The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

14 protocols using apreo s lovac

1

Comprehensive Characterization of Advanced Materials

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images were taken with an FEI Apreo S LoVac scanning electron microscope. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images were obtained with a JEOL-2100F system equipped with EDAX Genesis XM2. The in situ X-ray diffraction (XRD) measurements were performed on a Rigaku Smartlab9KW Diffraction System using monochromated Cu Kα radiation. X-ray photoelectron spectrum (XPS) measurements were determined by a photoelectron spectrometer using Al Kα radiation as the excitation source (PHI 5000 VersaProbe). All the peaks were calibrated with the C 1 s spectrum at a binding energy of 284.8 eV. In situ Raman spectrum measurements were performed on a Renishaw inVia reflex under excitation with 532 nm laser light. The NMR spectra were recorded on Varian Mercury Plus 400 instruments at 400 MHz (1H NMR) and 101 MHz (13C NMR). Chemical shifts were reported in parts per million (ppm) downfield from internal tetramethylsilane. Multiplicity was indicated as follows: s (singlet), d (doublet), t (triplet). Coupling constants were reported in hertz (Hz). Gas chromatography‒mass spectrometry (GC‒MS) was carried out with a TRACE DSQ. The ultraviolet‒visible (UV‒Vis) absorbance spectra were measured on a Beijing Purkinje General T6 new century spectrophotometer.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Comprehensive Characterization of Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The morphology of the samples was observed on scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (Apreo S LoVac, FEI, Hillsboro, Oregon, USA) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) (JEM-2100F, JEOL, Japan). The energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) was used to analyze the element distribution in samples. The zeta potential of samples was measured on a Malvern Zetasizer instrument (Nano ZS, Malvern Instruments, Malvern, UK). X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were recorded on a D8 advance X-ray powder diffractometer (Burker, Germany) with a 2θ angle in the range of 10–50° to investigate the crystal structure of all samples. Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectra were measured in the 4000–500 cm−1 on an FT-IR spectrometer (Nicolet AVATAR 360, Madison, Wisconsin, USA). The UV-vis-NIR spectra were recorded on a Lambda 35 spectrometer (Perkin Elmer, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA). Nitrogen adsorption/desorption isotherms were measured with ASAP 2420 (Micromeritics, Norcross, Georgia, USA). The specific surface area and pore size distribution of samples were calculated based on the Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) method and the Barret–Joyner–Hallenda model, respectively [39 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

PET Film Bioconversion at Varying Temperatures

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A mineral water bottle (crystallinity of 32.3%, NongFu Spring, Tianjin, China) was used as substrate. It was washed with 1% w/v SDS solution, ethanol, and deionized water, and was cut into films with a diameter of 6 mm. Each 2 mL centrifuge tube received two PET films, 300 μL basic reaction buffer (pH 9.0), and 12.5 μL enzyme for 6 days. Reaction temperature of 30 °C and 40 °C was used. Meanwhile, 8 sets of reactions were supplemented at 40 °C for 14 days. The protocol of terminating and analyzing the reaction was the same as that described in Section 3.7. Following the reaction, the PET was washed using the method described above. Traces of enzyme erosion on the PET surface were observed by field-emission scanning electron microscopy Apreo S LoVac (FEI, Hillsboro, OR, USA). All measurements were conducted in triplicate (n = 3).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Multi-Technique Material Characterization Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were recorded on X-ray diffractometer (D8 Advanced, Bruker, Germany) equipped with Cu Kα radiation with a scanning rate of 5° min−1. The morphologies were observed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM, Apreo S LoVac, FEI, America) and transmission electron microscope (TEM) with an acceleration voltage of 200 kV (Tecnai G2 F20, FEI, America). The local structure and oxygen vacancy were discerned through Aberration-corrected scanning transmission electron microscopy (JEM-ARM200F, JEOL, Japan). The electron spin resonance (EPR) spectra were obtained on JES-FA 200 spectrometer (JEOL, Japan). Surface elements were analyzed by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, Escalab 250, Thermo SCIENTIFIC, America). All energies were referenced to C 1 s peaks (284.8 eV) of the surface adventitious carbon. X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS) measurements for the Bi L3-edge were performed in fluorescence mode on beamline 20-BM-B with electron energy of 7 GeV and an average current of 100 mA. The radiation was monochromatized by a Si (111) double-crystal monochromator. X-ray absorption near edge structure (XANES) and extended X-ray absorption fine structure (EXAFS) data reduction and analysis were processed by Athena software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Analyzing Particles with SEM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SEM micrographs were recorded with two scanning electron microscopes, i.e. an Apreo S LoVac (Thermo Fisher Scientific) instrument with a segmented STEM (transmission mode) detector, and a FEI Quanta 400F instrument with a secondary electron (SE) detector. Particle were drop-cast onto carbon-coated copper grids and dried in air. Electrically insulating materials were sputter-coated with AuPd (80 : 20) before SEM analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Comprehensive Characterization of Solid Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To certify the structure of the obtained samples, X-ray powder diffraction (XRD, Miniflex 600, Rigaku, Tokyo, Japan) patterns were measured with the Cu-Kα radiation at a scan rate of 5°/min. The calcined temperature range, essential for this study, was determined using thermogravimetric analysis (TAG, TGA/DSC) in an Ar atmosphere, spanning from 30 to 1000 °C. Fourier-transformed infrared spectra (FT-IR, Nicolet iS 50, Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) were then employed for a more comprehensive analysis of the chemical bonds. N2 adsorption isotherms (Autosorb-iQ, Anton Paar, Boynton Beach, FL, USA) were utilized to determine the Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) surface area. The sample morphology was further analyzed using a field-emission scanning electron microscope (FESEM, Apreo S LoVac, Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) at a 5.0 kV acceleration voltage, equipped with an Energy Dispersive Spectrometer (EDS), and a transmission electron microscope (TEM, FEI Talos F200s, FEI, Hillsboro, OR, USA). Finally, to gain insights into the chemical compositions, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, Axis Supra, Shimadzu, Tokyo, Japan) was conducted.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Membrane Surface Characterization by SEM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) measurements of the surfaces of membrane selective layer were performed with the instrument Apreo S LoVac (Thermo Scientific™, Waltham, MA, USA). Samples were prepared in two different manners, either via freeze-drying of the water-wet membrane using the FreezeDryer Alpha 1–4 (Christ, Osterode am Harz, Germany) or via stepwise solvent exchange from water via water/ethanol mixtures to ethanol and finally to hexane and ultimately air drying. The sputtering with an alloy containing 80% Au and 20% Pd was done using a K-550 sputter coater (Emitech, Quorum Technologies Ltd, Laughton, UK).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Hep3B Cell Fixation and SEM Imaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Hep3B cells were cultured on coverslips with collagen (Type I solution from rat tail, Sigma C3867) and fixed in fixation buffer B (2.5% glutaraldehyde, 0.18 M Na2HPO4, 0.019 M KH2PO4, pH 7.2) after stimulation. The samples were submitted to Yimingfuxing Bio (Beijing, China) for embedding, according to standard procedures. A field emission scanning electron microscope (Apreo S LoVac, Thermo Fisher) at the Central Laboratory of Nankai University was used for observations.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Imaging Dispersed Particles on PEI-Coated Silicon

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For SEM image acquisition, the particles were first dispersed in water. In parallel, a single crystalline silicon wafer was immersed in a 10 g/L solution of PEI (270 kDa, branched) in water and cleaned with water after 10 min. Subsequently, the wafer was dried with compressed air and then immersed in the particle dispersion for another 10 min, followed by rinsing with water. Due to the electrostatic interactions between the PEI on the wafer surface and the particles, single particles could be imaged. To ensure sufficient conductivity of the sample, the samples were sputtered with an Au/Pd layer. The image acquisition was performed with the instrument Apreo S LoVac from Thermo Fisher Scientific (Waltham, MA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Advanced Material Characterization Techniques

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The morphology of the samples was observed by a scanning electron microscope with an operating voltage of 10 kV (SEM, Apreo S LoV ac, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA).
The X-ray diffraction data were taken using an X-ray diffractometer with CuK radiation and a measurement range of 20–80°, (XRD, Miniflex 600, Akishima, Rigaku, Tokyo, Japan).
The transmission electron microscopy and selected area electron diffraction images were obtained from an FEI Talos F200s transmission electron microscope, operated at 200 kV (TEM, SAED, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA).
High-resolution transmission electron microscopy was carried out on an FEI Titan Themis Z G3 30–300 spherical aberration-corrected transmission electron microscope, operated at 300 kV, equipped with both image and probe aberration (HRTEM, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA).
X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy was used to characterize the atomic composition and state at the surface of the samples, using Al Ka rays as the excitation source (XPS, Thermo Scientific K-Alpha, Waltham, MA, USA).
The UV-Vis absorbance spectra were collected by a Cary 5000 spectrophotometer, (UV-Vis, Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA).
The photoluminescence spectra were acquired using a fluorescence spectroscopy test system (PL, FLS980, Edinburgh Instruments Ltd., Livingston, UK).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!