The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

516 protocols using spss software for window

1

Statistical Analysis of Dermo-Fatty Tissue Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SPSS software for Windows (version 26.0; IBM Corporation, Armonk, New York, USA) was used for statistical analysis. Data were defined as the frequency and percentage for categorical variables, the mean and standard deviation for numerical variables. Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used for normality analysis. When the number of dependent groups was more than two, the repeated-measures ANOVA test and the Friedman test were used for analysis. Paired t test and Wilcoxon rank-sum test were used to compare the two dependent groups. The relationship between the excised dermo fatty tissue and data differences was evaluated using Pearson's correlation test and Spearman’s rho test. The statistical significance level was accepted as p <0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Intestinal Infections Prevalence Study

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data were entered, checked for accuracy, and then analyzed descriptively (frequencies and percentages) using IBM SPSS software for Windows (Version 21.0).
Every individual with at least one positive test was considered positive for intestinal infections. The epidemiological of enteropathogenic bacterial and intestinal parasitic infections were reported on the percentage of prevalence and type of organism. Demographic data and personal hygienic status were analyzed and presented as frequencies.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Statistical Analysis of Research Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All the data were analyzed with SPSS software for Windows (v21.0; IBM, Armonk, NY, USA). Individual and aggregate data were summarized using descriptive statistics including mean, standart deviations, medians (minimum-maximum), frequency distributions and percentages. Normality of data distribution was verified by Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Comparison of the variables with normal distribution was made with Student t-test. Evaluation of categorical variables was performed by chi-square test. The kappa statistic was calculated to evaluate the agreement. P values of <0.05 were considered statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Standardized Behavioral Analysis in Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Results of CORT treated mice were normalized against the mean of their respective control group. All data were tested for normality using Kolmogorov-Smirnov test prior to further statistical evaluation. All behavioral experiments, except SI, were analyzed using unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-test or corrected with Welch’s t-test, where appropriate. Bodyweight measurements and SI were evaluated using repeated measure one-way ANOVA with posthoc pairwise comparison.
Statistical outliers (values outside of the interval: mean ± 2 standard deviations, which covers >95% of a normal distribution) were excluded from further analysis.
All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software, for windows, Version 24 (IBM Corporation, Chicago, IL, USA) and Graphpad Prism, Version 7 (San Diego, CA, USA). A summary of all statistical results is provided in Table S1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Long Working Hours and Mental Health

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The WHO-5 scores were calculated according to the established scoring algorithms, with higher scores indicating better mental well-being, contrary to the depression scores of the PHQ-9. Sociodemographic variables were categorized for analysis purposes as shown in Table 1. We first investigated the prevalence of depression and PMWB across different characteristics among participants by using Pearson’s χ2 test. Then the associations between long working hours and psychological outcomes (depression and PMWB) were assessed via multivariate logistic regression. The logistic regression models were fitted using the categories of scale scores as the dependent variables and weekly working hours as the independent variable. The odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Finally, we assessed the impact of having hobbies on the mean score changes of the PHQ-9 and WHO-5 scales in the four WWH groups using a general linear model and simultaneously explored whether there was an interaction effect between working hours and having hobbies. A two-tailed alpha with p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. All the data analyses were performed using SPSS software for Windows, version 22.0 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SPSS software for Windows (ver. 19; IBM, USA) was used for statistical analysis of the data. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to examine differences between samplings. Tukey's test was used to compare group data. Differences were considered significant if the p value was less than 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Guided Bone Regeneration Outcomes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Categorical data were reported as number (n) and percentage (%) and tested for differences using the chi-square test. Numerical data were described as mean ± standard deviation (SD). To explore normality, the Shapiro–Wilk test was used. For normally distributed data, inter-group comparisons took place using an independent t-test while intra-group comparisons between different time points were done using repeated-measure ANOVA with Bonferroni adjustment. For non-normally distributed data, the Mann–Whitney test was used for inter-group comparisons and the Friedman test for intra-group comparisons. A stepwise linear regression model was constructed for primary outcome (CAL-gain after 9 months) as the dependent variable, while study group, age, tooth distribution, number of defect walls, baseline radiographic angle, FMBS, and FMBS at baseline and 9 months as well as radiographic bone fill at 9 months were the independent variables. All comparisons were two-tailed and p < 0.05 was described as statistically significant. Analyses were conducted using the SPSS software for Windows (version 26, IBM, NY, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Postoperative Analgesia Regimen Comparison

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The chi-square test was used to compare preoperative categorical variables (gender, side of the affected knee) among the 3 analgesia groups, and 1-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare preoperative quantitative variables. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare postoperative total morphine consumption among the groups, as that did not have a normal distribution. Repeated-measures ANOVA was used to compare all other postoperative quantitative variables; when the result was significant, the Sidak test was used to perform pairwise comparisons between groups.
The Benjamini-Hochberg false-discovery-rate correction was performed to adjust the p value for multiple comparisons12 , using R (R Foundation for Statistical Computing). All other analyses were performed using SPSS software for Windows (version 25; IBM). All analyses were 2-sided, and significance was set at p < 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Predictive Nomogram for Intraoperative Adverse Events

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Quantitative data was described as mean ±SD or median (25th–75th); qualitative data was described as n (%). The comparisons between groups for qualitative variables were performed by Chi-square test or Fisher exact test and comparisons between groups for quantitative variables was performed using a t-test or Wilcoxon test. The likelihood ratio test with backward step-down selection was used for the multivariate logistic analysis. The VIFs and Tolerance value were calculated using the “car” package. The ROC curves were plotted using the “pROC” package. Nomogram construction and calibration plots were performed using the “rms” package. A two-sided P value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. The cut-off probability threshold of the nomogram for the prediction of IAC was determined by maximizing the Youden index. The statistical analysis was conducted using R statistical software (version 3.3.1) and SPSS software for Windows, version 20.0 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All data were analyzed using the IBM SPSS software for Windows (version 23.0; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Continuous variables were summarized as the means ± standard deviations if they were normally distributed. Ranked data were expressed as the medians and ranges. The differences between groups were analyzed using the independent samples t test for continuous variables, the Mann-Whitney U test for ranked variables, and Fisher’s exact test or the Chi-square test for categorical variables. P values less than 0.05 (2-tailed) were considered significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!