The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Linear trap quadrupole orbitrap velos mass spectrometer

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific

The Linear Trap Quadrupole-ORBITRAP Velos mass spectrometer is a high-performance hybrid mass analyzer. It combines a linear ion trap with an Orbitrap mass analyzer to provide high resolution, accurate mass measurements, and fast data acquisition rates for a wide range of applications.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

5 protocols using linear trap quadrupole orbitrap velos mass spectrometer

1

Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry Proteomics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Analyses were performed using an Ultimate 3000 Rapid Separation liquid chromatographic system (Dionex, The Netherlands) coupled to a hybrid Linear Trap Quadrupole-ORBITRAP Velos mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, San José CA). Peptides were separated on a C18 RP analytical column (3 μm particle size, 100 Å pore size, 75 μm i.d., 50 cm length) with a 240-minute gradient from 99% A (ACN 5%, formic acid 0.1% and H2O 95%) to 40% B (ACN 80%, formic acid 0.085% and H2O 20%). The LTQ-ORBITRAP mass spectrometer acquired data throughout the elution process and operated in a data dependent scheme as follows: full MS scans were acquired with the ORBITRAP, followed by up to 10 LTQ MS/MS CID spectra on most abundant precursors detected in the MS scan, as described in details previously24 (link)31 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantifying Proteome Changes in Stretched Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
3 µg protein extract of stretched and unstretched cells were reduced in 20 mM ammoniumbicarbonate by 2.5 mM dithiothreitol (DTT) for 1 h at 60 °C and with 10 mM iodoacetic acid (IAA) for 30 min at 37 °C. Subsequently the probes were digested by trypsin over night at 37 °C. MS-data were acquired on a linear-trap quadrupole Orbitrap Velos mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific) equipped with a nanoelectrospray ion source. The resulting data were analyzed using the Proteome Discoverer 2.0 software (Thermo Fisher Scientific). SEQUEST-HT and MASCOT search engines were used for the peptide/protein identification. The database searches used the Uniprot Swiss-Prot database (version: October 2015).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Nanoscale Peptide Separation and MS Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Each of the 21 fractions was then re-suspended in 2% acetonitrile/0.1% TFA acid in water and separated by nanoscale C18 reverse-phase liquid chromatography performed on an EASY-nLC II (Thermo Scientific) coupled to a Linear Trap Quadrupole - Orbitrap Velos mass spectrometer (Thermo Scientific). Elution was carried out using a binary gradient with buffer A: 2% acetonitrile and B: 80% acetonitrile, both containing 0.1% of formic acid. Peptides were subsequently eluted at 200 nl/min flow, into a 20 cm fused silica emitter (New Objective) packed in-house with ReproSil-Pur C18-AQ, 1.9 μm resin (Dr Maisch GmbH). Packed emitter was kept at 35°C by means of a column oven integrated into the nanoelectrospray ion source (Sonation). Peptides were eluted at a flow rate of 200 nl/min using 3 different gradients optimised for set of fractions 1-7 (2,20,41% buffer B), 8-15 (5, 25, 46% buffer B) and 16-21 (7, 28, 50% buffer B). Two-step gradients were used, all with 42 minutes for step one and 13 minutes for step two.All gradients were followed by a washing step (100% B) for 10 minutes followed by a 20 minute re-equilibration step (5%), for a total run time of 85 minutes.
Eluting peptides were electrosprayed into the mass spectrometer using a nanoelectrospray ion source (Thermo Scientific). An Active Background Ion Reduction Device was used to decrease air contaminants signal level.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Proteomic Profiling of Trophoblastic Extracellular Vesicles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A minimum of 5 µg of purified trophoblastic EVs, derived from
the medium of trophoblasts obtained from 2–3 placentas, were solubilized
in 0.01% n-dodecyl β-D-maltoside at 4°C overnight. The
samples were then processed by the Biomedical Mass Spectrometry Center at the
University of Pittsburgh. In-solution tryptic digestion was performed at
37°C overnight with trypsin gold (mass spectrometry grade, Promega,
Madison, WI). Digested peptides were analyzed by nano reverse-phase
high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) interfaced with a linear trap
quadrupole-orbitrap Velos mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher). The tandem mass
spectra (MS/MS) were analyzed by the MASCOT search engine (Matrix Science), and
identified peptides and proteins were further statistically validated with the
Scaffold software. The free Scaffold viewer was downloaded to display a list of
identified proteins. High confidence identifications were proteins with (a)
protein identification probability of 99% or above, (b) peptide
identification probability of 95% or above, and (c) the presence of at
least two peptides.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Nanoscale LC-MS/MS Peptide Separation and Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The tryptic digest obtained was separated by nanoscale C18 reverse‐phase liquid chromatography performed on an EASY‐nLC II (Thermo Scientific) coupled to a Linear Trap Quadrupole—Orbitrap Velos mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher). Elution was carried out using a binary gradient with buffer A: 2% acetonitrile and B: 80% acetonitrile, both containing 0.1% of formic acid. Samples were resuspended and loaded with buffer A, on a precolumn NS‐MP‐10 BioSphere C18 5 μm 120 Å– 360/100 μm × 0.2cm of length (NanoSeparations), and washed with 25 µL of buffer A at a maximum pressure of 200 bar. Desalted peptides were subsequently eluted at 200 nL·min−1 flow, into a 20 cm fused silica emitter (New Objective) packed in‐house with ReproSil Gold 200 C18, 3 μm resin (Dr. Maisch GmbH, Ammerbuch, Germany). The gradient used started at 5% of buffer B and was increased to 28% over 42 min and then to 45% over 13 min. Finally, a washing step at 100% of B was carried out over 10 min followed by a 5‐min re‐equilibration at 5% B for a total duration of 70 min. The eluting peptide solutions were automatically (online) electrosprayed into the mass spectrometer via a nanoelectrospray ion source. An Active Background Ion Reduction Device (ABIRD) was used to decrease the contaminant signal level.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!