The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

4 protocols using horseradish peroxidase conjugated anti mouse igg

1

Comprehensive Antibody Characterization Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Primary antibodies used in the current study were as follows: anti-XCAP-C (in-house identifier: AfR8) [33 (link)]; anti-CAP-E (in-house identifier: AfR9) [33 (link)]; anti-XCAP-D2 (in-house identifier: AfR16) [25 (link)]; anti-XCAP-H (in-house identifier: AfR20) [25 (link)]; anti-pT1314-XCAP-D2 (in-house identifier: AfR42-P) [25 (link)]; anti-pT1348-XCAP-D2 (in-house identifier: AfR44-P) [25 (link)];anti-pT1353-XCAP-D2 (in-house identifier: AfR46-P) [25 (link)]; anti-hCAP-D2 (in-house identifier: AfR51-5L) [34 (link)]; anti-pT1339-hCAP-D2 (in-house identifier: AfR173-4P) [32 (link)]; anti-pT1384-hCAP-D2 (in-house identifier: AfR175-4P) [32 (link)]; anti-FLAG M2 (Sigma, F-1804 [RRID: AB_262044]); anti-PSTAIR (Abcam, ab10345, [RRID: AB_297080]); anti-pT161-Cdk1 (Cell Signaling Technology, 9114, [RRID: AB_2074652]). Secondary antibodies used in the current study were as follows: horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG (Vector Laboratories, PI-1000 [RRID: AB_2336198]); horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-mouse IgG (Vector Laboratories, PI-2000 [RRID: AB_2336198]); IRDye 680RD goat anti-rabbit IgG (LI-COR Biosciences, 925–68071 [RRID: AB_2721181]); IRDye 800CW goat anti-mouse IgG (LI-COR Biosciences, 925–32210[RRID: AB_2687825]).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Western Blot Analysis of Ninjurin-1

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Western blotting was performed as described previously [7 (link)]. Briefly, protein lysates (2 µg/µl) were separated by 10% sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, and the resolved proteins were immunoblotted onto nitrocellulose membranes (Whatman, Dassel, Germany). The residual binding sites on the membranes were incubated with mouse monoclonal anti-Ninjurin-1 antibody (1:1,000 dilution, BD Transduction Laboratories, CA, USA). The membranes were washed three times in Tris-buffered saline containing 0.1% Tween-20 and then incubated with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-mouse IgG (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA). Immunoreactive bands were visualized using a BS ECL Plus kit (Biosesang, Seongnam, Korea) according to the manufacturer's protocol. After imaging, the membrane was stripped and reprobed using mouse anti-β-actin antibody (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). Immunoblot signals were detected by Fusion Solo 6X (Vilber Lourmat, Collegien, France) and analyzed using FUSION® software. The expression values were normalized to that of β-actin. The cerebrum band in each panel was used as a standard for normalization, and the relative density of each band was calculated. The results are presented as the mean±standard error.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantification and Visualization of Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Protein concentration of the purified CP sample was measured by Bradford Assay (BioRad, Hercules, CA, USA). For gel analysis, loading buffer containing 0.1 M DTT was added to the amount of purified CP sample containing ~60 μg protein, heated to 70 °C for 10 min, electrophoresed on 4–20% gradient SDS-polyacrylamide gel (BioRad), and electrotransferred to PVDF membrane (Hybond-P, Amersham). Blotting was ascertained by visualization of protein bands on the membrane by Ponçeau S (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA). Afterwards, the stain was completely removed by repeated washing with triple distilled water. The membrane was immersed in 5% nonfat dry milk-PBS-Tween for 30 min, and probed with AGR2 antibody (1:2,000; clone 1C3, Abnova, Taiwan), or PSA antibody (1:1,000; clone A67-B/E3, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX, USA) for 60 min, followed by horseradish peroxidase conjugated anti-mouse IgG (1:5,000; Vector, Burlingame, CA, USA). After washing, the membrane was incubated with Luminol (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), and the immunoreactive bands were visualized using Biomax MR light film (Kodak, Rochester, NY, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantifying UCH-L1 and UCH-L3 Protein Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tissue extracts or cell lysates were subjected to sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide
gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) using 12.5% gel for UCH-L1 protein. After being separated
by electrophoresis, proteins were transferred to a polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membrane
and blocked with 5% nonfat dry milk in PBS plus 1% Tween 20 (PBST) for 1 h at room
temperature. The membranes were incubated with anti-UCH-L1 antibody (1:20,000),
anti-UCH-L3 antibody (1:1,000) or anti-β-actin antibody (1:20,000) as an internal control
overnight at 4°C. Then, the membranes were subsequently incubated with horseradish
peroxidase-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG (1:10,000) or horseradish peroxidase-conjugated
anti-mouse IgG (1:10,000) (Vector Laboratories) for 1 h at room temperature.
Immunoreactions were visualized by ECL plus (GE Healthcare, Piscataway, NJ, USA) and were
detected using a CCD camera system (LAS-4000, Fujifilm, Tokyo, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!