The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

4 protocols using sumo1

1

Ubiquitination and SUMO Assays in HEK293T Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Ubiquitination and SUMO assays were performed as described previously (31 (link), 65 (link)). At 36 h after transfection, HEK293T cells were treated for 12 h with 1 μM, 5 μM, and 10 μM of the proteasome inhibitor MG132. In addition, HEK293T cells transfected with wildtype or HCN4-R666Q mutant plasmid were treated with 5 μM MG132 for 12 h. Total protein was collected and analyzed by immunoblotting using the following antibodies: SUMO1 (1:1000, Proteintech) and SUMO2/3/4 (1:1000, Santa Cruz).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Western Blot Protein Analysis Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total proteins were extracted from cells or tissues using the M-PER mammalian protein extraction reagent (Thermo Pierce, Rockford, USA) and measured using the BCA Protein Assay (Thermo Pierce). Protein samples (50 μg per assay) were separated on SDS-PAGE gels and transferred to PVDF membranes. The membranes were blocked with 5% skim milk and then incubated overnight at 4 °C in the presence of primary antibodies. The primary antibodies for p21, p53, KHSRP, c-Myc, EPCAM, and β-actin were purchased from Cell Signaling Technologies (CST, Danvers, MA, USA), p-c-Myc antibody was from Santa Cruz (CA, USA), and IκBα, Rb1, STAT3, histone-H3, SUMO1, and SUMO2/3 antibodies were from the Proteintech Company (Chicago, IL, USA). The membranes were washed 3 times in Tris-buffered saline with Tween-20 and incubated with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody (CST, MA, USA) for 1 h at room temperature (RT). After washing 3 times with 15 mL of TBST, Immobilon Western Chemiluminescent HRP Substrate (Millipore, Billerica, USA) was added, and the bands were imaged with the Chemidoc XRS+ electrophoretic imaging system (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). Density scanning of each protein band was performed using Image Lab software (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantitative Analysis of SUMOylation Patterns

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The above prepared cell lysates or immunoprecipitates were separated on 10% (vol/vol) polyacrylamide gels and transferred onto PVDF membranes. The lysates and imminoprecipitates were probed with primary antibodies, including SUMO1, SUMO2/3 (Cell Signaling, Danvers, MA, USA), SUMO-specific protease 3 (SENP3), SUMO-specific protease 7 (SENP7) and beta-actin (Santa Cruz, Delaware, California, USA), and UBC9 (Cell Signaling, Danvers, MA, USA) for quantitative Western blot analysis, respectively, to confirm that the CSE insulted HBEs underwent a change in terms of total SUMOylation levels or patterns [14 (link)]. Similarly, to verify that CYP1A1 was SUMOylated by SUMO1, the above precipitates were probed with a CYP1A1 antibody (13241–1-AP) (Proteintech Group, Inc., Wuhan, China) and the reactive bands were developed using the established techniques [17 (link)]. Briefly, the membranes were incubated with an indicated primary antibody at 4 °C overnight. After washes with TBST (0.5% Tween) five times, the membranes were probed with an appropriate HRP-conjugated secondary antibody for 1 h, and the reactive bands were visualized using the ECL reagents (Servicebio, Wuhan, China) as instructed. Quantitative analysis of relative intensity of each band was conducted using the Image J software and β-actin was used for normalization.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantification of Mitochondrial Dynamics Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
BCA Protein Colorimetric Assay Kit (Elabscience Biotechnology Co., Ltd., China) was used to quantify the total protein of brain cortex tissues and SY5Y cells. Samples with an equal amount of protein were loaded and separated via sodium dodecyl sulfate‐polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS‐PAGE). The proteins were transferred to the appropriate polyvinylidene fluoride membrane (Millipore, USA), blocked with 5% skimmed milk for 1 h, and thens incubated with diluted antibodies at 4°C overnight. For the in vivo experiments, Drp1 (1:2000), Fis1 (1:1500), MFF (1:8000), OPA1 (1:2000), Mfn1 (1:1000), Mfn2 (1:2000), and β‐actin (1:5000) antibodies were purchased from Proteintech Group, Inc., China. Meanwhile, for the in vitro experiments, the antibodies included Drp1 (1:800; AiFang Biological, China), Fis1 (1:1500; Bioss, China), OPA1 (1:1000; AiFang Biological, China), Mfn1 (1:1000; Affinity, China), Mfn2 (1:500; AiFang Biological, China), and SENP6 (1:1000; Abcam, USA). Furthermore, MFF (1:2000), SUMO1 (1:2000), SUMO2/3 (1:500), SENP1 (1:2000), SENP2 (1:1000), SENP3 (1:800), SENP5 (1:3000), and β‐actin (1:5000) were obtained from Proteintech Group, Inc., China. Then, the membranes were washed and incubated with secondary antibodies for 2 h at room temperature. After rewashing with TBST buffer, the membranes were added ECL reagent to enable the detection of the protein bands.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!