The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Su 70 field emission scanning electron microscope

Manufactured by Hitachi
Sourced in Japan

The Hitachi SU-70 field emission scanning electron microscope is a high-performance instrument designed for advanced materials analysis. It features a field emission electron source that provides high-resolution imaging capabilities. The SU-70 is capable of producing detailed, high-quality images of a wide range of samples, making it a valuable tool for research and industrial applications.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

11 protocols using su 70 field emission scanning electron microscope

1

Innovative Steel Coated with Polymeric Layers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The material was provided by ArcelorMittal (Chicago, IL, USA). The innovative steel coated with two polymer layers on both the punch and die sides is illustrated in Figure 2.
The two layers are the tie layer, which is the layer that bonds the steel substrate to the top layer, externally, with a standard total thickness within the 12.5–35 μ m range. Top layers provide mechanical strength and tie layers are intended for adhesion and anticorrosion properties. To precisely measure polymer layers, Wagner’s dis-indentation method can be used [9 (link)]. These polymeric layers can be adapted to any conditions and are made of PET which is more resistant than lacquer as a product barrier, bottom protection and wall denting. It also offers new decoration possibilities (white, clear or pigmented polymer).
ArcelorMittal manufactures this new material by a compact and evolutive process using PET as a starting point instead of laminated film. The layer coatings of both sides are produced at the same time (Figure 3).
A Hitachi SU-70 field emission scanning electron microscope (Japan) captured a SEM image of part of the material. The real thicknesses of both the top and tie polymeric layers is observed in Figure 4.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Comprehensive Characterization of Advanced Materials

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Electrochemical testing was performed by using a CHI 660E electrochemical workstation (Chenhua, China). SEM images were obtained on a SU-70 field emission scanning electron microscope (Hitachi, Japan). The Raman spectra were measured on an XPLORA Raman spectrometer (Hitachi, Japan) using a 532 nm laser. The X-ray diffraction pattern (XRD) was measured on a D8 X-ray diffraction system (Bruker, USA) with a Cu Kα. The conductivity test was conducted on a four-probe analyzer (Guangzhou Four-Probe Electronics, China). The mechanical properties test was carried out on a 5948 universal testing machine (Instron, USA). The tensile test rate was 0.2 mm s−1, and the test sample was 1 cm × 3 cm × 2 mm in size. The compression test rate was 0.2 mm s−1, and the sample was a cylinder with a diameter of 2 cm, and a height of 1.5 cm. The rheological test was performed on an MCR 302 rheometer (Anton Paar, Austria) with a parallel plate rotor (25 mm) and the gap was set to be 1 mm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Scanning Electron Microscopy of Trypanosomes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis was performed as described previously (20 (link)). Briefly, trypanosomes were fixed at 4°C in HMI9 growth medium containing 2.5% glutaraldehyde for 30 min and then captured on 0.2-μm-pore-size polycarbonate filters. The filter was washed, dehydrated, and carbon coated in a high-vacuum evaporator. Filters were inspected using a Hitachi SU70 field emission scanning electron microscope operated at 2.0 keV.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Microstructural Analysis of Beads

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The microstructural features of the beads and their compositions were examined using the Hitachi SU-70 Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscope (FE-SEM) with Oxford Energy-dispersive X-ray Spectrometer (EDX) (Hitachi, Buckinghamshire, UK). Before examination, each bead was cross-sectioned and covered with a thin platinum layer. The working parameters for FE-SEM-EDX were: 20 kV accelerating voltage, working distance between 16.8 and 17.6 mm, 30° elevation and 20 keV energy level.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Scanning Electron Microscope Imaging Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were prepared for imaging by a Hitachi SU-70 Field Emission scanning electron microscope and a Hitachi S-4700 Field Emission scanning electron microscope (Hitachi, Gaithersburg, MD) as previously reported [10 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Characterization of Soot Particles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The soot specimens were characterized through scanning electron microscopy (SEM), energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS), zeta potential and wettability analyses. High-resolution SEM images were taken with a Hitachi SU-70 field emission scanning electron microscope at magnifications of 50 kX. The chemical composition of the soot was defined via EDS measurements performed at 15 keV with an EDAX detector having an active area of 10 mm2. A plastic cuvette filled with 1.5 mL distilled water and 0.1 mg soot powder was subjected to dynamic light scattering and electrophoretic light scattering, using a Zetasizer Nano ZS Ver. 7.12 (Malvern Panalytical, UK) analytical instrument, in order to quantify the particle size and surface charge. An optical system OCA 15EC (DataPhysics, Germany) was used to determine the static contact angle (SCA) and contact angle hysteresis (CAH) on the soot as average of three independent experimental cycles with 10 μL distilled water droplets.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Comprehensive Characterization of Materials

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
X-ray diffraction (XRD) spectra were recorded on a D8 Advance diffractometer equipped with a Lynxeye Xe detector (Bruker AXS, Karlsruhe, Germany). X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) was measured with a thermal K-α instrument, the X-ray emission source is Al-K-α rays (hν ≈ 1486.6 eV), and the experimental binding energy data are corrected to C 1 s = 284.8 eV. The scanning electron microscope (SEM) images of the prepared material were detected on an SU-70 field emission scanning electron microscope (SU-70, Hitachi, Japan) under an accelerating voltage of 5 kV. For the transmission electron microscopy (TEM), high-resolution TEM images were obtained using the transmission electron microscope (Tecnai G2F20S-Twin, FEI, Hillsboro, OR, USA) under an accelerating voltage of 200 kV. UV–vis spectra were recorded on the spectrometer (TU1901, P-General, Samutprakarn, Thailand). The SERS performance was examined using a ProSp-Micro40-VIS Raman system (Hangzhou SPL, Hangzhou, China), and QE Pro spectrometer (QE pro, Ocean Optics, Dunedin, FL, USA) was used to record the Raman spectra. The excitation laser wavelength was 532 nm and the power on the substrate was 1 mW. Meanwhile, the integration time was set to 10 s, and the objective lens was 50×.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

SEM Analysis of Cell Cultures

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cultures for SEM analysis were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde with 2.5% glutaraldehyde. Microfluidic chambers were removed, and the cultures were dehydrated in an ethanol gradient and stored in acetone. Coverslips were critical-point dried, sputter coated with platinum and examined using a Hitachi SU-70 field emission scanning electron microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

SEM Imaging of Cells in Microdevices

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The microdevices containing NHLFs with or without macrophages were fixed using a solution of 2% glutaraldehyde (Acros Organics) in PBS (containing Ca2+/Mg2+) for 1 hour at 4°C. Next, the samples were dehydrated with ethanol in increments of 10% from 50 to 100% for 10 min each, followed by critical point drying for 1 hour using hexamethyldisilazane (Alfa Aesar) in a chemical hood. The scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was performed using the Hitachi SU70 Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Characterization of Composite Materials

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The morphology of the composites was observed using a SU-70 field emission scanning electron microscope (Hitachi, Japan) operated at 10 kV. Tensile tests were performed on an AGS-X electronic universal testing machine (Shimadzu, Japan) with a speed of 10 mm min−1 and the typical specimen dimension of 80 mm × 10 mm × 4 mm. The bending performance of the material was tested with the AGS-X electronic universal testing machine with a specimen size of 20 mm × 6 mm × 2 mm. Fourier transform infrared spectra were obtained on an iS10 spectrometer (Thermo Fisher, USA). Thermogravimetric analysis under nitrogen atmosphere was carried out on an STA 409EP Simultaneous Thermal Analyzer (Netzsch, Germany) from 30 °C to 800 °C at a heating rate of 10 °C min−1. DSC data were collected on a 204 F1 differential scanning colorimetry (Netzsch, Germany) from 25 °C to 350 °C at a heating rate of 10 °C min−1 under nitrogen atmosphere. Dynamic thermomechanical analysis was conducted with a 242E Analyzer (Netzsch, Germany) from 25 °C to 250 °C with a heating rate of 3 °C min−1. The tests were performed in the double cantilever beam mode with a sample size of 60 mm × 10 mm × 4 mm, a frequency of 1.0 Hz and an amplitude of 5 μm. Gas adsorption tests were carried out on a ASAP 2460 2.02 (MicroActive, USA). The degassing temperature was 350 °C, and the degassing time was 8 h.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!