The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

52 protocols using cometassay

1

Comet Assay for DNA Damage Assessment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The comet assay (Trevigen, Gaithersburg, MD) was performed as described previously [44 (link)]. Briefly, T98G cells were treated, trypsinized and washed with ice-cold PBS. Next, the cells at 1 × 105/ml were embedded in LMAgarose and immediately pipetted 100 μL onto CometSlide. After cooling, submerse the slides flat in pre-cooled lysis buffer and freshly prepared Alkaline Unwinding Solution, pH > 13. Electrophoresis was carried out at 25 V, 300 mA. The slides were washed in neutralization buffer (0.4 M Tris-HCl, pH 7.5) for three times and in 70% ethanol. Subsequently, the DNA was stained with SYBR Green I dye (Sangon Biotech, 1:10,000 in Tris-EDTA buffer, pH 7.5) and images were captured using a fluorescence microscope (Nikon, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Comet Assay for DNA Damage Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Comet Assay (single-cell gel electrophoresis) was performed according to the manufacturer's instructions (Trevigen). In brief, CGNPs from DicerCtrl and DicerER-Cre were cultured in the presence of 2 μM 4-OH Tamoxifen for 24–48 hr. The cells were scraped and washed once with ice-cold 1 × PBS (Gibco). Cells were resuspended at 105 cells/ml in PBS and mixed with molten LMAgarose (at 37°C) at a ratio of 1:10. 50 μl of the mixture was immediately pipetted onto the CometSlide. The slide was immersed first in lysis solution and then in alkaline unwinding solution. The electrophoresis was performed using the alkaline electrophoresis solution at 21 V for 30 min. The slides were dried and immersed in SYBR Gold solution and were visualized on a DMIRE2 inverted fluorescence microscope (Leica). The experiments were done at least in triplicate.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Evaluating DNA Damage by Comet Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A549 cells (0.2×106/well) seeded in six-well plates were treated with GNR-Dox-NP and GNR-Dox-Tf-NP. At 24 h after treatment, the cells were harvested, processed, and subjected to Comet Assay (Trevigen, Gaithersburg, MD, USA) as previously described.27 (link) The Olive tail moment was determined by screening 10 cells per field for a total of 5 fields (50 cells in total) in each sample.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Comet Assay for DNA Damage Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DU145 and PC3 cells were transfected with 20 nM of control or radiation sensitizing miRNAs and then treated with 4 Gy of IR 48 h post transfection. At 4 h after IR, the CometAssay® from Trevigen (Gaithersburg, MD, USA) was performed according to manufacturer instructions. Briefly, cells were mixed with low melting point agarose and plated on microscope slides and allowed to gel. Cells were then lysed under neutral buffer followed by rinse in TBE buffer (10.8% [w/v] tris base, 5.5% [w/v] boric acid, 0.93% [w/v] EDTA). After electrophoresis in TBE buffer for 40 min at 1 V/cm, slides were washed in water and dehydrated with ethanol, air dried overnight and then treated with SYBR Green for DNA staining. Comets were imaged by Imager.Z1 fluorescent microscopy (Carl Zeiss AG, Oberkochen, Germany) and analyzed using CometScore. The tail moment was calculated as the average of at least 50 comets.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Comet Assay for Larval Fatbodies

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Larval fatbodies were dissected in PBS, and incubated 10 min in 500 μl of Accumax cell detachment solution at RT (SCR0006, Millipore). Cells were centrifuged 20 min at 2000 rpm to remove Accumax and resuspended in 10 μl PBS. Cells were homogenized in 100 μl of low melting agarose; two replicates of 50 μl gels were prepared on each slide and processed in neutral electrophoresis buffer following manufacturer’s instructions (Trevigen Comet Assay). Comet length quantifications were done in a minimum of n=40 cells/ genotype.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Doxycycline-Induced DNA Damage Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
H1299-IL24 cells (0.2 × 106/well) seeded in six-well plates were treated with or without doxycycline (1 µg/mL). The cells were harvested at 48 h and 72 h after treatment and subjected to Comet assay (Trevigen, Gaithersburg, MD, USA) [59 (link)]. The Olive tail moment was determined by screening 10 cells per field for five fields (50 cells in total) in each sample.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

JUUL Pod-Induced DNA Damage Assessment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Twenty four hours after monocytes (U937) being treated with JUUL pods and similar pod flavors, the cells were prepared for DNA damage assessment by Comet assay according to the manufacturer’s protocol (Trevigen, MD). Briefly, the alkaline procedure was followed and approximately 5000 cells per sample were used and stained with SYBR gold 1:10,000. EVOS imaging system was used to capture the fluorescence images. The images were inverted for the Opencomet analysis. The olive tail moment was obtained using Opencomet software for the representative images, and the percent change was calculated in comparison to the control group.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Single Cell DNA Damage Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Assessment of DNA damage and double strand break formation in cells was performed using the single cell gel electrophoresis assay, CometAssay (Trevigen). Cells were harvested and resuspended in low-melting point agarose, plated onto provided glass slides, lysed, and subjected to electrophoresis in neutral electrophoresis buffer (100 mM Tris, 300 mM Na Acetate, pH 9.0). Slides were processed according to manufacturer’s instructions and stained with SYBR Gold. After staining, coverslips were mounted onto slides with approximately 1 drop of ProLong Gold (Thermo Fisher) and cured overnight at room temperature protected from light. DNA tails were visualized using a Nikon Eclipse 80i fluorescence microscope and quantified using ImageJ software with the OpenComet plugin (URL: http://www.opencomet.org).34
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

DNA Damage Detection via Comet Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA Comet Assay was used to detect DNA-Double Strand Breaks following the instructions from Comet Assay® (Trevigen, MD USA) protocols.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Comet Assay for DNA Damage Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
U2OS cells were seeded in 6-well plates at a density of 1 × 104 cells per well and treated with 500 μM DFMO for 72 h. Cells were washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) twice and incubated with 125 nM olaparib for 24 h or irradiated with a 10 Gy ionizing radiation. Cells were then cultured with fresh medium containing 500 μM DFMO for the indicated recovery time. Comet assay (Trevigen) under alkaline condition was conducted according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, cells were mixed with low-melting temperature agarose and spread onto slides. Slides were immersed in lysis buffer and then in unwinding solution for 1 h at 4 °C. Slides were then subjected to electrophoresis at 21 volts for 1 h at 4 °C, followed by staining with SafeView Plus dye (Applied Biological Materials) at room temperature for 40 min. Fifty randomly selected cells per sample were captured using a Leica DM6000B upright microscope system. The tail moment was computed as the percentage of DNA in the comet tail multiplied by the tail length in the individual nuclei using the CometScore software (TriTek).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!