The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

3200 q trap system

Manufactured by AB Sciex
Sourced in United States

The 3200 Q TRAP system is a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) platform designed for sensitive and accurate quantitative analysis. The system combines a triple quadrupole mass analyzer with a linear ion trap, providing enhanced selectivity and sensitivity for targeted and discovery-based applications. The 3200 Q TRAP system is capable of performing multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) and information-dependent acquisition (IDA) analyses.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

7 protocols using 3200 q trap system

1

Quantification of SSA and Metabolite SA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SSA was administered to C57B6 mice of both males and females via oral garage as a single bolus dose. Mice were sacrificed at predetermined time points and plasma and brain tissue samples were harvested for analysis by PPL labs (Redwood City, CA). SSA and its metabolite SA were measured simultaneously using oxopropanoyloxy benzoic acid as an internal standard solution59 (link). To extract SSA/SA from brain, 200 μl of 50% acetonitrile in 0.1% formic acid was added to 30–50 mg of cortical tissue, followed by homogenization and vortexing. After addition of 200 μl of the internal standard solution, the samples were centrifuged and the supernatants were transferred for injection. To measure SSA/SA in the plasma, 10 μl of plasma samples were mixed with 90 μl H2O and 100 μl of Internal Standard Solution, followed by centrifugation and injection. The HPLC was performed in C18 column, following a gradient program (10–90% acetonitrile in 6 min) with a flow rate of 0.4 ml/min. The injection volume is ~ 5 μl. The mass spectrometry analyses were perform on 3200 Q TRAP system (AB SCIEX, Framingham, MA) using MQL algorithm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantification of SSA and Metabolite SA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SSA was administered to C57B6 mice of both males and females via oral garage as a single bolus dose. Mice were sacrificed at predetermined time points and plasma and brain tissue samples were harvested for analysis by PPL labs (Redwood City, CA). SSA and its metabolite SA were measured simultaneously using oxopropanoyloxy benzoic acid as an internal standard solution59 (link). To extract SSA/SA from brain, 200 μl of 50% acetonitrile in 0.1% formic acid was added to 30–50 mg of cortical tissue, followed by homogenization and vortexing. After addition of 200 μl of the internal standard solution, the samples were centrifuged and the supernatants were transferred for injection. To measure SSA/SA in the plasma, 10 μl of plasma samples were mixed with 90 μl H2O and 100 μl of Internal Standard Solution, followed by centrifugation and injection. The HPLC was performed in C18 column, following a gradient program (10–90% acetonitrile in 6 min) with a flow rate of 0.4 ml/min. The injection volume is ~ 5 μl. The mass spectrometry analyses were perform on 3200 Q TRAP system (AB SCIEX, Framingham, MA) using MQL algorithm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

HPLC Characterization of Biomolecular Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Chromatography experiments were performed using an HPLC system (1260 Infinity II, Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Water and acetonitrile (HPLC grade) were purchased from Samchun Pure Chemicals (Pyeongtaek, Republic of Korea), and trifluoroacetic acid of Alfa Aesar (Schiltigheim, France) was used. For the identification of each individual peak appearing in the HPLC chromatogram, authentic compounds (assay ≥ 98%) of adenosine (#A9251), guanosine (#G6752), phenylalanine (#P2126), tryptophan (# T0254), tyrosine (#T3754), and uridine (#U3750) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). The analytical column was a Shim-pack GIS C18 (5 μm, 4.6 × 250 mm, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan), and the mobile phase was a mixture of eluent A (0.1% trifluoroacetic acid in water) and B (0.1% trifluoroacetic acid in acetonitrile). Elution was performed with a linear gradient of eluent A and B under the following conditions: 0→5 min, 0→0% B; 5→75 min, 0→75% B; 75→77 min, 75→95% B; 77→82 min, 95→95% B; 82→84 min, 95→0% B and 84→95 min 0→0% B. The flow rate was 1.0 mL/min, the injection volume was 20 μL, and detection was performed at 210 nm. All samples were filtered with a 0.45 μm syringe filter (PTFE, Advantec, Tokyo, Japan) before injection. To identify peaks from the HPLC results, we conducted MS/MS using the 3200 QTRAP system (AB Sciex, Framingham, MA, USA), as described previously [29 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Toxicological Analysis of Overdose Deaths

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In all 23 autopsy cases, qualitative and quantitative analysis of blood collected from the external iliac vein using liquid chromatography (LC)-tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) determined that death was caused by intoxication due to drug overdose. Every case demonstrated lethal, supra-therapeutic drug levels. LC was performed with a P r o m i n e n c e L C s y s t e m ( S h i m a d z u , K y o t o , J a p a n ) . Chromatographic separation was achieved on a CAPCELL-PAK MG II column (35.0 × 2.0 mm id, 5 lm; Shiseido, Tokyo, Japan). MS/MS detection was performed with a 3200 QTRAP system equipped with an electrospray ionization probe (AB Sciex, Foster City, CA). All analyses were performed by the forensic toxicologist (K.U.) in charge of laboratory sample testing at our institution.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Lipidomic Analysis Using HILIC-MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Lipidomic analysis of these extracted lipids was performed as previously described (Nakao et al., 2019 ; Watanabe et al., 2022 (link)). The extracted lipids were dissolved in equal volumes of methanol and acetonitrile, and subjected to the liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry system consisted of a Prominence UFLC system (Shi-madzu, Kyoto, Japan) equipped with a SeQuant ZIC-HILIC column (5 μm, 2.1 mm × 150 mm, Merck Millipore) coupled to a 3200 QTRAP System (Sciex, Redwood, CA, USA). The optimal conditions for the ionization and fragmentation of each lipid were determined as previously described (Watanabe et al., 2022 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Lipidomic Analysis of Cultured Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were seeded in a 6-cm dish at a density of 0.5 × 106 cells/dish in 5 ml of culture medium. After 24 h, cells were washed twice with PBS and harvested. A total of 1 nmol each of the internal standards C17:0 SM, C17:0 ceramide (Cer), C17:0 lactosylceramide, C17:0 glucosylceramide, C17:0 Gb3, and d18:1-d5-C18:0 GM3 (Avanti Polar Lipids) were then added for LC-MS/MS analysis. The amount of protein was determined and lipids were extracted from the cells. Sphingolipids were analyzed by an LC-MS system that consisted of a Prominence UFLC system (Shimadzu) coupled to a 3200 QTRAP System (SCIEX) as described previously (27 ).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Sphingolipid Quantification by LC-MS/MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were seeded in a 6-cm dish at a density of 0.5 × 106 cells/dish in 5 mL of culture medium. After 24 h, cells were washed twice with PBS and harvested. The amount of protein was determined and lipids were extracted from the cells. A total of 1 nmol each of the internal standards C17:0 SM, C17:0 ceramide (Cer), C17:0 lactosylceramide, C17:0 glucosylceramide, C17:0 Gb3, and d18:1-d5-C18:0 GM3 (Avanti Polar Lipids, Inc) were then added for quantification. Sphingolipids were analyzed by an LC-MS/MS system that consisted of a Prominence UFLC system (Shimadzu Corporation) coupled to a 3200 QTRAP System (SCIEX) as described previously (Nakao et al., 2019 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!