The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

9 protocols using na3vo4

1

Crystallizing GFP-dynein-2 in Pre-powerstroke State

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Peak fractions of GFP-dynein-2D1091-Q4307 after SEC were pooled and concentrated to 8 mg/ml. In order to lock dynein in its pre-powerstroke state, Mg.ATP (Sigma Aldrich) and Na3VO4 (New England Biolabs) were added to a final concentration of 3 mM each. Crystals were obtained by hanging drop vapour diffusion at 19 °C mixing equal volumes of protein with reservoir solution (4-6 % PEG 6000 and 0.1 M Tris pH 8.0). Crystallization strictly depended on the presence of both Mg.ATP and Na3VO4. Crystals did not form under apo, Mg.ATP or Na3VO4 conditions. The crystal quality was markedly improved by microseeding. Seeds were prepared by harvesting GFP-dynein-2D1091-Q4307 crystals into 100 μl of reservoir solution followed by vortexing with a seed bead (Jena Bioscience) for 30 s. After diluting the seed stock 1:10000, crystallization was carried out by mixing equal volumes of protein and seeds in reservoir solution, followed by equilibration against reservoir as described above.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Western Blot Analysis of Protein Extracts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All chemicals were purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, MO, USA) unless noted otherwise. Cells were lysed in RIPA buffer (20 mM Tris, pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 1% NP-40, 10% glycerol, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM EGTA, 5 mM NaPPi, 50 mM NaF, 10 mM Na β-glycerophosphate) plus fresh HALT protease inhibitor cocktail (Pierce; Rockford, IL, USA) and 1 mM Na3VO4 (New England Biolabs; Ipswich, MA, USA). Lysates were sonicated for 15 s and centrifuged at 17 000 × g for 10 min at 4°C. Protein content in supernatant was quantified by BCA assay (Pierce). Protein extracts were reduced and denatured using NuPAGE (ThermoFisher Scientific) plus 1.25% β-mercaptoethanol. SDS-PAGE-separated proteins were transferred to nitrocellulose, and membranes were stained with Ponceau S to visually confirm even protein loading. Blots were probed with antibodies against ER (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX, USA; cat.# sc-8002), vinculin, β-actin (Cell Signaling Technology; Danvers, MA, USA; cat.# 13901), and FLAG (Millipore Sigma; Burlington, MA, USA; cat.# F3165). Signal was detected using horseradish-peroxidase labeled secondary antibodies (GE Healthcare; Waukesha, WI, USA) and ECL substrates (Pierce).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Immunoblot Analysis of Signaling Pathways

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were lysed, and frozen tumors were homogenized and lysed in RIPA buffer (20 mM Tris, pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 1% NP-40, 10% glycerol, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM EGTA, 5 mM NaPPi, 50 mM NaF, 10 mM Na β-glycerophosphate, plus fresh Halt protease inhibitor cocktail; Pierce; and 1 mM Na3VO4; New England Biolabs). Lysates were sonicated for 15 s and centrifuged at 17,000 g for 10 min at 4°C, and protein in supernatants was quantified using BCA assay (Pierce). Lysates were denatured with NuPage (Life Technologies) and reduced with 1.25% β-mercaptoethanol (Sigma). Proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE and transferred to nitrocellulose. Even protein loading across lanes was visually confirmed with Ponceau S staining. Blots were probed with antibodies against P-AKTS473, P-AKTT308, P-p70S6KT389, P-S6S240/244, P-ERK1/2T202/Y204, P-MEK1/2S217/221, Cyclin D1, Bim, Bcl-2, Bcl-xL, Mcl-1, PUMA, P-Stat3Y705, actin, vinculin (Cell Signaling), ER, Cyclin A, Cyclin B1, Bad, Bax (Santa Cruz), Bak (Upstate), and PR (Dako). Antibodies against Cyclin A, Cyclin B1, Bad, Bax, and Bak were provided by A. Eastman (Geisel School of Medicine, Lebanon, NH). HRP-labeled secondary antibodies (GE Healthcare) and ECL or ELISA Pico substrate (Thermo Scientific) were used for signal detection.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

HUVEC Cell Lysis and Western Blotting

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HUVEC cultures were lysed using RIPA buffer (Boston Bioproducts) supplemented with cOmplete Protease Inhibitor Cocktail (Roche) and PhosStop Phosphatase Inhibitor Cocktail (Roche), 1 mM Na3VO4 (New England Biolabs), and 1 mM NaF. Proteins were resolved via SDS-PAGE 4%–12% gradient gels (Thermo Fisher Scientific) under reducing conditions using NuPAGE SDS sample buffer and sample reducing agent (Thermo Fisher Scientific), transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane, and blocked with SuperBlock buffer (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Protein detection was performed with the following primary antibodies: TMEM16E/Ano5 (clone N421A/85, UC Davis/NIH NeuroMab), V5-Tag (80076, Cell Signaling Technology), TMEM16F (MilliporeSigma), TFPI (AF2974, R&D Systems), β-actin, and GAPDH (12620 and 2118, respectively, Cell Signaling Technologies). Appropriate species-specific HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies were also used (Cell Signaling Technologies). Immunoblots were developed with Supersignal West Dura Chemiluminescent Substrate (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and visualized with a GeneGnome XRQ (Syngene) or a ChemiDoc (Bio-Rad) and analyzed using ImageJ software (NIH).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Western Blot Analysis of Protein Extracts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All chemicals were purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, MO, USA) unless noted otherwise. Cells were lysed in RIPA buffer (20 mM Tris, pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 1% NP-40, 10% glycerol, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM EGTA, 5 mM NaPPi, 50 mM NaF, 10 mM Na β-glycerophosphate) plus fresh HALT protease inhibitor cocktail (Pierce; Rockford, IL, USA) and 1 mM Na3VO4 (New England Biolabs; Ipswich, MA, USA). Lysates were sonicated for 15 s and centrifuged at 17 000 × g for 10 min at 4°C. Protein content in supernatant was quantified by BCA assay (Pierce). Protein extracts were reduced and denatured using NuPAGE (ThermoFisher Scientific) plus 1.25% β-mercaptoethanol. SDS-PAGE-separated proteins were transferred to nitrocellulose, and membranes were stained with Ponceau S to visually confirm even protein loading. Blots were probed with antibodies against ER (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX, USA; cat.# sc-8002), vinculin, β-actin (Cell Signaling Technology; Danvers, MA, USA; cat.# 13901), and FLAG (Millipore Sigma; Burlington, MA, USA; cat.# F3165). Signal was detected using horseradish-peroxidase labeled secondary antibodies (GE Healthcare; Waukesha, WI, USA) and ECL substrates (Pierce).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Dephosphorylation of CatSper1 in Sperm

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Sperm membrane fractions from 1 × 106 sperm cells prepared as above were treated with protein phosphatase 1, (PP1, 0.1 unit; NEB), protein tyrosine phosphatase (PTP1B, 5 units; Abcam), or sodium orthovanadate (Na3VO4, 1 mM; NEB) to test dephosphorylation of CatSper1. The membrane fractions were incubated with the phosphatases or Na3VO4 in a reaction buffer containing 20 mM HEPES, 0.1 mM EDTA, and 0.1 mM DTT at 30°C for the indicated times. The isolated sperm membrane was solubilized by adding Triton X-100 to the final 0.1% in PBS (PBS-T) for the indicated times at RT.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Protein Extraction and Western Blot Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All chemicals were purchased from Sigma unless otherwise noted. Cells were lysed in RIPA buffer (20 mM Tris, pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 1% NP-40, 10% glycerol, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM EGTA, 5 mM NaPPi, 50 mM NaF, 10 mM Na β-glycerophosphate) plus fresh HALT protease inhibitor cocktail (Pierce) and 1 mM Na3VO4 (New England Biolabs). Frozen tumor fragments were thawed, homogenized, and lysed in the same solution. Cell/tumor lysates were sonicated at 30% power for 15 s, centrifuged at 17,000 x g for 10 min at 4°C, and protein content in supernatant was quantified by BCA Assay (Pierce). Protein extracts were reduced and denatured in LDS sample buffer (GenScript) plus 1.25% β-mercaptoethanol. Proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE, transferred to nitrocellulose, and stained with Ponceau S to visually confirm protein loading and transfer. Blots were probed with primary antibodies against ER (Santa Cruz Biotechnology; cat.# sc-8002), vinculin (Cell Signaling Technology; cat.# 13901), PR (Cell Signaling Technology; cat.#8757), poly/mono-ADP ribose (Cell Signaling Technology; cat.#83732), Rb (Cell Signaling Technology; cat.#9309), phospho-RbS780 (Cell Signaling Technology; cat.#9307), and FLAG (Millipore Sigma; cat.# F3165). Signal was detected with DyLight conjugated secondary antibodies (Cell Signaling Technology) using the LI-COR Odyssey system (LI-COR Biosciences).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Cell Lysis and Protein Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were treated as indicated in figures, then lysed in RIPA buffer [50 mM Tris pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 1% NP-40, 0.5% deoxycholic acid, 0.1% SDS, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM EGTA, 5 mM NaPPi, 50 mM NaF, 10 mM β-glycerophosphate (Sigma), 1 mM Na3VO4 (New England Biolabs), protease inhibitor cocktail (Pierce)] on ice. Frozen patient-derived tumor samples and xenografts were also homogenized in RIPA buffer. Lysates were sonicated for 10 sec. and centrifuged at 18,000 × g for 10 min. Protein concentrations of supernatants were determined by BCA assay (Pierce). Samples were reduced and denatured by addition of 1.25% β-mercaptoethanol in NuPage sample buffer (Invitrogen). Samples were heated for 1 min. at 95°C before SDS-PAGE. Proteins were transferred to nitrocellulose membranes, which were blocked with 5% BSA/TBS-T and probed using antibodies against P-AKTT308, P-AKTS473, Actin, P-S6S240/244, PARP, cleaved caspase-3, PR (Cell Signaling), and ER (Santa Cruz). Antibody binding was detected using HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies against mouse or rabbit Ig (GE Healthcare), and ECL substrate (Pierce).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Crystallizing GFP-dynein-2 in Pre-powerstroke State

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Peak fractions of GFP-dynein-2D1091-Q4307 after SEC were pooled and concentrated to 8 mg/ml. In order to lock dynein in its pre-powerstroke state, Mg.ATP (Sigma Aldrich) and Na3VO4 (New England Biolabs) were added to a final concentration of 3 mM each. Crystals were obtained by hanging drop vapour diffusion at 19 °C mixing equal volumes of protein with reservoir solution (4-6 % PEG 6000 and 0.1 M Tris pH 8.0). Crystallization strictly depended on the presence of both Mg.ATP and Na3VO4. Crystals did not form under apo, Mg.ATP or Na3VO4 conditions. The crystal quality was markedly improved by microseeding. Seeds were prepared by harvesting GFP-dynein-2D1091-Q4307 crystals into 100 μl of reservoir solution followed by vortexing with a seed bead (Jena Bioscience) for 30 s. After diluting the seed stock 1:10000, crystallization was carried out by mixing equal volumes of protein and seeds in reservoir solution, followed by equilibration against reservoir as described above.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!