The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Genomestudio gene expression module

Manufactured by Illumina
Sourced in United States

The GenomeStudio Gene Expression Module is a software tool developed by Illumina for the analysis of gene expression data generated from Illumina microarray platforms. It provides a comprehensive suite of data visualization and analysis tools to help researchers explore and interpret their gene expression data.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

19 protocols using genomestudio gene expression module

1

RNA Expression Profiling of 143B Tumors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Purified total RNA from both early and late progression tumours derived from each 143B cell line was labelled, amplified and hybridized to HumanHT-12 v4 Expression BeadChip Kit (Illumina, Scoresby, VIC, Australia) in triplicate though the Australian Genome Research Facility Ltd (AGRF; Walter Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, VIC, Australia), according to the manufacturer’s protocols. Expression data were analysed using GenomeStudio Gene Expression Module (Illumina) and the limma package of R Bio-conductor50 (http://www.r-project.org).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Whole Genome Expression Analysis of FFPE Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Whole genome gene expression analysis was performed using the Illumina (San Diego, CA, USA) WG-DASL assay according to manufacturer's protocol. Briefly, 100 ng of FFPE RNA was converted to cDNA by the WG-DASL assay using biotinylated-tagged random nonamer and oligo (dT) primers. The biontinylated cDNA was then mounted onto a streptavidin-coated support and further extended and ligated by gene-specific oligonucleotides (DAP). Subsequently, PCR amplification was performed. The resulting PCR products were eluted and hybridized to the Illumina Human-Ref v3.0 Beadchip and scanned with the Illumina iScan Reader. The image intensity values from the microarray images generated were then analysed by the GenomeStudio Gene Expression Module (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) software. The processed methylation values were subsequently used for further analysis in this study.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Profiling Gene Expression in Temporal Lobe Epilepsy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For gene expression analyses, we used human hippocampal biopsy tissue from patients with hippocampal sclerosis (n=79) versus patients with lesion-associated (low-grade neoplasms or dysplasia; n=35) chronic TLE, who underwent surgical treatment in the Epilepsy Surgery Program at the University of Bonn Medical Center due to pharmacoresistance. In all patients, presurgical evaluation using a combination of non-invasive and invasive procedures revealed that seizures originated in the mesial temporal lobe42 (link). All procedures were conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Ethics Committee of the University of Bonn Medical Center. Informed written consent was obtained from all patients. Clinical characteristics per subgroup are described in Supplementary Table 3. mRNA analyses for CaV3.2 and MTF1 were carried out analogous to a procedure described elsewhere in detail43 (link). Briefly, RNA from biopsies representing all hippocampal subfields served to generate 750 ng cRNA used for hybridization on Human HT-12 v3 Expression BeadChips with Illumina Direct Hybridization Assay Kit (Illumina, San Diego, CA) according to standard procedures. We extracted data for CaV3.2 and MTF1 analysed by Illumina's GenomeStudio Gene Expression Module and normalized using Illumina BeadStudio software suite by quantile normalization with background subtraction.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Illumina Gene Expression Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Aliquots of 250ng of high-quality total RNA from each sample was used for the mRNA expression profiling using Illumina Gene Expression BeadChip Array technology (Illumina, Inc., San Diego, CA). First- and second-strand reverse transcription step, followed by a single in vitro transcription (IVT) amplification that incorporates biotin-labeled nucleotides, was performed with Illumina TotalPrep −96 RNA Amplification Kit (Ambion, Austin, TX). 750ng of the biotin-labeled IVT product (cRNA) was hybridized to HumanHT-12_v4_BeadChip (Illumina, Inc., San Diego, CA) for 16 hours, followed by washing, blocking, and streptavidin-Cy3 staining according to the Whole-Genome Gene Expression Direct Hybridization protocol (Illumina, Inc., San Diego, CA). The arrays were scanned using HiScanSQ System and obtained decoded images were analyzed by GenomeStudio Gene Expression Module – an integrated platform for the data visualization and analysis (Illumina, Inc., San Diego, CA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Differential Gene Expression Analysis in MRKHS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
BeadChip data files were analysed with Illumina’s GenomeStudio gene expression module (and Bioconductor package) to determine gene expression signal levels. Briefly, the raw intensity of Illumina Human HT-12 v3.0 gene expression array was scanned and extracted using BeadScan, with the data corrected by background subtraction in GenomeStudio module.
The data obtained from the two populations were analysed for differences in expression. Up or down regulated transcript lists were obtained using average normalization, error model Illumina Custom, selected by p<0.00001, Diff Score>20 and fold change >2.
Heatmap was generated through the web interface Matrix2png, version 1.2.2 (http://www.chibi.ubc.ca/matrix2png/) [19] (link).
Area-proportional Venn diagram for the comparison and visualization of biological lists of patients affected by type I or type II MRKHS was generated through the web application BioVenn (http://www.cmbi.ru.nl/cdd/biovenn/) [20] (link).
The data discussed in this publication have been deposited in NCBI’ s Gene Expression Omnibus and are accessible through GEO Series accession number GSE52609 (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE52609).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Microarray Analysis of Hippocampal Tissue in Mesial TLE

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All 129 patients considered in this study had mesial TLE and all tissue samples were from indistinguishable hippocampal tissue portions. Sample preparation and microarray analysis of human hippocampi are detailed in Supplementary Methods. Expression data were analysed using Illumina’s GenomeStudio Gene Expression Module and normalized by quantile normalization with background subtraction. Microarray probes were annotated using either the Human HT-12 v3 annotation file or Ensembl (release 72). All patients gave informed consent for use of their tissue and all procedures were conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Ethics Committee of the University of Bonn Medical Center.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Differential Gene Expression Analysis of RNA Hybridization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Text or excel files for each RNA hybridization were created by the Illumina® GenomeStudio Gene Expression Module (Version 1.0), and then analyzed in R3.2.5 (http://www.R-project.org/). The Limma package[19 (link)] (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16646809) was used to perform background adjustment, summarization, and quantile normalization. Normalization was made using the robust multichip average (RMA) pre-normalization algorithm[20 (link)]. Data quality assessment was accomplished by using various quality control measures. Specifically, box plots are utilized to compare probe intensity levels among the arrays of the dataset. The median lines were not significantly different from each other after normalization. For each replicate array, gene expression ratios were generated by comparing each probe-set signal value from taurine-treated samples to that from control samples. DEGs were then identified by the Limma package with multiple testing correction using the Benjamini-Hochberg false discovery rate. The statistically significant DEGs were calculated using volcano plot analysis with the absolute value of log2 fold change (FC) (|log2FC| ≥ 1.5) and a P-value < 0.05. Moreover, DEGs were visualized by hierarchical clustering analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

FFPE RNA Whole Genome Expression Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Whole genome gene expression analysis was performed using the Illumina (Illumina, CA, USA) WG‐DASL assay in accordance with the manufacturer's protocol. In brief, 100 ng of FFPE RNA was converted to cDNA by the WG‐DASL assay using biotin‐tagged random nonamer and oligo (dT) primers. The biotinylated cDNA was then mounted onto a streptavidin‐coated support and further extended and ligated by gene‐specific oligonucleotides. Subsequently, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification was performed. The resulting PCR products were eluted and hybridized to the Illumina Human‐Ref v3.0 Beadchip and scanned with the Illumina iScan Reader (Illumina). The image intensity values from the microarray images generated were then analyzed using the GenomeStudio Gene Expression Module (Illumina) software. The processed expression values were subsequently used for further analysis in this study.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Differential Gene Expression Analysis of Spinal Metastasis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The initial array scan intensity data were analyzed using Illumina Genome Studio Gene Expression Module software (v1.1.1; Illumina Inc.). Data pre-processing, such as background adjustment, normalization and log transformation of the values, was performed. Furthermore, the probe-level data were converted to gene expression values. Where several probes corresponded to one gene, the mean value of the probe-level data was taken as the gene expression value. Cluster analysis was used to group the patients into clusters. Patients assigned to the same cluster are more closely related to one another compared with patients assigned to different clusters. An unpaired t-test analysis was used to identify the DEGs between the spinal metastasis and normal groups. Then, the log2 fold change value was calculated. The raw P-values were adjusted into false discovery rates (FDRs) using the Benjamin and Hochberg method as described previously (15 (link)). An FDR <0.05 and |log2FC|>1 were used as the cut-off criteria to identify significantly DEGs. Finally, the cluster analysis was used to group the cases into clusters according to the DEGs.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Illumina Gene Expression Profiling Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was extracted using TRIzol (Invitrogen), subjected to DNAseI treatment (DNA Free; Ambion), and subsequently amplified using the Illumina TotalPrepTM-96 RNA Amplification Kit (Life Technologies). Labeled cRNAs were hybridized onto HumanHT-12 v4 Expression BeadChips (Illumina) according to the manufacturer’s instructions and scanned with the Illumina BeadScanner. Illumina GenomeStudio Gene Expression Module was employed for initial data processing, and probes were annotated with approved symbols (HUGO; version 2015/01/14) and further processed with Lumi (21 (link), 22 (link)). Probes not detected on three or more arrays were removed and the remaining data quantile normalized (n = 21,209 probes). A linear model was fitted to the gene expression data using the R Limma package (23 (link)). Differentially expressed genes between the contrasts were gauged using the Limma empirical Bayes statistics module, adjusting for multiple testing using Benjamini and Hochberg correction.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!