The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Prism 8 for mac osx

Manufactured by GraphPad
Sourced in United States

Prism 8 for Mac OSX is a data analysis and graphing software. It provides tools for data analysis, curve fitting, and graph creation. The software is compatible with Mac OSX operating systems.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

Lab products found in correlation

7 protocols using prism 8 for mac osx

1

Statistical Analysis of Treatment Groups

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Analyses were performed with Prism 8 for Mac OSX (Prism). Comparison of multiple treatment groups were made using 1-way analysis of variance (Tukey’s Multiple Comparisons Test). An unpaired t test was used for 2 groups.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Comparative Analysis of Treatments

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data are presented as mean standard deviation of mean if not otherwise indicated. Data were tested for normal distribution using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Normal distribution was assumed when α > 0.1. T-tests were performed to detect pairwise differences within and between groups. For all tests, after Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons, statistical significance was presumed at P < 0.05. Statistical analysis was performed using PRISM 8 for MAC OS X (La Jolla, CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Skeletal Muscle Contractility Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Depending on data normality, tested with Shapiro–Wilk test, the following parametric or non‐parametric statistical tests were used. Comparisons between two groups were conducted with two‐tailed t‐test or Mann–Whitney U test. In instances where more than two groups needed to be compared, one‐way analysis of variance (ANOVA) or Kruskal–Wallis one‐way ANOVA were performed. Two‐way mixed ANOVAs [groups (CRE‐ littermate controls vs. FoxP1iSkmTg/Tg) × treatment (vehicle vs. tamoxifen)] were used to test for differences in tissue masses as well as to evaluate differences between groups (CRE‐ littermate controls vs. FoxP1iSkmTg/Tg) in forces evoked at different frequencies or throughout the fatiguing protocol. When ANOVAs detected differences, Tukey (for one‐way ANOVA), Dunn's (for Kruskal–Wallis one‐way ANOVA), and Sidak (two‐way ANOVA) post hoc analyses were used to test for differences among pairs of means. The alpha level of significance was set to 0.05. Data are reported as mean ± standard error. All statistical analyses were performed with SigmaPlot software for Windows (version 11, Systat, Chicago, IL, USA) and Prism 8 for MacOS X (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA, USA). Prism 8 was also used for figures.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Detailed Statistical Analysis Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All values are given as mean ± SEM. Statistical analyses were performed using PRISM 8 for Mac OS X (GraphPad Software, Inc., La Jolla, CA). Data were tested for normality and equal variance to confirm the appropriateness of parametric tests. Data that followed a normal distribution were analyzed by Student t test, Welch t test, one-way ANOVA with Tukey post hoc test, or two-way ANOVA with Tukey or Sidak post hoc tests, where appropriate. Data that failed normal distribution were analyzed by Mann-Whitney U test or by Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn post hoc test. A P value of less than 0.05 was considered significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Cocaine Sensitivity and Dopamine Receptor Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All statistical tests were performed using Prism 8 for Mac OSX (GraphPad Software, LLC; San Diego, CA, USA); differences were considered statistically significant when p<0.05. D2R availability in each brain region was quantified as the distribution volume ratio (DVR) using the cerebellum as the reference region. Pearson correlations were computed between D2R availability ([11C]raclopride DVR) in each brain region and two measures of sensitivity to cocaine: the dose at which acquisition occurred and the potency of cocaine as a reinforcer during determination of the initial self-administration curve, quantified as the ED50 of each monkey’s curve (See Tryhus et al. 2021 ). Next, correlations were computed between D3R sensitivity (ED50 of the quinpirole-induced yawning curve, see Say et al. 2022 (link)) and the same two measures of cocaine self-administration. Note that because “dose at acquisition” is an ordinal rather than continuous variable, a non-parametric Spearman correlation was used for those analyses.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Morphine Analgesic Efficacy with NFP

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tail-withdrawal latencies were recorded for each mouse and data were expressed as percent maximum possible effect (%MPE) as follows: [(test-baseline)/(10-baseline)*100]. Control data represented %MPE values obtained after administration of saline (morphine vehicle) and either 0.3 mg/kg NFP or saline (NFP's vehicle) on the respective test day. Within-group analyses were conducted separately for %MPE data generated during Day 1 and Day 7 for each group using a repeated measure ANOVA with morphine dose as the within-subjects factor. Fisher’s LSD post-hoc tests were used to identify significant differences of morphine dose vs control. Separate two-way ANOVAs comparing %MPE scores between the Vehicle and NFP groups during Day 1 and Day 7 were additionally conducted. Data were subsequently analyzed using Fisher’s LSD post-hoc tests comparing Vehicle and NFP groups at each morphine dose on each day. All statistical tests were conducted using microcomputer software (Prism 8 for Mac OSX, GraphPad Software, Inc., San Diego, CA), and all types of comparisons were considered statistically significant if P < 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Cocaine Reinforcement in Ethanol Drinkers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All statistical tests were performed using Prism 8 for Mac OSX (GraphPad Software, LLC; San Diego, CA, USA); differences were considered statistically significant when p<0.05. To determine whether there were differences in sensitivity to acquisition of cocaine reinforcement between ethanol drinkers and controls, a log-rank (Mantel-Cox) analysis of Kaplan-Meier survival curves was performed. To compare the reinforcing potency of cocaine between the groups, the ED50 of the ascending limb of the initial cocaine dose-effect curve was calculated by interpolation of the linear portion of the curve. A two-tailed, unpaired t-test compared these values between groups.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!