z.N.A.® MicroElute Genomic DNA Kit (Omega Bio-tek, Norcross, GA, USA), according to the manufacturer’s protocol, and quantified by Nanodrop spectrophotometry (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The purified DNA was sequenced by using PacBio Sequel Single Molecule Real-Time (SMRT) sequencing technology. After genome assembly, the coding sequences (CDSs) were predicted using prodigal software (v2.6.3). Common function annotation was performed by BLAST against the NCBI nonredundant protein (NR), cluster of orthologous groups of proteins (COG), gene ontology (GO), Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG), Swiss-Prot, and CAZyme databases.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Quantifying Plasmodium Sporozoite Production

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To quantify how food treatment affected sporozoite production for each infected mosquito, we performed genomic DNA extraction and qPCR analysis for Plasmodium genomes in midguts saved from oocyst dissection. Plasmodium genomic DNA was extracted from midguts using the E.Z.N.A. MicroElute Genomic DNA kit (Omega Bio-Tek, as per the manufacturer’s protocol). DNA was eluted in 20 μL of molecular grade water, and the number of parasite genomes present in midguts was quantified using a previously developed qPCR assay [47 (link)]. Briefly, reactions were run on an ABI Prism 7500 Sequence Detection System (TaqMan). Initial denaturation was 20 seconds at 95°C followed by 40 cycles of a three-second 95°C denaturation period and a 30-second 60°C period of annealing and extension. Primers and probes were designed to amplify DNA from several Plasmodium species. We constructed standard curves for P. yoelii genome detection by extracting DNA from a known number of infected mouse red blood cells using the BloodPrep kit (Applied Biosystems) on the ABI Prism 6100 Nucleic Acid Prep Station (as per the manufacturer’s protocol). Parasite production per oocyst was evaluated by dividing the total number of parasite genomes by the number of oocysts quantified for each midgut. We used both sporozoite production per midgut and per oocyst as measures of the efficiency of parasite replication.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Genomic DNA Extraction and Sequencing Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA was extracted from specimens obtained from various sources (Table 1) using the Omega Bio-tek EZNA MicroElute Genomic DNA Kit (Omega Bio-tek, Norcross, GA) or with a MO-BIO Powermax Soil DNA Isolation Kit. As most of the newly sequenced taxa were small-bodied, in most cases entire specimens were placed directly into lysis buffer, and if size permitted, were ground with a sterile pestle prior to digestion to break open shells. DNA concentration was measured using a Qubit 4 Fluorometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) with the ds DNA HS kit. Samples that yielded too little DNA for library preparation (Rissoella morrocayensis and Omalogyra atomus) were amplified with multiple strand displacement amplification using the Illustra Single Cell GenomiPhi DNA Amplification Kit (GE Healthcare, Chicago, IL). Dual-indexed sequencing libraries were prepared with the Illumina Nextera Kit (Illumina, San Diego, CA). Library size was assessed via agarose gel following a test PCR (run with provided Illumina primers 1.1 and 2.1, run 95 °C for 10 min followed by 40 cycles of [95° for 10 s, 60° for 30 s]). Pooled libraries were sequenced with a 2 × 100 bp paired-end TruSeq 3000/4000 SBS kit on an Illumina HiSeq4000 (Macrogen, South Korea) using 1/24 lane each.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Genomic DNA Extraction and Sequencing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA was extracted from specimens obtained from various sources (Table 1) using the Omega Bio-tek EZNA MicroElute Genomic DNA Kit (Omega Bio-tek, Norcross, GA) or with a MO-BIO Powermax Soil DNA Isolation Kit. As most of the newly sequenced taxa were small-bodied, in most cases entire specimens were placed directly into lysis buffer, and if size permitted, were ground with a sterile pestle prior to digestion to break open shells. DNA concentration was measured using a Qubit 4 Fluorometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) with the ds DNA HS kit. Samples that yielded too little DNA for library preparation (Rissoella morrocayensis and Omalogyra atomus) were amplified with multiple strand displacement amplification using the Illustra Single Cell GenomiPhi DNA Amplification Kit (GE Healthcare, Chicago, IL). Dual-indexed sequencing libraries were prepared with the Illumina Nextera Kit (Illumina, San Diego, CA). Library size was assessed via agarose gel following a test PCR (run with provided Illumina primers 1.1 and 2.1, run 95C for 10 minutes followed by 40 cycles of [95 for 10 seconds, 60 for 30 seconds]). Pooled libraries were sequenced with a 2 × 100 bp paired-end TruSeq 3000/4000 SBS kit on an Illumina HiSeq4000 (Macrogen, South Korea) using 1/24 lane each.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!