The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Dm irb microscope system

Manufactured by Leica camera
Sourced in Germany

The Leica DM-IRB is a versatile inverted research microscope system designed for a wide range of applications in life science laboratories. It features a stable and ergonomic design, providing a stable platform for precise and reliable observations. The DM-IRB is equipped with various illumination options and can accommodate a variety of objectives to accommodate the specific needs of the user's research.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

6 protocols using dm irb microscope system

1

Wound Healing Assay with MDA-MB 231 Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MDA-MB 231 cells were plated into 24-well plates (105 cells/well) in complete medium. Confluent monolayers were nutrient starved by growing them for 24 h in medium containing 0.5% FBS and then scratched using a 200 μl pipette tip. After washing, cells were treated or not with 10 ng/ml of refp17 or vp17s in complete medium (10% FBS). When reported, starved MDA-MB 231 cells were pretreated with 2.5 μg/ml of mAb to CXCR1 (mAb 330; R&D, Minneapolis, MN, USA) or to CXCR2 (mAb 331; R&D), or with an isotype-matched mAb (2.5 μg/ml; R&D) for 1 h at 37 °C before proteins stimulation. In some experiments, MDA-MB 231 cells were serum starved for 24 h in the presence or absence of inhibitors of PI3K/Akt (LY294002) (20 μM) (ENZO Life Sciences, Farmingdale, NY, USA), Jak/STAT (AG-490) (20 μM) (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) or MEK/ERK1/2 (PD98059) (10 μM) (Calbiochem, Billerica, MA, USA) signaling pathways. Cell migration was evaluated at different time points using an inverted microscope (DM-IRB microscope system, Leica, Buffalo Grove, IL, USA). Cells were photographed using a CCD camera (Hitachi Inc., Krefeld, Germany). Wound closure was monitored over 12 h. In some experiments, in order to count the cells migrating into the wound area or protruding from the border of the wound, cells were fixed before wound closure and stained with Comassie brilliant blue.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Microfluidic Characterization of Cell Deformation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Microchannels were fabricated using standard techniques of soft photolithography in polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS). All channels were 100 μm(w) × 22 µm(h) containing a single 100(lc) × 20(wc) µm constriction. Cells were centrifuged at 300 g for 1 minute at room temperature, resuspended in PB2, and diluted in physiological salt solution (PSS, 4.7 mM KCl, 2.0 mMCaCl2, 1.2 mM MgSO4, 140.5 mM NaCl, 21 mM Tris, 11.1 mM dextrose, pH7.4) containing 0.1% BSA. High-speed videos were acquired at ~1900 frames/sec with a 30μs exposure with a Phantom Miro M120 camera (Vision Research) on a DMIRB microscope system (Leica) with a 63 × / oil immersion objective. Movies were analyzed using ImageJ41 . At least three independent experiments were performed and more than 30 cells were analyzed at each gestational age.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Assessing Progenitor Cell Migration in Collagen

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A total of 25,000 PCs were detached from the flasks and resuspended in a mixture of collagen I, 1X DMEM/F-12 medium, and 1X sodium bicarbonate solution. Gel drops were then created in a 4-well plate (Nunc., Thermofisher Scientific) and incubated at 37 °C for 1 h. After incubation, cell-loaded collagen drops were bathed in a medium containing FGF-2 (50 ng/mL) (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) or VEGF-A (50 ng/mL) (Miltenyi Biotec). Collagen drops bathed in EBM-2 media with 0.5% serum or EGM-2 media with 10% FBS were used as a negative and positive control, respectively. PCs migration outside collagen drops was quantified as the distance covered at least after 72 h obtained with a DM-IRB microscope system (Leica, Wetzlar, Germany) and photographed with a Hitachi KP-D50 camera. The distance was measured manually as a parameter of length from the edge of the collagen drops to the leading edge of the cells.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Evaluating HUVEC Migration in Response to Viral Protein Variants

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The Culture-Insert 2 Well (Ibidi GmbH) was used to perform the assay. In the first well, HUVEC cells were plated (1 × 105 cells/well) in EGM containing 10% FBS, and confluent cell monolayers were starved for 24 h by replacing medium with endothelial basal medium containing 0.5% FBS. In the second well, HeLa cells (1 × 105 cells/well) were plated after nucleofection with Gag plasmid expressing refp17, NHL-a101, or NHL-a102. Twenty-four hours later, the Culture-Insert 2 Well were gently removed with sterile tweezers creating a physical gap within the two cell monolayers. Cell layers were washed with PBS to remove cell debris and not attached cells. The μDish was filled with cell medium (EGM supplemented with 10% FBS) applying the recommended volume of 2 ml. HUVEC migration in response to refp17 or variant proteins secreted by nucleofected HeLa cells was evaluated at different time points using an inverted microscope (DM-IRB microscope system; Leica). HUVECs migrating into the wounded area, or protruding from the border of the wound, were photographed using a charge-coupled device camera (Hitachi, Inc) connected to a computer. The areas of the wound were calculated by using the ImageJ software (National Institutes of Health).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

HUVEC Migration Assay with Jurkat Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HUVECs were plated into 24-well plates (1 × 105cells/well) in EGM containing 10% FCS and confluent monolayers were starved for 24 h by replacing medium with EGM containing 0,5% FCS. HUVECs were then co-cultured with Jurkat cells previously nucleofected or not with AG49CMVGag-RTEm26CTE (Jurkat-Gag) and pEGFPN3 (Jurkat-EGFP). After 24 h of culture, Jurkat cells were removed and HUVEC monolayers were scratched using a 200 μL pipette tip. In some experiments starved HUVEC monolayers were scratched, washed with warm PBS and cultured in EGM containing 10% FCS in the presence or absence of synthetic p17s at different concentrations. HUVEC migration was evaluated at different time points using an inverted microscope (DM-IRB microscope system, Leica, Milan Italy). HUVECs migrating into the wounded area, or protruding from the border of the wound, were photographed using a CCD camera (Hitachi Inc., Krefeld, Germany) connected to a computer via a frame grabber (Matrox Meteor). Analysis of the images were performed using the QWin-lite software (Leica).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Wound Healing Assay: Monitoring EC Migration

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The wound healing assay was performed following previously described procedures with minor modifications [14 (link)]. Cells (1 × 105) were plated into collagen-coated 24-well plates overnight. Twenty-four hours later, the monolayer was scratched using a 200 μL pipette tip and cultured in complete medium. The percentage of wound healing was evaluated during a period of 8–10 h. ECs migration was recorded using a DM-IRB microscope system (Leica, Wetzlar, Germany), equipped with a Charge Coupled Device (CCD) camera (Hitachi Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) and connected to a computer via a frame grabber (Matrox Meteor). Analysis of the images was performed using the QWin-lite software (Leica). In some experiments, confluent EC monolayers were pretreated, before scratching, with conditioned medium from Mock- or ARV p17-nucleofected cells for 16 h. In other experiments, EC monolayers were scratched and then cultured in the presence of 10 μM Diprotin A (DPA; Abcam, Cambridge, UK).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!