The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Digoxigenin labeled utp

Manufactured by Roche
Sourced in United States

Digoxigenin-labeled UTP is a nucleotide analog used in the detection and labeling of RNA in various molecular biology applications. It serves as a marker that can be incorporated into RNA molecules during in vitro transcription or hybridization experiments.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

8 protocols using digoxigenin labeled utp

1

Visualizing c-fos Expression in Embryos

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immediate early gene, c-fos (NM_205569) was amplified by RT-PCR using the following primers (5′-GGG ATC CGA CAG GAT GAT GTT TAC CAG CCT T-3′ and 5′-CCT CGA GGT GGA ATC TCA AAG AGT GAG GAG G-3′). The PCR product was cloned into the pGEM-T-easy vector (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). To synthesize RNA probe, pGEM-T-easy vector containing c-fos was linearized with Spe I restriction enzyme. The linearized fragment was transcribed in vitro using T7 RNA polymerase (Thermo scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and digoxigenin-labeled UTP (Roche, Basel, Switzerland). Whole-mount in situ hybridization was performed as previously described [51 (link)] with the anti-sense probe. To examine c-fos expression, embryos were fixed 30 min after 5 s-light irradiation with maximal intensity of the mercury lamp (DM 5000B, Leica, Wetzlar, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Zebrafish c/ebp-β mRNA In Situ Probe

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To make an antisense RNA probe, the amplified zebrafish c/ebp-β PCR product was sub-cloned into the pGEM T-easy vector (Promega, Madison, WI, USA), linearized with NcoІ, and transcribed in vitro by using SP6 polymerase and digoxigenin-labeled UTP (Roche). Whole-mount in situ hybridization was performed using standard protocols.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Whole-Mount In Situ Hybridization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
WISH was performed essentially as described [23 ], except RNase treatment was omitted, and BM purple (Roche Diagnostics, Tokyo, Japan) was used as a substrate. Antisense xlim-1 or pax2 template was linearized with XhoI and transcribed with T7 RNA polymerase or EcoRI and T3 RNA polymerase, respectively, using digoxigenin-labeled UTP (Roche Diagnostics, Tokyo, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Generating Antisense RNA Probes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To make an anti-sense RNA probe (ift46, foxA3, cmlc2, lefty1, lefty2 and charon), the cDNAs were subcloned into the pGEM T-easy vector (Promega), linearized with a restriction enzyme, and then transcribed in vitro using SP6 or T7 polymerase and digoxigenin-labeled UTP (Roche). Whole-mount in situ hybridization was performed using standard protocols.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Generating Riboprobes for Gene Expression Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA templates were generated by RT-PCR. The Arc DNA template was designed to amplify a fragment of the mouse Arc gene from bases 1699–2851 (NCBI RefSeq: NC_000081.7, provided by T. Kitsukawa, Ritsumeikan University, see Supplementary Fig. 9). The Fos DNA template was designed to amplify a fragment containing an intron sequence of the mouse Fos gene from bases 292–1061 (NC_000078.7, provided by T. Kitsukawa, Ritsumeikan University). The Homer1a (H1a) DNA template was designed to amplify a fragment on the 3’-untranslated region of transcript variant S of the mouse H1a gene from bases 52,325–53,088 (NC_000079.7, provided by K. Akama, Rockefeller University). Antisense RNA probes were synthesized with a mixture of either digoxigenin-labeled UTP (Roche Diagnostics) or fluorescein-labeled UTP (Roche Diagnostics) and purified using Probe quant G-50 Micro columns (GE Healthcare).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Synthesis of Antisense RNA Probe for Whole-Mount in situ Hybridization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To synthesize anti-sense RNA probe for whole-mount in situ hybridization, cDNA was PCR-amplified from total RNA extracted at 24 hpf embryos. The PCR fragments were cloned into the pGEM®-T Easy Vector (Promega, Madison, WI, United States). The cloned vectors were linearized with the NcoI restriction enzyme and then transcribed in vitro using SP6 RNA polymerase (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, United States) with digoxigenin-labeled UTP (Roche, Basel, Switzerland). The following primers were used: odf3b (NCBI, acc. no. NM_199958) forward 5′-AGA​CGT​CAT​GTC​ACC​TGT​G-3′ and odf3b reverse 5′-ATG​ACC​TGC​TTA​ATC​TTC​ACC​ATC​C-3′. Whole-mount in situ hybridization was performed as described previously (Thisse and Thisse, 2008 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

In situ Hybridization of TRPM7

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

In situ hybridization experiments followed standard procedures. Samples fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) were dehydrated by passage through a graded ethanol series and embedded in paraffin. Serial tissue sections were treated with proteinase K for 15 min at room temperature. TRPM7 riboprobes were generated by in vitro transcription using digoxigenin-labeled UTP, in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions (Roche Diagnostics Corp., Indianapolis, IN, USA). Several negative controls (e.g. sense probe and no probe) were run in parallel with the experimental reaction.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

In situ hybridization of tissue sections

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Sense and Antisense probes were in vitro transcribed using T7 RNA polymerase (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, AU) in the presence of digoxigenin-labeled UTP (Roche, Basel, CH) from PCR amplified templates that included a T7 promoter. Tissues were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde, paraffin embedded and sectioned at 8 μm. Sections were mounted on Probe-On-Plus slides (Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, US). Prehybridization, hybridization and detection were essentially following Carr & Irish [55 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!