The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

31 protocols using fiastar 5000 analyzer

1

Soil Sampling and Physicochemical Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
At the end of August 2022, 48 soil samples were collected by drilling 0–20 cm soil layers in 48 plots, removing the stones, roots, and other impurities, and dividing them into two subsamples. Subsample 1 (10 g) was wrapped in foil, quickly placed in liquid nitrogen, transported back to the laboratory, and stored at −80°C for soil DNA extraction. Subsample 2 (200 g) was transported back to the laboratory and stored at −4°C to determine the soil physicochemical properties.
Soil-dissolved carbon (DOC) was extracted by adding 50 mL of 0.5 M potassium sulfate to subsamples of 12.5 g homogenized soil and agitating the sample on an orbital shaker at 120 rpm for 1 h. The filtrate was analyzed using a TOC analyzer (multi N/C 3100, Analytik Jena, Germany). Soil microbial biomass carbon (MBC) and microbial biomass nitrogen (MBN) were estimated using a chloroform fumigation extraction method (Brookes et al., 1985 (link)). Soil NH4+ and NO3 concentrations were determined by extraction with 2 M KCl solution followed by colorimetric analysis on a FIAstar 5,000 Analyzer (FIAstar 5,000 Analyzer, Foss Tecator, Hillerød, Denmark). Soil pH was determined in a 1:2.5 soil: water solution (w/v).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Comprehensive Soil Nutrient Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Soil total carbon (TC) and total nitrogen (TN) were measured using an EA 3000 elemental analyzer (Grunert et al., 2019 (link)). The pH was determined using the potentiometric method with a water-to-soil ratio of 2.5:1 (Yang et al., 2020 (link)). The available phosphorus (AP) content was determined using the hydrochloric acid ammonium chloride method. Soil organic matter (SOM) content was measured using the K2Cr2O7 oxidation method. Available potassium (AK) was assayed using flame photometry (Song et al., 2020 (link)). Solutions were analyzed using an FIAstar 5,000 Analyzer (Foss Tecator, Denmark) to obtain NH₄+-N and NO3-N values (Huang et al., 2015 (link)). Available soil N was calculated as the sum of NH₄+-N and NO3-N.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Multivariate Nutrient Analysis Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total nitrogen content ([N], %) was analyzed with the Kjeldahl method, using a Kjeltec Auto 1030 Analyzer (Foss Tecator AB, Höganäs, Sweden). Phosphorus ([P], %) was determined spectrophotometrically via Kjeldahl digestion, using a FIAstar 5000 Analyzer (FOSS Tecator AB), and potassium ([K], %) was determined by flame photometry using the Sherwood Model 425 Flame Photometer in the Laboratory of Plant Biochemistry at the Estonian University of Life Sciences.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Soil Carbon, Nitrogen, and Vegetation Dynamics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total soil organic carbon and nitrogen (TOC and TN) at the depths of 0–10 and 10–20 cm were measured by a TOC-5000A analyzer (Shimadzu Corp, Kyoto, Japan) and a Vario EL III Elemental Analyzer (Elementar, Hanau, Germany). The supernatant of soil solution was used for NH4+-N and NO3-N measurement through a FIAstar 5000 Analyzer (FOSS, Hillerd, Denmark) as previously described (Yang et al. 2013 ).
Aboveground vegetation properties were measured by indices of species number, abundance, diversity, aboveground biomass, and average height based on common protocols (Yang et al. 2013 ). Among these, the species number and abundance were counted during field sampling. Plant biomass was weighed after mowing. The diversity was calculated by the Shannon–Weaver index (Liu et al. 2014 ). To measure the average height and coverage of the vegetation canopy, the 1 × 1 m quadrat was divided into 100 0.1 × 0.1 m small squares, then touched species were measured by 0.1 cm marks along a vertical ruler held behind the pin. The canopy height of shrub in 1 × 1 m quadrat was calculated by the average of all species in the zone.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Comprehensive Soil Analysis Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All of the nine replicate soil samples collected from each grazing zone were analyzed for physical and chemical properties. Soil pH was determined using a 1:2.5 soil/water mixture. After the mass was stabilized by drying at 105°C for 24 h, the water content of the soil was calculated. Water and inorganic carbon were removed by reacting the samples with phosphoric acid (Schumacher, 2002 ), after which soil organic carbon and total nitrogen were measured using the NC analyzer dry combustion method (Sumigraph NC-900; Sumika Chemical Analysis Service, Tokyo, Japan). For chemical analyses, soil was digested in H2SO4 for total nitrogen and in H2SO4/HCl for total phosphorus, extracted with KCl for nitrate and ammonium, and analyzed using an automated flow analysis instrument (FIAstar 5000 Analyzer; Foss Tecator, Hillerød, Denmark).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Soil Nutrient and Microbial Biomass Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The soil samples were collected from 0 to 10 cm soil layer in each plot using an auger in mid-August every year. The soil available N content (NH4+–N and NO3–N) was extracted with a 2 mol L–1 KCl solution and determined with a continuous flow spectrophotometer (FIAstar 5000 Analyzer; Foss Tecator, Hillerød, Denmark). The soil microbial biomass C (MBC) and N (MBN) were measured using the chloroform fumigation extraction method (Brookes et al., 1985 (link); Fu et al., 2012 (link)). Fumigated and unfumigated soil samples were extracted with 100 ml 0.5 mol L–1 K2SO4 and filtered with a 0.45-μm membrane. The extractable organic carbon and total N were determined by an automatic carbon analyzer (Phoenix 8000) and flow injection nitrogen analyzer (FIAStar5000, FOSS Inc), respectively. Extractable carbon and N were converted to MBC and MBN using a conversion coefficient of 0.45 for both measurements (Fu et al., 2012 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Measuring Leaf Area and Nutrient Content

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The leaf-blade area of all leaves of the sample branches was measured with an LI-3100C optical area meter (LI-COR Biosciences, Lincoln, NE, USA). To calculate a tree’s total foliage area, a regression model was used (Table 2). Leaf area ratio (LAR) was considered as the total leaf area per unit tree aboveground dry mass.
Leaf N concentrations were determined by block digestion and steam distillation methods (Kjeltec Auto 1030 Analyzer, FOSS Tecator AB, Höganäs, Sweden). Phosphorus (P) concentrations of plant material were determined spectrophotometrically from Kjeldahl digests using a FIAstar 5000 Analyzer (FOSS Tecator AB). Chemical analyses were performed at the Laboratory of Biochemistry, Estonian University of Life Sciences.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Soil and Plant Nutrient Analyses

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Soil moisture content was measured gravimetrically after drying at 105°C for 24 h. Soil pH was measured in 1 M KCl (1∶5 w/v) using a pH electrode. Soil organic carbon and total N were analyzed by the CHNS-analysis system (Elementar Analysen Systeme, GmbH, Hanau, Germany) with the burning method at 450°C and 1250°C, respectively. The concentration of soil available N (NO3-N+NH4-N) was measured using a FIAstar 5000 Analyzer (FOSS, Hillerød, Denmark) after extraction with 2 M KCl (1∶5 w/v). Soil available P was extracted following the Mehlich-3 method and measured using the molybdate-blue colorimetrical method [43] . Plant N content was analyzed by the San++ Continuous Flow Analyzer (Skalar Analytical B.V., Breda, Netherlands) using the semi-micro Kjeldahl method. Plant P content was measured using the molybdate-blue colorimetric method after digestion with sulfuric acid [44] .
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Soil Physicochemical Properties Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Dry soil aliquots (humus layer and mineral soil), as well as fine and coarse root samples were milled to a fine powder (Retsch MN 400, Haan, Germany). The soil pH was determined using a glass electrode (pH meter, WTW, Weilheim, Germany) in a 1:2.5 soil:water solution (w/v). The total carbon (TC) and total nitrogen (TN) were measured using an Elemental Analyzer (Elementar, Vario ELIII, Elementar Analysen Systeme GmbH, Germany). Nitrate (NO3) and ammonium (NH4+) concentrations were determined via flow injection analysis (FIAstar 5000 Analyzer, Foss Tecator, Hilleroed, Denmark) following the extraction of the soil samples in 2 mo1/L KCL solution. The NO3 was determined through the Dual Wavelength Spectrophotometry method and NH4+ by the indophenol blue colorimetric technique [35 ]. The total phosphorus (TP) was measured via Inductively Coupled Plasma Optical Emission Spectrometry (ICP OES) (iCAP 6300 Series, Thermo Fischer Scientific, Dreieich, Germany), subsequent to extraction by 65% HNO3 at 160 °C for 12 h. The available phosphorus (AP) was extracted using 0.5 M NaHCO3 (pH 8.5) and then quantified using the molybdenum blue method. The gravimetric soil water content was determined by weighing the soil samples prior to and following drying at 105 °C for 24 h [36 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Automated Analysis of Nutrient Ions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Concentrations of NH4+, NO2, and NO3 were measured according to the US EPA procedures [30 ] using a fully automated flow-injection system (FIA-star 5000 analyzer, Foss Tecator, Höganäs, Sweden) in water samples.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!