The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Columbus software

Manufactured by PerkinElmer
Sourced in United States

Columbus software is a powerful image analysis platform developed by PerkinElmer. It provides advanced tools for the management, visualization, and analysis of high-content screening data. Columbus software enables researchers to extract quantitative information from complex cellular and subcellular images, supporting diverse applications in life science research.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

98 protocols using columbus software

1

Immunofluorescence Staining and High-Content Imaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
On day 14 of differentiation, cells were treated with indicated compounds for 6 h, medium was removed and the cells were washed twice with PBS + /+ (containing Mg2+ and Ca2+, Sigma Life Sciences). By adding 4% PFA with 0,1% Triton-X100, cells were fixed and permeabilized. After three washing steps with PBS + 0,1% Triton-X100, cells were incubated for 1 h at room temperature for blocking with 5% normal goat serum (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Cells were again washed three times with PBS + 0,1% Triton-X100 and incubated with Hoechst 33342 (Sigma, 1:10,000) for 20 min at room temperature. Imaging was performed using an Operetta high-content system and images were analyzed with the Columbus software (PerkinElmer).
For live/dead discrimination, cells were live-stained with 5 µg/ml Propidium iodide (Invitrogen) after 6 h of compound treatment and imaged with an Operetta high-content system. Image analysis was done with the Columbus software (PerkinElmer).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Multiparametric Analysis of Cellular Senescence

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For SA-β-Galactosidase assay, cells were washed with PBS 1X, fixed for 5 min in 2% formaldehyde/0.2% glutaraldehyde, rinsed twice in PBS 1X, and incubated at 37 °C overnight in SA-β-Galactosidase staining solutions, freshly prepared (40 mM citric acid/Na phosphate buffer, 5 mM K3[Fe(CN)6], 5 mM K4[Fe(CN)6] 3H2O, 150 mM sodium chloride, 2 mM magnesium chloride, 1 mg/mL X-gal in distilled water). For crystal violet assay, cells were washed with PBS 1×, fixed for 15 min in 3.7% formaldehyde and stained with crystal violet. For EdU Assay, Click-iT™ EdU Alexa Fluor™ 488 Imaging Kit was used according to manufacturer’s recommendations (ThermoFisher Scientific). For JC1, JC1-Mitochondrial Membrane Potential Assay Kit (ab113850, Abcam) was used. JC1 monomers and aggregates were both excited at 488 nm. Detection of fluorescence for JC1 monomers and aggregates were performed respectively at 530 and 590 nm. Ratio F(aggregate)/F(monomer) was subsequently evaluated using Columbus™ software (PerkinElmer) at the single-cell level. Cell Meter™ Mitochondrial Hydroxyl Radical Detection Kit (ATT Bioquest) allowed detection of mitochondrial ROS according to manufacturer’s recommendations. Excitation was monitored at 488 nm, and fluorescence emission was measured at 530 ± 30 nm using Columbus™ software (PerkinElmer) at the single-cell level.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

High-content Microscopy for DNA Damage

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were pre-extracted for 1 min in ice cold PBS 0.2% Triton-X100, fixed with 4% formaldehyde for 20 min. Coverslips were blocked in 1% BSA for 1 h and incubated in primary antibodies overnight at 4 °C, RPA32 (RPA2) (Ms, MABE285, 1:500) and Phospho-Histone H2A.X (γH2AX) (Ser139) (Rb, 20E3, Cell Signalling Technology, 1:400). Coverslips were incubated in secondary antibodies for 1 h at RT; anti-mouse Alexa Fluor 488 and anti-rabbit Alexa Fluor 647 1:2000 (Life Technologies). Coverslips were then incubated in Hoechst (Invitrogen) 1:10,000 for 5 min and mounted with Fluoroshield (Sigma). Images were obtained by confocal microscopy with a Leica TCS SP5 or SPE2 ×63 objective lens using LASAF. Images were processed in Fiji.
For EdU incorporation evaluated by microscopy cells were reverse transfected and seeded at density 6000 cells/well in 96-well plate (PerkinElmer, CellCarrier). Twenty-four hours after transfection, cells were incubated with 10 µM EdU for 30 min, then were fixed with 4% formaldehyde for 20 min, permeabilised with 0.5% TritonX in PBS for 5 min and EdU was detected by ClickIT reaction (Life Technologies). Cells were stained with 2 µg/ml DAPI solution in PBS for 30 min. Images were acquired by Opera Phenix HCS System with Harmony (PerkinElmer) and analysed in Columbus software (PerkinElmer) and custom-made RStudio script available upon request.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Immunohistochemical Analysis of NNMT in Lung and Liver

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After anaesthesia (thiopental 120 mg/kg, i.p.), small fragments of lung and liver tissue were collected, washed in PBS solution, and then placed in 50 % OCT solution (SakuraTek, Japan) overnight for cryoprotection. Samples were then placed into OCT freezing compound and snap-frozen at -80C. OCT frozen liver and lung tissues were cut into 10 μm-thick cross-sections using a Leica CM1920 automatic cryostat and placed on poly-L-lysine-covered microscopic slides (Metzel Glaser Super Frost). Collected slides were immunostained using rabbit-anti-mouse NNMT (Abcam) primary antibody, followed by Cy3-conjugated goat-anti-rabbit secondary antibody (Jackson Immuno Research). Images were acquired using an AxioCam MRc5 digital camera and an AxioObserver.D1 inverted fluorescent microscope (Zeiss), stored as tiff files and analyzed automatically using Columbus software (version 2.4.2, Perkin Elmer).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Infecting A549 Cells with Virus

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To infect A549 cells, virus was diluted to the required MOI in F‐12 infection media [F‐12 media supplemented with 0.2% (w/v) bovine serum albumin (BSA) and 10 mm HEPES (both Sigma), pH 6.8], and incubated with cells for 5.5–6 h at 37 °C. Infected cells were detected by immunofluorescence staining, as described below, using antibodies against the viral envelope glycoproteins. An Opera confocal microscope (Perkin‐Elmer) was used to image cells and the number of infected cells counted using the columbus software (Perkin‐Elmer).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Perfusion Imaging in Microvascular Networks

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Opera Phenix (Perkin Elmer) was used to produce images of perfusion. Perfusion images were taken at single z-plane for both brightfield and Cy3 channels (ex: 554 nm, em: 568 nm). 70 kDa Texas Red Dextran (ThermoFisher Scientific, D1864) was used to observe the perfusion of the parent channels via microvascular network in the gel chamber. Columbus software (Perkin Elmer) was used for further qualitative analysis. ImageJ was used to stitch different fields in wells if images were acquired at objectives higher than 10x, i.e., 20x, 40x.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

High-Content Imaging of GR-TRβ Translocation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A PerkinElmer (Waltham, MA) Opera QEHS High-Content Screening platform was used for fully automated confocal collection of images. This system employed a 40x water immersion objective lens, laser illuminated Nipkow disk, and cooled CCD cameras to digitally capture high-resolution confocal fluorescence micrographs (300 nm pixel size with 2×2 camera pixel binning). An image analysis pipeline was customized using the Columbus software (PerkinElmer) to automatically segment the nucleus using the DRAQ5 channel and then construct a ring region (cytoplasm) around the nucleus mask for each cell in the digital micrographs. The pipeline filtered only for cells expressing GFP-GR- TRβ out the cells then measured the mean GFP-GR- TRβ intensity in both compartments in the GFP channel, and translocation was calculated as a ratio of these intensities. Each value was further normalized to the value for the control (DMSO) sample on the same plate.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Flexible Substrate Cell Adhesion Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Flexible substrates were made by casting solutions containing different concentrations of acrylamide and bis-acrylamide (Sigma) as described by Tse and Engler (2010 ) onto glass coverslips functionalized with NaOH followed by APTMS and glutaraldehyde (Sigma). Cured gels were incubated with 25 μM sulfo-SANPAH (Thermo-Pierce) in 50 mM HEPES (pH 8.5) under UV light for 10 min, washed, and incubated with 50 μg/ml fibronectin (Sigma) in PBS overnight at 4°C. Glass coverslips were also coated with 50 μg/ml fibronectin. Cells were plated on PA gels for 3 days, fixed and stained, mounted using Fluoromount G (Southern Biotech), and imaged using a Nikon Eclipse epifluorescence microscope (20×). Analysis was performed using Columbus software (PerkinElmer).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Immunocytochemical Analysis of hESC-OVs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
NRL+/eGFP hESC-OVs were dissociated with papain (Worthington Biochemical Corp.) and plated on 96 well plates coated with poly-L-lysine at 40,000 cells/well. ICC was performed and cell counting was done using unbiased HCIA (Operetta, Perkin Elmer). 20 fields were captured in each well of a 96 well plate at 20X magnification (n = 6 per time point) and images were imported into Columbus software for analysis (Perkin Elmer). Pyknotic nuclei were excluded based on size, shape, and DAPI fluorescence intensity, as were all cells touching borders. Positive cells were determined by scatter plot gating of fluorescence intensity. Identical parameters for positive cell identification were used across samples for consistency.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Imaging Organoid-Stromal Interactions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Real-time qPCR was performed as previously described (24 (link)). qPCR primers are listed in Table S1. To image organoid–stromal interactions, stroma from RosamTmG mice was purified, cultured, and mixed with intestinal crypts derived from gender-matched Lgr5-IRES-CreERT2-EGFP mice and cultured in medium with no externally added R-spondins for 5 d. Thereafter, growth medium was pulsed with 2.5 μM Hoechst 33343, and organoids were imaged as soon as nuclei were labeled (typically within 10–15 min) using a Zeiss LSM 710 confocal microscope. Immunohistochemistry was performed as outlined in Supporting Information. An Operetta high-content screening system (PerkinElmer) was used to image stromal cell cultures. Image analysis and quantification procedures were performed using Columbus software (PerkinElmer).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!