The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

159 protocols using qubit assay

1

Double-Digest RAD Sequencing of Wadi Sareen Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA extracts from blood and ear tissue samples from Wadi Sareen were assessed for DNA quality via agarose gel electrophoresis on a 2% gel, and 21 samples (TAH044-55, TAH057-59 and TAH060-64) with suitable non-degraded DNA selected for the library preparation stage. DNA was quantified using a Qubit Assay (Thermofisher Scientific) and normalised to 7 ng–1 µl.
A double digest RAD (ddRAD) library was produced according to a modified protocol of Peterson et al. (2012 (link)) (see also Bourgeois et al. (2018 (link)) for the modified protocol) using the restriction enzymes SphI and SbfI and a gel excision section of 320–590 bp following restriction of the DNA with the two enzymes. Individuals in the library were barcoded using a barcode on each end of the fragment (double barcode combination) and each individual was repeated twice with a different barcode across the library to improve evenness of coverage. The barcoding system allows DNA from multiple individuals to be “tagged” and pooled into a single lane of sequencing. An additional positive control was included to allow for quality control of the experimental process and for assessment of genotyping error-by-read depth. The resulting library was quantified using a Qubit Assay (Thermofisher Scientific) and then sequenced in both directions (Read 1 and Read 2) using a single lane of MiSeq Sequencing Technology (Illumina).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Microarray Analysis of Total RNA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We extracted the total RNA from the six experimental individuals (three animals per group) by Trizol (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA), the RNA was then treated by DNase digestion and purified by Qiagen RNeasy column (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA), as previously described [35 (link)]. We checked the integrity and quality by a NanoDrop 1000 spectrophotometer and by visualization on a 1.5% agarose gel. The microRNA-Seq library was built utilizing NEBNext Multiplex Small RNA Library Prep Set for Illumina (Set 1) following the instructions provided by the manufacturer (NEB, E7300S/L, USA). The library construction was started with 800ng total RNA. Firstly, the 3’ adaptor and 5’ adaptor were sequentially ligated to the RNA. Then, we performed the reverse transcription to synthesize the first strand. Next, we executed the PCR amplification and added the 6-bp index to the DNA products; different libraries were assigned different indexes. Subsequently, we selected and recycled the DNA fragments from 140 to 150 bp using 6% polyacrylamide gel (6% Novex® TBE PAGE gel, Life Technology, USA), which were corresponding to RNAs from 21 to 30 bp. After purification, the concentration was measured by the Qubit assay (Life Technology, Q32850). Finally, we sequenced the libraries identified by the 6-bp index through an Illumina HiSeq 2000 sequencer, as described previously [36 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

DNA Adapter Ligation for Deep Sequencing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To connect the DNA adaptors for deep sequencing, the plasmids extracted from the libraries were amplified using Phusion High-Fidelity DNA Polymerase (ThermoFisher) in a two-step PCR protocol.
PCR 1:
(barcode: CTCTTTCCCTACACGACGCTCTTCCGATCT)
>forward (seg1):<barcode>AGGGTCGGCTAGCCATATG
>forward (seg2):<barcode>GCCGGGTCAGAAAACCGAA
>forward (seg3):<barcode>ATCCAACTGCACGGTCCG
>forward (seg4):<barcode>GGTTCCGAATCTCGTTTCTTTG
>reverse: CTGGAGTTCAGACGTGTGCTCTTCCGATCTCATCTACACTGTTGTTATCAGATCT
The PCR product for each population (expressed and top 15% of binders for each of the four libraries) was cleaned using Agencourt AMPure XP (Beckman Coulter, Inc.) and 1 μl from a 1:10 dilution was taken to the next PCR step for index labeling using KAPA Hifi DNA-polymerase (Kapa Biosystems, London, England):
>forward: AATGATACGGCGACCACCGAGATCTACACTCTTTCCCTACACGACGC
>reverse: CAAGCAGAAGACGGCATACGAGATGTGACTGGAGTTCAGACGTGTGC
Top 15% - index: CAATAGTC
Expressed - index: TTGAGCCT
All the primers were ordered as PAGE-purified oligos. The concentration of the PCR product was measured using Qu-bit assay (Life Technologies, Grand Island, New York).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Gut Microbiota Profiling via NGS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Microbiota analyses were outsourced to an external laboratory. Investigation of microbial communities (Metabarcoding analysis) in each frozen fecal sample was performed by amplicon sequencing of a hypervariable genomic region (V3-V4 region 16SrRNA gene amplification) using an NGS approach on Illumina Platform. Total DNA was extracted from each fecal sample using a commercial kit (QIAamp DNA Stool Mini Kit, QIAGEN S.r.l.). The quality of the genomic DNA was verified using a 2200 TapeStation DNA Screen Tape device (Agilent) and an ND-1000 spectrophotometer (NanoDrop) and its concentration ascertained using a Qubit assay (Life Technologies). The DNA was normalized to 5 ng/μL and then 2.5 μL was used for PCR amplification. Indexed NGS libraries were evaluated with the D1000 screen Tape (Agilent Tape Station 2200) and then quantified with ABI9700 qPCR instrument using the KAPA Library Quantification Kit in triplicates, according to the manufacture's protocol (Kapa Biosystems). Five μL of the pooled library at a final concentration of 4 nM were used for sequencing using Illumina Miseq with a 250 Paired end-read sequencing module.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

16S rRNA Sequencing of Fecal Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The composition of human fecal samples was analyzed by 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing as previously described (Faith et al., 2013 , Reyes et al., 2013 (link)) and in Contijoch et al. BioRxiv, 2018. DNA was extracted by bead-beating followed by QiaQuick columns (QIAGEN) and quantified by Qubit assay (Life Technologies). The V4 region of the 16S gene was amplified by PCR and paired-end 250bp reads sequenced on an Ilumina MiSeq. Analysis was performed with MacQIIME 1.9.1.8 (Caporaso et al., 2010 (link)) and using open source R packages. OTUs were picked with 97% sequence similarity. OTUs were aligned to the Greengenes reference set, requiring 150bp minimum sequence length and 75% ID.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Hybrid Genome Sequencing Approach

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genomic DNA was extracted using the EZ1 biorobot (Qiagen, Courtaboeuf, Les Ulis, France) with the EZ1 DNA tissue kit and then sequenced on the MiSeq technology (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) with the Nextera Mate Pair sample prep kit and Nextera XT Paired end (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA), as previously described [23 (link)]. In order to improve the genome sequence, an Oxford Nanopore approach was performed on 1D genomic DNA sequencing for the MinIon device using an SQK-LSK109 kit. The library was constructed from 1 µg genomic DNA without fragmentation and end repair. Adapters were ligated to both ends of genomic DNA. After purification on AMPure XP beads (Beckman Coulter Inc, Fullerton, CA, USA), the library was quantified by a Qubit assay with the high sensitivity kit (Life technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA). A total of 1047 active pores were detected for the sequencing and the WIMP workflow was chosen for bioinformatic analysis in real time. After 1 h of run time and end life of the flowcell, 617,960 reads were generated as raw data.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Generation and Purification of Cmr2 and Palm Mutants

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cmr2 mutants HDm (H13A, D14A) and Palmm (D673A, D674A) were generated by PCR mutagenesis (primers in Supplemental Table S2). Expression and purification of both recombinant wild type and mutants, including Cmr4-D26N (Ramia et al. 2014a (link)), was performed as described (Hale et al. 2009 (link), 2014 (link)) with the following modifications: Cells were lysed, and protein was purified in buffer containing 40 mM Tris-Cl (pH 7.5), 500 mM NaCl, and 0.2 mM PMSF. Purified proteins were dialyzed into 40 mM Tris-Cl (pH 7.5) and 500 mM NaCl and quantified by Qubit assay (Life Technologies).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

ChIP-qPCR Validation of HyCCAPP Targets

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
ChIP followed a previously described protocol [14 (link)] with a few modifications. Briefly, TAP-tagged cells were grown for each protein to be validated under the same conditions as for HyCCAPP experiments. Cells lysed in nuclear lysis buffer (75mM NaCl, 75mM Tris pH 8, 1% SDS, protease inhibitors) were kept cold and sonicated to an average size of 500 bp. Samples were centrifuged at 14,000 rpm for 10 minutes at 4 °C. The chromatin and protein content in the supernatant was measured by a Qubit assay (Life technologies). For each IP, 4 μg of chromatin (approx. 700 μg of protein) was diluted in 5 volumes of IP dilution buffer (0.92 % Triton X-100, 0.008 % SDS, 1mM EDTA, 13.9mM Tris–HCl pH 8, 13.9mM NaCl, 12.5mM sodium butyrate) and pre-cleared with A/G-sepharose beads for 30 min at 4 °C. Samples were immunoprecipitated overnight at 4 °C with a TAP-Tag antibody (Thermo Scientific), followed by 90 min incubation at 4 °C with protein A/G-sepharose beads. Beads were washed, eluted and formaldehyde crosslinks reversed in 300mM NaCl. The qPCR analysis was run as described above. Three different qPCR assays (Supporting Information Table S3) accounted for the potential difference in size between the HyCCAPP targets and the ChIP fragments.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

RNA Sequencing of pMSCs in Culture

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The total RNA from LP and HP pMSCs cultured in FM and XM were isolated and sequenced by following the previously published protocol (29 ). Briefly, the RNA was quantified and qualified using Agilent2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA, USA) and Qubit Assay (Life Technologies). RNA with a RNA integrity number (RIN) of 10 was used. KAPA RNA HyperPrep Kit with RiboErase was used to prepare the cDNA libraries following the manufacturer’s protocol and sent for RNA-seq transcriptome analysis.
GENEWIZ (South Plainfield, NJ, USA) performed 2 × 150 bp paired-end read sequencing on the Illumina NovaSeq/HiSeq. An average of 47 million reads was obtained for each sample. Fragments were mapped to reference human genome assembly hg38, and differential gene expression analysis was performed using the Galaxy platform (https://usegalaxy.org/) (30 (link)), as detailed below. RNA-Seq analyses were performed on three independent biological replicates.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Deep Sequencing Library Preparation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In order to connect the adaptors for deep sequencing, the membrane-spanning segments were amplified from the p-Mal plasmids using KAPA Hifi DNA-polymerase (Kapa Biosystems, London, England) using a two-step PCR.
PCR 1:
>forward
CTCTTTCCCTACACGACGCTCTTCCGATCTCTTGGGGAATCGACTCGAG
>reverse
CTGGAGTTCAGACGTGTGCTCTTCCGATCTGTTTAAAGCTGGATTGGCTTGG
1μl of the PCR product was taken to the next PCR step:
>forward
AATGATACGGCGACCACCGAGATCTACACTCTTTCCCTACACGACGC
>reverse barcode 1
CAAGCAGAAGACGGCATACGAGAT <barcode>GTGACTGGAGTTCAGACGTGTGC
>reverse barcode 2
CAAGCAGAAGACGGCATACGAGAT <barcode>GTGACTGGAGTTCAGACGTGTGC
The DNA samples from each of the populations (unselected; ampicillin-selected; and chloramphenicol and ampicillin selected) were PCR-amplified using DNA barcodes for deep sequencing. The following barcodes were used:
>barcode1
TCGCCAGA
>barcode2
CGAGTTAG
>barcode3
ACATCCTT
>barcode4
GACTATTG
All the primers were ordered as PAGE-purified oligos. The concentration of the PCR product was verified using Qu-bit assay (Life Technologies, Grand Island, New York).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!