The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

3 protocols using s36939

1

Immunofluorescence Staining of Brain Tissue

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunofluorescence staining was performed as described previously [29 (link)]. Briefly, the brain tissue was sampled as described above. The 15-25 μm brain sections were obtained, incubated with phosphate buffered saline (PBS) solution comprising 0.1% Triton X-100 for 30 min, and blocked with PBS solution comprising 5% goat serum (16210064, Gibco, NY, USA) for 30 min. Then, the sections were incubated overnight at 4°C with primary antibodies: IBA1 (ab5076, 1 : 500, Abcam, Cambrige, USA) and CD68 (ab6640, 1 : 200, Abcam, Cambrige, USA). After incubation, the sections were rinsed in PBS for 3 × 5 min washes and incubated for 1 h at 25°C with corresponding secondary antibodies: Alexa Fluor 488 antirabbit IgG (A11034, Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and Alexa Fluor 594 antigoat IgG (A11058, Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Lastly, the sections were dyed in DAPI solution (S36939; Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) for 15 min at 25°C. The images of all sections were captured blindly using an A1 Si confocal microscope (Nikon, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantifying Tumor Vasculature Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The tumor sections (6 μm) were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 3–4 h at room temperature, and rinsed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). After washing with PBS, the non-specific binding sites were blocked with 10% goat serum (GTX27481, GeneTex) for 1 h at room temperature. The samples were incubated with one or two primary antibodies, that is, mouse monoclonal anti-CD34 (1:50, Abcam, USA) and rabbit polyclonal anti-α-SMA (1:50, Abcam, USA), simultaneously in 1% goat serum at 4°C overnight. Sections were washed with PBS and incubated in the dark for 1 h with secondary antibodies: Alexa Flour® 568 goat anti-rabbit IgG (H+L) (1:200, A11011, Invitrogen) and Alexa Flour® 488 goat anti-mouse IgG (H+L) (1:200, A1106, Invitrogen). After washing three times with PBS for 5 min, the nuclei were stained with DAPI (S36939, Invitrogen) for 15 min, and the sections were then examined under a confocal scanning microscope (BX41F; Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). The ratio of α-SMA/CD34 was calculated by dividing the positive area of α-SMA adjacent to CD34-positive vessels by the total area of CD34-positive tumor vasculature under five 200× high-powered randomly chosen fields per slide.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantifying LAMA4 Immunofluorescence in Tissue

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tissue was fixed in 10% formalin, paraffin embedded, and sectioned at 5μm thickness by a microtome at the University of Chicago Human Tissue Resources Center. Sections were baked for 60 minutes at 60°C, deparaffinized, and rehydrated in xylenes and alcohol. Heat induced epitope retrieval was performed with citric acid-EDTA buffer pH 6.2 as recommended by the manufacturer of the LAMA4 antibody. Sections were blocked in 10% donkey serum (Abcam ab7475) and incubated with primary antibody (anti-laminin alpha 4, Novus NBP2-42393, 1:300 dilution) overnight at 4°C. An Alexa Fluor-488 conjugated secondary antibody was added for 1 hour at room temperature (Abcam ab150113). Following incubation, sections were washed, stained with DAPI (Invitrogen S36939), and sealed. Images were taken using Fixed-DSU Confocal at the University of Chicago Integrated Light Microscopy Core and quantification of fluorescent signal was determined using ImageJ. All images were processed equally and in an unbiased manner to remove intracellular LAMA4 signal and background noise before signal quantification and analysis. Macro code for ImageJ analysis can be found in the Supplementary Materials file.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!