The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

4 protocols using mosaix

1

Fluorescence Imaging and Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Imaging was performed using an Axio Observer Z1 equipped with an Axiocam ICc1 (for brightfield) and an Axiocam MRm camera (for fluorescence). All images were acquired with a 10× (0.25 NA) Fluar objective. Images were stitched together for analyses and display using Zeiss MosaiX. Image analyses were performed using ImageJ.31 (link) For area-based normalization, gaps or holes in the gel or tissue areas were omitted from the total area calculations.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantification of Neovascularization in Vldlr-/- Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Neovascularization analysis in the Vldlr−/− mice was performed as described (Stahl et al., 2009 (link), Sun et al., 2015 (link)). The whole mounts of retinas from Vldlr−/− and wild type were stained with isolectin IB4 and imaged using Zeiss AxioObserver.Z1 microscope with a monochrome digital Zeiss camera AxioCam MRm focusing on the terminal end of lesions on the RPE layer (usually at P16), and individual images were merged to create one whole retinal image using automated merge function (mosaiX; Zeiss) in the software AxioVision 4.6.3.0 (Zeiss). ImageJ (National Institutes of Health, http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/) was used for quantification of subretinal neovascularization lesion number and area in Vldlr−/− retinas with designed plugins adapted from the method used to measure retinal neovascularization (SWIFT_NV) in the OIR model (Stahl et al., 2009 (link)) which use a user-designated threshold to mark lesion structures that clearly stand out from background fluorescence of normal vessels, and can automatically remove small artifacts by selecting objects with a minimum size of 100 pixels. Other larger artifacts such as occasional cellular debris or retinal periphery with hyperfluorescence can be manually excluded from quantification. Lesion numbers and areas were quantified with researchers masked to the identity of samples.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Dissecting and Imaging Drosophila Intestine

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For live imaging, guts were dissected in 1× PBS and immediately mounted in the antifading agent Citifluor AF1 (Citifluor Ltd.). For immunofluorescence, guts were dissected in PBS, fixed for 20 min in 0.1% Tween 20-PBS (PBT) with 4% paraformaldehyde, rinsed in PBT, and then incubated with primary antibodies (1:500 anti-PH3 [Millipore], 1:500 anti-Prospero [DSHB], and 1:1,000 anti-GFP [Roche]) in PBT plus 1% bovine serum albumin. Primary antibodies were revealed with Alexa 488 or Alexa 594-coupled anti-mouse antibodies (Invitrogen), and nuclei were stained with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) (Sigma). Guts were then scanned with an Axioplot imager (Zeiss) and recomposed using the software program MosaiX (Zeiss).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Histological Verification of Visual Cortex Recordings

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
At the end of experiments, the rats were anesthetized with pentobarbital (50 mg/kg) and perfused intracardially with 0.9% saline and 4% formaldehyde. The brains were stored in formaldehyde and placed in a 30% sucrose solution for 72 h before sectioning by a cryostat. Coronal sections (40 µm) were cut, mounted on glass slides, and stained for Nissl bodies with cresyl violet (Sigma-Aldrich). The tetrode tracks were measured and imaged with a light microscope (Axioplan microscope, Axiocam HRZ camera, AxioVision software and MosaiX, Zeiss). All electrode traces were verified to be localized within the visual cortex, based on cytoarchitectonic criteria. The recording location was extrapolated from deepest trace identified by histologic inspection of the sections and the tetrode-turning log. Shrinkage of the tissue was adjusted for.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!