The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

86 protocols using 24 well insert

1

Transwell Migration and Invasion Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For the Transwell migration assay, 40,000 cells were seeded into the upper chambers (24-well insert, Corning). The upper chambers were filled with 300 μL serum-free PRIM-1640 medium, while the lower chambers contained 700 μL PRIM-1640 medium with 10% fetal bovine serum. For the Transwell invasion assay, 25,000 cells were plated into the upper chambers (24-well insert, Corning) coated with Matrigel (diluted 1:8 in PBS; product #354234; Corning, USA). After 24 h, the cells under the surface of the lower chamber were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 20 min, followed by a 1 h 0.5% crystal violet staining.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Transwell Migration and Invasion Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For the transwell migration assay, 1000 cells were plated into the upper chambers (24-well insert, pore size 8 μm, Corning) with 100 μL serum-free PRIM-1640. The lower chambers were filled with 500 μL PRIM-1640 containing 10% fetal bovine serum. Two days later, cells under the surface of the lower chamber were washed with PBS and stained with 0.5% crystal violet for 30 min.
For the invasion assay, 2000 cells were seeded on transwells (24-well insert, pore size 8 μm, Corning) coated with 60 μL Matrigel (1:3 dilution in PBS, Product #354234, Corning Inc., NY, USA). The culture conditions were the same as described for the transwell migration assay. After 72 h, adherent cells on the lower surface were stained with 0.5% crystal violet. The number of cells on the lower surface was photographed with a microscope (Leica DM IL, Leica Microsystems) equipped with a digital camera (Leica DFC300FX).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Cell Migration Assay Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells (5 × 104) were placed into the upper chamber (24-well insert, 8 μm, Corning Costar) with FBS-free RPMI 1640 medium. RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 10% FBS was used as an attractant in the lower chamber. After being incubated for 36 h, cells migrated through the membrane were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (Santa Cruz) and stained with 1% crystal violet (Shanghai Sangon Company). The stained cell images were captured by microscope (Olympus), and five random fields at ×10 magnification were counted. Results represented the average of triplicate samples from three independent experiments.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Transwell-based Migration and Invasion Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After 24 h transfection, cell concentration was adjusted to 5 × 104 cells/ml with serum-free medium. The upper chamber of Transwell chamber (Costar; 24-well insert, pore size: 8 μ m) was filled with 200 μl of cell suspension, and the lower chamber was filled with 500 μl of medium with 10% FBS. For the invasion assay, polycarbonate filters coated with 50 μl Matrigel (1:9, BD Bioscience) were placed in a Transwell chamber. Cells were incubated for 12 h for the migration assay, and 36 h for the invasion assay. Cells on the bottom surface of the membrane were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde and stained with 0.5 % crystal violet. The migratory cells were visualized and counted in five random visual fields per insert under an inverted microscope at 100× magnification (Nikon MicrophotFX, Japan). The experiment was repeated three times.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Transwell Assay for Cell Migration and Invasion

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After 48 h of transfection, cell concentration in each group was adjusted to 2 × 105 cells/mL with serum-free medium. The upper chamber of Transwell chamber (Costar; 24-well insert, pore size: 8 μm) was filled with 200 μl cell suspension, and the lower chamber was filled with 500 μL of medium supplementing 15 % FBS. For the invasion assay, polycarbonate filters coated with 50 μL Matrigel (1:9, BD Bioscience) were placed in a Transwell chamber. Three wells were used for each group. Cells were incubated for 24 h for the migration assay and 48 h for the invasion assay. Then, the cells on the upper surface were wiped slightly using cotton swabs, and the cells on the lower surface were fixed with 4 % paraformaldehyde and stained with 0.1 % crystal violet. The migratory cells were visualized and counted in five random visual fields per insert under an inverted microscope at 200× magnification (Nikon Microphot-FX, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Transwell Migration and Wound Healing Assays

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For Transwell migration assays (Corning Costar), 24‐well insert, and 8 mm pore polycarbonate membrane were used. The lower chamber was added with 700 ml of media with 20% FBS, while upper insert was added with 1 × 105 cells re‐suspended in serum‐free media post‐transfection. After Transwell membranes were fixed for the set time, they were subjected to crystal violet staining. A light microscope (Olympus) was used for counting the cells adhered to the lower membrane surface.
For wound healing assay, following 24 hr of transfection, a micropipette tip was employed for straight scratch in each well center. In each well, cells migrated to the scratch, which was observed to analyze cell migration. Twenty‐four hours later, the speed of wound closure was measured and normalized to the length at 0 hr. Each assay was conducted in triplicate.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Activation and Migration of PBMCs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell migration assay was conducted using 24-well insert (Costar) with 5-µm pores. PBMCs from normal, healthy donors were activated with either CPG-ODN, a synthetic TLR9 agonist (Invitrogen), or Phytohemagglutinin (PHA) (Sigma) or anti-human IgM (Jackson Immuno Research) and anti CD40 monoclonal antibody, clone B-B20 (BioSite).
The activation status of the cells was then investigated by measuring CD69 expression on CD19+ and CD3+ PBMCs by Flow cytometry prior to migration assay. After 2 days of activation, 0.5 × 106 PBMCs were added in the upper insert of the migration plates whereas 0.6 ml of supernatant from HIV-1 exposed or non-exposed FDCs were added in the lower insert. After 4 h at 37 °C, the inserts were removed, the cells collected from the lower wells and counted in a hemacytometer. Thereafter, the migrated cells were fixed with 2 % PFA and the frequency of CD19 and CD3 positive cells among migrated cells was evaluated.
The monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) used to identify and characterize the PBMCs in the migration assay are PE anti-CD69, FITC and PE anti-CD19, APC and FITC anti-CD3, PE and FITC isotype antibodies all purchased from BD Bioscience.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Cell Invasion and Migration Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Migration and invasion assays were performed as described previously [53 (link)]. Briefly, a transwell invasion assay used 2 105 cells plated in a Matrigel (BD Biosciences, Bedford, MA)-coated top chamber and incubated for 24 h (with a 24-well insert and a pore size of 8 μm; Corning Costar, Corning, NY). In this assay, cells which had been pretreated for 1 h with osthole (20~80 μM) were plated in medium without serum or growth factors, and medium supplemented with serum was used as a chemoattractant in the lower chamber. After 24 h of incubation, cells that had invaded through the pores were removed with a cotton swab. Cells on the lower surface of the membrane were fixed with methanol and stained with crystal violet. The number of cells invading through the membrane was counted under a light microscope (×40, three random fields per well).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Cell Migration and Invasion Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For migration assay, approximately 4 × 104 transfected cells in 200 µl of serum-free medium were plated into the upper chamber (24-well insert; 8-µm pore size; Corning Costar, Corning, NY, USA), while 600 µl complete medium (with 10% FBS) as chemoattractant was added into the lower chamber. After 24 h incubation, the cells that migrated to the lower chamber were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 30 min and stained with 0.1% crystal violet for 10 min. The number of migrated cells was quantified under a microscope (magnification, ×200) in five random microscope fields. The procedure of invasion assay was similar to the migration assay except for the addition of 50 µl Matrigel on the membranes of transwell inserts and incubation time of 48 h.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Transwell Assay for Cell Migration and Invasion

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
1 × 105 KYSE‐30 cells, KYSE‐150 cells, or TE‐1 cells transfected with miRNA inhibitors, mimics, or negative controls were pipetted into the upper chambers (24‐well insert, 8 μm pore size; Corning Costar) with 200 μL RPMI‐1640 medium without FBS. Additionally, the lower chambers need to add 600 μL medium with 20% FBS as a chemo‐attractant. After 15−20 h incubation, cells on the upper side were wiped off with a cotton‐tipped swab, while the cells on the lower side were fixed with 4% formaldehyde and stained using 0.05% crystal violet for 10 min. The protocol of cell invasion assays was similar to the cell migration assay. The difference was the 200 μg/mL Matrigel (356234; Becton, Dickinson and Company) need to precoat at the transwell units overnight. The cells on the membrane of the lower side were considered as migrated/invaded cells and were photographed and counted at ×200 magnification.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!